澳大利亚和中国妇女乳腺癌肿瘤生物学因素的初步比较。

Weiqiang Zheng, Jane E Armes, John Slavin, Yuzhao Zhu, Canrong Ni
{"title":"澳大利亚和中国妇女乳腺癌肿瘤生物学因素的初步比较。","authors":"Weiqiang Zheng,&nbsp;Jane E Armes,&nbsp;John Slavin,&nbsp;Yuzhao Zhu,&nbsp;Canrong Ni","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the morphologic and immunohistochemical properties of breast carcinomas from Chinese and Australian women in order to define possible biologic differences between these carcinomas.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Three hundred cases of breast carcinomas were assessed for histologic and immunophenotypic characteristics from the pathology archives of the Changhai and St. Vincent's Hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Chinese women had proportionally more grade 2 and 3 tumors, whereas Australian women had a higher proportion of grade 1 tumor. There was a higher proportion of younger patients with a larger tumor and patients with lymph node involvement in the Chinese group as compared with Australian women. There was no difference in rate of estrogen receptor positive tumors between the 2 groups. p53 Expression was statistically more common with less cyclin D1 expression in Chinese as compared with Australian women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that both inherent tumor biology and stage at presentation influence adversely affect the outcome of breast carcinoma in Chinese compared as with Australian women.</p>","PeriodicalId":76995,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","volume":"32 3","pages":"155-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary comparison of tumor biologic factors in breast carcinomas from Australian and Chinese women.\",\"authors\":\"Weiqiang Zheng,&nbsp;Jane E Armes,&nbsp;John Slavin,&nbsp;Yuzhao Zhu,&nbsp;Canrong Ni\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the morphologic and immunohistochemical properties of breast carcinomas from Chinese and Australian women in order to define possible biologic differences between these carcinomas.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Three hundred cases of breast carcinomas were assessed for histologic and immunophenotypic characteristics from the pathology archives of the Changhai and St. Vincent's Hospitals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Chinese women had proportionally more grade 2 and 3 tumors, whereas Australian women had a higher proportion of grade 1 tumor. There was a higher proportion of younger patients with a larger tumor and patients with lymph node involvement in the Chinese group as compared with Australian women. There was no difference in rate of estrogen receptor positive tumors between the 2 groups. p53 Expression was statistically more common with less cyclin D1 expression in Chinese as compared with Australian women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicates that both inherent tumor biology and stage at presentation influence adversely affect the outcome of breast carcinoma in Chinese compared as with Australian women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76995,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"155-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较中国和澳大利亚女性乳腺癌的形态学和免疫组织化学特征,以确定两种乳腺癌之间可能的生物学差异。研究设计:从长海医院和圣文森特医院的病理档案中对300例乳腺癌患者的组织学和免疫表型特征进行评估。结果:中国女性患2级和3级肿瘤的比例更高,而澳大利亚女性患1级肿瘤的比例更高。与澳大利亚女性相比,中国女性中肿瘤较大的年轻患者和淋巴结受累患者的比例更高。两组患者雌激素受体阳性肿瘤发生率无明显差异。与澳大利亚女性相比,中国女性p53表达更普遍,cyclin D1表达更少。结论:本研究表明,与澳大利亚妇女相比,中国妇女乳腺癌的预后受到肿瘤固有生物学和发病分期的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preliminary comparison of tumor biologic factors in breast carcinomas from Australian and Chinese women.

Objective: To compare the morphologic and immunohistochemical properties of breast carcinomas from Chinese and Australian women in order to define possible biologic differences between these carcinomas.

Study design: Three hundred cases of breast carcinomas were assessed for histologic and immunophenotypic characteristics from the pathology archives of the Changhai and St. Vincent's Hospitals.

Results: The Chinese women had proportionally more grade 2 and 3 tumors, whereas Australian women had a higher proportion of grade 1 tumor. There was a higher proportion of younger patients with a larger tumor and patients with lymph node involvement in the Chinese group as compared with Australian women. There was no difference in rate of estrogen receptor positive tumors between the 2 groups. p53 Expression was statistically more common with less cyclin D1 expression in Chinese as compared with Australian women.

Conclusion: This study indicates that both inherent tumor biology and stage at presentation influence adversely affect the outcome of breast carcinoma in Chinese compared as with Australian women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信