系统性红斑狼疮发作和持续活动性疾病的频率和决定因素。

Mandana Nikpour, Murray B Urowitz, Dominique Ibañez, Dafna D Gladman
{"title":"系统性红斑狼疮发作和持续活动性疾病的频率和决定因素。","authors":"Mandana Nikpour,&nbsp;Murray B Urowitz,&nbsp;Dominique Ibañez,&nbsp;Dafna D Gladman","doi":"10.1002/art.24741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Selection of flare as the primary outcome variable in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical trials fails to capture patients with persistently active disease (PAD). We sought to elucidate the frequency and determinants of flare and PAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected data from the Toronto Lupus Cohort were used to determine the incidence of flare and PAD in 2004 and 2005. Flare was defined as an increase in SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 update (SLEDAI-2K) score of >/=4 from the previous visit. PAD was defined as a SLEDAI-2K score of >/=4, excluding serology alone, on >/=2 consecutive visits. Data from 1, 2, and 3 years prior were used to model flare and PAD in 2004. Model properties were tested for prediction of flare and PAD in 2005.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-third of the patients had >/=1 flare, whereas nearly half experienced PAD in a given year. Nearly 60% of the patients had episodes of flare or PAD per year. At least 25% of patients had PAD without achieving the definition of flare. In the best-fitting model, predictors of PAD in 2004 were SLEDAI-2K score at the start of the outcome interval and prior cutaneous or musculoskeletal disease activity. This model gave 79% correct prediction of PAD in 2005. In contrast, flare prediction models performed poorly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Persistent activity is a common disease state in SLE and should be an outcome variable in SLE clinical trials. Our PAD prediction model may aid prognostication and selection of patients for inclusion in clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":8405,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis and rheumatism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/art.24741","citationCount":"121","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency and determinants of flare and persistently active disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.\",\"authors\":\"Mandana Nikpour,&nbsp;Murray B Urowitz,&nbsp;Dominique Ibañez,&nbsp;Dafna D Gladman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/art.24741\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Selection of flare as the primary outcome variable in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical trials fails to capture patients with persistently active disease (PAD). We sought to elucidate the frequency and determinants of flare and PAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospectively collected data from the Toronto Lupus Cohort were used to determine the incidence of flare and PAD in 2004 and 2005. Flare was defined as an increase in SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 update (SLEDAI-2K) score of >/=4 from the previous visit. PAD was defined as a SLEDAI-2K score of >/=4, excluding serology alone, on >/=2 consecutive visits. Data from 1, 2, and 3 years prior were used to model flare and PAD in 2004. Model properties were tested for prediction of flare and PAD in 2005.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One-third of the patients had >/=1 flare, whereas nearly half experienced PAD in a given year. Nearly 60% of the patients had episodes of flare or PAD per year. At least 25% of patients had PAD without achieving the definition of flare. In the best-fitting model, predictors of PAD in 2004 were SLEDAI-2K score at the start of the outcome interval and prior cutaneous or musculoskeletal disease activity. This model gave 79% correct prediction of PAD in 2005. In contrast, flare prediction models performed poorly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Persistent activity is a common disease state in SLE and should be an outcome variable in SLE clinical trials. Our PAD prediction model may aid prognostication and selection of patients for inclusion in clinical trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis and rheumatism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/art.24741\",\"citationCount\":\"121\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis and rheumatism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24741\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 121

摘要

目的:选择耀斑作为系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)临床试验的主要结局变量未能捕获持续性活动性疾病(PAD)患者。我们试图阐明耀斑和PAD的频率和决定因素。方法:采用2004年和2005年多伦多狼疮队列前瞻性收集的数据来确定耀斑和PAD的发生率。耀斑被定义为SLE疾病活动指数2000更新(SLEDAI-2K)评分比上次访问增加>/=4。PAD的定义是SLEDAI-2K评分>/=4,不包括血清学,连续访问>/=2次。2004年,利用1、2和3年前的数据来模拟耀斑和PAD。2005年对模型性能进行了测试,用于预测耀斑和PAD。结果:三分之一的患者有>/=1次耀斑,而近一半的患者在给定的一年中经历过PAD。每年有近60%的患者有急性发作或PAD发作。至少25%的患者有PAD,但没有达到耀斑的定义。在最佳拟合模型中,2004年PAD的预测因子是结果间隔开始时的SLEDAI-2K评分和既往皮肤或肌肉骨骼疾病活动。该模型对2005年PAD的预测准确率为79%。相比之下,耀斑预测模型表现不佳。结论:持续活动是SLE的常见疾病状态,应作为SLE临床试验的结果变量。我们的PAD预测模型可能有助于临床试验患者的预测和选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequency and determinants of flare and persistently active disease in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Objective: Selection of flare as the primary outcome variable in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) clinical trials fails to capture patients with persistently active disease (PAD). We sought to elucidate the frequency and determinants of flare and PAD.

Methods: Prospectively collected data from the Toronto Lupus Cohort were used to determine the incidence of flare and PAD in 2004 and 2005. Flare was defined as an increase in SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 update (SLEDAI-2K) score of >/=4 from the previous visit. PAD was defined as a SLEDAI-2K score of >/=4, excluding serology alone, on >/=2 consecutive visits. Data from 1, 2, and 3 years prior were used to model flare and PAD in 2004. Model properties were tested for prediction of flare and PAD in 2005.

Results: One-third of the patients had >/=1 flare, whereas nearly half experienced PAD in a given year. Nearly 60% of the patients had episodes of flare or PAD per year. At least 25% of patients had PAD without achieving the definition of flare. In the best-fitting model, predictors of PAD in 2004 were SLEDAI-2K score at the start of the outcome interval and prior cutaneous or musculoskeletal disease activity. This model gave 79% correct prediction of PAD in 2005. In contrast, flare prediction models performed poorly.

Conclusion: Persistent activity is a common disease state in SLE and should be an outcome variable in SLE clinical trials. Our PAD prediction model may aid prognostication and selection of patients for inclusion in clinical trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arthritis and rheumatism
Arthritis and rheumatism 医学-风湿病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信