【临床怀疑深静脉血栓患者的超声替代诊断】。

Medizinische Klinik Pub Date : 2010-09-01 Epub Date: 2010-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s00063-010-1101-z
Bettina-Maria Taute, Hannes Melnyk, Hubert Podhaisky
{"title":"【临床怀疑深静脉血栓患者的超声替代诊断】。","authors":"Bettina-Maria Taute,&nbsp;Hannes Melnyk,&nbsp;Hubert Podhaisky","doi":"10.1007/s00063-010-1101-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Unclear extremity complaints are common symptoms of inpatients. In a subset of these patients, a clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) results; this needs to be quickly and definitively clarified by a vascular physician. The question arose of how often a clinical suspicion of DVT was confirmed in an inpatient population and which alternative diagnoses were able to be made by angiologists.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In a retrospective analysis, all inpatients in the Angiologic Vascular Diagnostics Center of the University Hospital Halle, Germany, examined in 2007 for a suspicion of DVT were evaluated with respect to the definitively made diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 213 (28.6%) of 745 suspected cases of DVT, a DVT was confirmed. In 532 patients (71.4%), DVT was excluded. In 314 of these patients, 436 alternative diagnoses were recorded in the diagnostic reports of angiologic examinations. In 38.6% (n = 168), other venous causes could be confirmed as the most common alternative diagnosis. There were chronic venous diseases in 28% (n = 122), superficial thrombophlebitis (n = 27), and tumor-related pelvic vein compression (n = 19). 17.4% (n = 76) exhibited lymphedema. In 13.3% (n = 58), a generalized edema was diagnosed. Arthrogenic causes followed with 12.8% (n = 56). Lipedema (5.3%) and hematoma (5%) could be verified as other important differential diagnoses. Rare causes were symptomatic or ruptured Baker's cysts (2.5%), erysipelas (2.5%), abscess, aneurysm, muscle tears, and tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The variety of alternative diagnoses in patients with clinical suspicion of DVT is high. The knowledge and systematic examination of potential, even rare differential diagnoses after exclusion of DVT are part of the repertoire of the vascular physician. Unnecessary and expensive, as well as onerous, diagnostic procedures on the patient can be avoided. Anticoagulation that was begun as a result of the suspicion of DVT can quickly be stopped.</p>","PeriodicalId":18420,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00063-010-1101-z","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Alternative sonographic diagnoses in patients with clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis].\",\"authors\":\"Bettina-Maria Taute,&nbsp;Hannes Melnyk,&nbsp;Hubert Podhaisky\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00063-010-1101-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Unclear extremity complaints are common symptoms of inpatients. In a subset of these patients, a clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) results; this needs to be quickly and definitively clarified by a vascular physician. The question arose of how often a clinical suspicion of DVT was confirmed in an inpatient population and which alternative diagnoses were able to be made by angiologists.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In a retrospective analysis, all inpatients in the Angiologic Vascular Diagnostics Center of the University Hospital Halle, Germany, examined in 2007 for a suspicion of DVT were evaluated with respect to the definitively made diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 213 (28.6%) of 745 suspected cases of DVT, a DVT was confirmed. In 532 patients (71.4%), DVT was excluded. In 314 of these patients, 436 alternative diagnoses were recorded in the diagnostic reports of angiologic examinations. In 38.6% (n = 168), other venous causes could be confirmed as the most common alternative diagnosis. There were chronic venous diseases in 28% (n = 122), superficial thrombophlebitis (n = 27), and tumor-related pelvic vein compression (n = 19). 17.4% (n = 76) exhibited lymphedema. In 13.3% (n = 58), a generalized edema was diagnosed. Arthrogenic causes followed with 12.8% (n = 56). Lipedema (5.3%) and hematoma (5%) could be verified as other important differential diagnoses. Rare causes were symptomatic or ruptured Baker's cysts (2.5%), erysipelas (2.5%), abscess, aneurysm, muscle tears, and tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The variety of alternative diagnoses in patients with clinical suspicion of DVT is high. The knowledge and systematic examination of potential, even rare differential diagnoses after exclusion of DVT are part of the repertoire of the vascular physician. Unnecessary and expensive, as well as onerous, diagnostic procedures on the patient can be avoided. Anticoagulation that was begun as a result of the suspicion of DVT can quickly be stopped.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinische Klinik\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00063-010-1101-z\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinische Klinik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-010-1101-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2010/9/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-010-1101-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景与目的:不明确的肢体主诉是住院患者的常见症状。在这些患者的一部分,临床怀疑深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的结果;这需要血管内科医生迅速明确地加以澄清。由此产生的问题是,在住院患者中,临床怀疑深静脉血栓形成的频率有多高,以及血管学家能够做出哪些替代诊断。患者和方法:回顾性分析了2007年在德国哈雷大学医院血管诊断中心检查的所有疑似深静脉血栓的住院患者,并对确诊患者进行了评估。结果:745例疑似DVT中有213例(28.6%)确诊DVT。532例(71.4%)患者排除DVT。其中314例患者,在血管检查的诊断报告中记录了436种替代诊断。在38.6% (n = 168)的病例中,其他静脉病因是最常见的替代诊断。慢性静脉疾病占28%(122例),浅表血栓性静脉炎(27例),肿瘤相关盆腔静脉压迫(19例)。17.4% (n = 76)表现为淋巴水肿。13.3% (n = 58)被诊断为全身性水肿。其次是关节源性原因,占12.8% (n = 56)。脂水肿(5.3%)和血肿(5%)可作为其他重要的鉴别诊断。罕见的病因是有症状的或破裂的贝克氏囊肿(2.5%)、丹毒(2.5%)、脓肿、动脉瘤、肌肉撕裂和肿瘤。结论:临床怀疑深静脉血栓的患者可选择的诊断多种多样。知识和系统检查的潜在,甚至罕见的鉴别诊断后,排除深静脉血栓是血管医生的曲目的一部分。可以避免对患者进行不必要的、昂贵的以及繁重的诊断程序。由于怀疑深静脉血栓而开始的抗凝治疗可以很快停止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Alternative sonographic diagnoses in patients with clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis].

Background and purpose: Unclear extremity complaints are common symptoms of inpatients. In a subset of these patients, a clinical suspicion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) results; this needs to be quickly and definitively clarified by a vascular physician. The question arose of how often a clinical suspicion of DVT was confirmed in an inpatient population and which alternative diagnoses were able to be made by angiologists.

Patients and methods: In a retrospective analysis, all inpatients in the Angiologic Vascular Diagnostics Center of the University Hospital Halle, Germany, examined in 2007 for a suspicion of DVT were evaluated with respect to the definitively made diagnosis.

Results: In 213 (28.6%) of 745 suspected cases of DVT, a DVT was confirmed. In 532 patients (71.4%), DVT was excluded. In 314 of these patients, 436 alternative diagnoses were recorded in the diagnostic reports of angiologic examinations. In 38.6% (n = 168), other venous causes could be confirmed as the most common alternative diagnosis. There were chronic venous diseases in 28% (n = 122), superficial thrombophlebitis (n = 27), and tumor-related pelvic vein compression (n = 19). 17.4% (n = 76) exhibited lymphedema. In 13.3% (n = 58), a generalized edema was diagnosed. Arthrogenic causes followed with 12.8% (n = 56). Lipedema (5.3%) and hematoma (5%) could be verified as other important differential diagnoses. Rare causes were symptomatic or ruptured Baker's cysts (2.5%), erysipelas (2.5%), abscess, aneurysm, muscle tears, and tumors.

Conclusion: The variety of alternative diagnoses in patients with clinical suspicion of DVT is high. The knowledge and systematic examination of potential, even rare differential diagnoses after exclusion of DVT are part of the repertoire of the vascular physician. Unnecessary and expensive, as well as onerous, diagnostic procedures on the patient can be avoided. Anticoagulation that was begun as a result of the suspicion of DVT can quickly be stopped.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medizinische Klinik
Medizinische Klinik 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信