年龄对信念偏误三段论推理中额叶下皮层半球不对称活动的影响:近红外光谱研究

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Takeo Tsujii , Mitsuhiro Okada , Shigeru Watanabe
{"title":"年龄对信念偏误三段论推理中额叶下皮层半球不对称活动的影响:近红外光谱研究","authors":"Takeo Tsujii ,&nbsp;Mitsuhiro Okada ,&nbsp;Shigeru Watanabe","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2010.02.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The belief–bias effect in syllogistic reasoning refers to the tendency for subjects to be erroneously biased when logical conclusions are incongruent with beliefs about the world. This study examined age-related differences in inferior frontal cortex (IFC) activity associated with belief–bias reasoning using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). The subjects were 32 older (mean age, 68.53 years) and 32 young adult volunteers (mean age, 21.50 years). They performed belief-congruent and incongruent reasoning trials while right and left IFC activities were being measured by NIRS. Behavioral analysis found that older adults exhibited a larger belief–bias than young adults. NIRS analysis showed that the right IFC was more activated than the left IFC in young adults, while there was no significant hemispheric difference in older adults. On correlation analysis, there was a significant positive correlation between reasoning accuracy and IFC activation in both hemispheres for older adults, while in young adults, the correlation was significant only in the right hemisphere. These correlation patterns suggest that the right IFC is critical for resolving conflicting reasoning in young adults, but that older adults may further recruit the left IFC to compensate for the age-related decline in the inhibitory control functions. Thus, we demonstrate, for the first time, age-related differences in neural activity associated with belief–bias reasoning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"210 2","pages":"Pages 178-183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.02.027","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of aging on hemispheric asymmetry in inferior frontal cortex activity during belief–bias syllogistic reasoning: A near-infrared spectroscopy study\",\"authors\":\"Takeo Tsujii ,&nbsp;Mitsuhiro Okada ,&nbsp;Shigeru Watanabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bbr.2010.02.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The belief–bias effect in syllogistic reasoning refers to the tendency for subjects to be erroneously biased when logical conclusions are incongruent with beliefs about the world. This study examined age-related differences in inferior frontal cortex (IFC) activity associated with belief–bias reasoning using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). The subjects were 32 older (mean age, 68.53 years) and 32 young adult volunteers (mean age, 21.50 years). They performed belief-congruent and incongruent reasoning trials while right and left IFC activities were being measured by NIRS. Behavioral analysis found that older adults exhibited a larger belief–bias than young adults. NIRS analysis showed that the right IFC was more activated than the left IFC in young adults, while there was no significant hemispheric difference in older adults. On correlation analysis, there was a significant positive correlation between reasoning accuracy and IFC activation in both hemispheres for older adults, while in young adults, the correlation was significant only in the right hemisphere. These correlation patterns suggest that the right IFC is critical for resolving conflicting reasoning in young adults, but that older adults may further recruit the left IFC to compensate for the age-related decline in the inhibitory control functions. Thus, we demonstrate, for the first time, age-related differences in neural activity associated with belief–bias reasoning.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"volume\":\"210 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 178-183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.02.027\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioural Brain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432810001270\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432810001270","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

三段论推理中的信念偏差效应是指当逻辑结论与对世界的信念不一致时,受试者倾向于产生错误的偏见。本研究使用近红外光谱(NIRS)检测了与信念偏差推理相关的下额叶皮层(IFC)活动的年龄相关差异。受试者为32名老年人(平均年龄68.53岁)和32名青年志愿者(平均年龄21.50岁)。他们进行信念一致和不一致的推理试验,同时用近红外光谱测量右侧和左侧IFC活动。行为分析发现,老年人比年轻人表现出更大的信仰偏见。近红外光谱分析显示,在年轻人中,右侧IFC比左侧IFC更活跃,而在老年人中没有明显的半球差异。在相关分析中,老年人的推理准确性与两个半球的IFC激活之间存在显著的正相关,而在年轻人中,相关性仅在右半球显著。这些相关模式表明,在年轻人中,右侧IFC对于解决矛盾推理至关重要,但老年人可能会进一步调动左侧IFC来弥补与年龄相关的抑制控制功能下降。因此,我们首次证明了与信仰偏见推理相关的神经活动的年龄相关差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of aging on hemispheric asymmetry in inferior frontal cortex activity during belief–bias syllogistic reasoning: A near-infrared spectroscopy study

The belief–bias effect in syllogistic reasoning refers to the tendency for subjects to be erroneously biased when logical conclusions are incongruent with beliefs about the world. This study examined age-related differences in inferior frontal cortex (IFC) activity associated with belief–bias reasoning using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). The subjects were 32 older (mean age, 68.53 years) and 32 young adult volunteers (mean age, 21.50 years). They performed belief-congruent and incongruent reasoning trials while right and left IFC activities were being measured by NIRS. Behavioral analysis found that older adults exhibited a larger belief–bias than young adults. NIRS analysis showed that the right IFC was more activated than the left IFC in young adults, while there was no significant hemispheric difference in older adults. On correlation analysis, there was a significant positive correlation between reasoning accuracy and IFC activation in both hemispheres for older adults, while in young adults, the correlation was significant only in the right hemisphere. These correlation patterns suggest that the right IFC is critical for resolving conflicting reasoning in young adults, but that older adults may further recruit the left IFC to compensate for the age-related decline in the inhibitory control functions. Thus, we demonstrate, for the first time, age-related differences in neural activity associated with belief–bias reasoning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信