准备好改变女大学生的饮酒行为。

Q1 Medicine
Debra L Kaysen, Christine M Lee, Joseph W Labrie, Sean J Tollison
{"title":"准备好改变女大学生的饮酒行为。","authors":"Debra L Kaysen,&nbsp;Christine M Lee,&nbsp;Joseph W Labrie,&nbsp;Sean J Tollison","doi":"10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Motivational interviewing (MI) therapies are effective in reducing high-risk drinking in college populations. Although research supports efficacy of MI prevention strategies in reducing alcohol use, there are little data examining readiness to change (RTC), the underlying theoretical model of MI interventions. The purpose of the present study was to explore RTC variability and drinking behavior and whether MI increases RTC in an intervention group compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two-hundred eighty-five first-year female college students participated in the study. Present analyses focused on those students who consumed alcohol in the month before the study (n = 182). RTC was measured using the Readiness to Change Ruler.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses were conducted using hierarchical linear modeling. There was significant variability in RTC: 71.86% of variance in RTC was between-person differences, and 28.14% was within-person differences. Higher RTC was associated with lower intentions to drink and future drinking behavior. However, in weeks in which students drank more, they experienced a decrease in RTC. Based on the significant cross-level interaction, the intervention group had significantly higher RTC than controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results provided partial support for our hypotheses. The overall theoretical construct of RTC varies both across and within individuals. These results also offer support for the utility of MI-based prevention strategies in increasing RTC within individuals. However, we did not consistently find that these changes related to drinking changes. Findings provide support for both the construct of RTC and utility of MI interventions in changing these beliefs in female college students.</p>","PeriodicalId":17103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement","volume":" 16","pages":"106-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.106","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Readiness to change drinking behavior in female college students.\",\"authors\":\"Debra L Kaysen,&nbsp;Christine M Lee,&nbsp;Joseph W Labrie,&nbsp;Sean J Tollison\",\"doi\":\"10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Motivational interviewing (MI) therapies are effective in reducing high-risk drinking in college populations. Although research supports efficacy of MI prevention strategies in reducing alcohol use, there are little data examining readiness to change (RTC), the underlying theoretical model of MI interventions. The purpose of the present study was to explore RTC variability and drinking behavior and whether MI increases RTC in an intervention group compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Two-hundred eighty-five first-year female college students participated in the study. Present analyses focused on those students who consumed alcohol in the month before the study (n = 182). RTC was measured using the Readiness to Change Ruler.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses were conducted using hierarchical linear modeling. There was significant variability in RTC: 71.86% of variance in RTC was between-person differences, and 28.14% was within-person differences. Higher RTC was associated with lower intentions to drink and future drinking behavior. However, in weeks in which students drank more, they experienced a decrease in RTC. Based on the significant cross-level interaction, the intervention group had significantly higher RTC than controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results provided partial support for our hypotheses. The overall theoretical construct of RTC varies both across and within individuals. These results also offer support for the utility of MI-based prevention strategies in increasing RTC within individuals. However, we did not consistently find that these changes related to drinking changes. Findings provide support for both the construct of RTC and utility of MI interventions in changing these beliefs in female college students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement\",\"volume\":\" 16\",\"pages\":\"106-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.106\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsads.2009.s16.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

目的:动机访谈(MI)疗法在减少大学人群饮酒高危人群中是有效的。尽管研究支持心肌梗死预防策略在减少酒精使用方面的有效性,但很少有数据检验改变意愿(RTC),即心肌梗死干预的潜在理论模型。本研究的目的是探讨干预组的RTC变异性和饮酒行为,以及与对照组相比,心肌梗死是否会增加RTC。方法:以285名女大学生为研究对象。目前的分析集中在研究前一个月饮酒的学生(n = 182)。RTC是用准备改变标尺测量的。结果:采用层次线性模型进行分析。RTC差异显著:71.86%的RTC差异为人间差异,28.14%为人内差异。较高的RTC与较低的饮酒意图和未来的饮酒行为有关。然而,在学生喝得更多的几周内,他们的RTC减少了。基于显著的跨水平交互作用,干预组的RTC显著高于对照组。结论:这些结果为我们的假设提供了部分支持。RTC的整体理论结构在个体之间和个体内部都是不同的。这些结果也为基于mi的预防策略在增加个体RTC方面的效用提供了支持。然而,我们并没有一致地发现这些变化与饮酒变化有关。研究结果支持RTC的构建和MI干预在改变女大学生这些信念方面的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Readiness to change drinking behavior in female college students.

Objective: Motivational interviewing (MI) therapies are effective in reducing high-risk drinking in college populations. Although research supports efficacy of MI prevention strategies in reducing alcohol use, there are little data examining readiness to change (RTC), the underlying theoretical model of MI interventions. The purpose of the present study was to explore RTC variability and drinking behavior and whether MI increases RTC in an intervention group compared with controls.

Method: Two-hundred eighty-five first-year female college students participated in the study. Present analyses focused on those students who consumed alcohol in the month before the study (n = 182). RTC was measured using the Readiness to Change Ruler.

Results: Analyses were conducted using hierarchical linear modeling. There was significant variability in RTC: 71.86% of variance in RTC was between-person differences, and 28.14% was within-person differences. Higher RTC was associated with lower intentions to drink and future drinking behavior. However, in weeks in which students drank more, they experienced a decrease in RTC. Based on the significant cross-level interaction, the intervention group had significantly higher RTC than controls.

Conclusions: These results provided partial support for our hypotheses. The overall theoretical construct of RTC varies both across and within individuals. These results also offer support for the utility of MI-based prevention strategies in increasing RTC within individuals. However, we did not consistently find that these changes related to drinking changes. Findings provide support for both the construct of RTC and utility of MI interventions in changing these beliefs in female college students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信