本能概念的意识形态意义与运用。

Graham Richards
{"title":"本能概念的意识形态意义与运用。","authors":"Graham Richards","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the latter half of the 20th century it tended to be taken for granted within Psychology that \"nativist\" or \"hereditarian\" theoretical positions were intrinsically right-wing in their ideological connotations, while those of \"environmentalist\" positions were left-wing. In this paper, written from the perspective of a critical historian of Psychology, it is suggested that this is too simplistic. As popularly understood, the term \"instinct\" has at least three meanings, which differ considerably in their ethical register. It is argued that in none of these senses can unambiguous ideological implications can be drawn.</p>","PeriodicalId":82271,"journal":{"name":"Passauer Schriften zur Psychologiegeschichte","volume":"13 ","pages":"193-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideological meanings and uses of the instinct concept.\",\"authors\":\"Graham Richards\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During the latter half of the 20th century it tended to be taken for granted within Psychology that \\\"nativist\\\" or \\\"hereditarian\\\" theoretical positions were intrinsically right-wing in their ideological connotations, while those of \\\"environmentalist\\\" positions were left-wing. In this paper, written from the perspective of a critical historian of Psychology, it is suggested that this is too simplistic. As popularly understood, the term \\\"instinct\\\" has at least three meanings, which differ considerably in their ethical register. It is argued that in none of these senses can unambiguous ideological implications can be drawn.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":82271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Passauer Schriften zur Psychologiegeschichte\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"193-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Passauer Schriften zur Psychologiegeschichte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Passauer Schriften zur Psychologiegeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在20世纪后半叶,心理学学界倾向于理所当然地认为,“本土主义”或“遗传主义”的理论立场在其意识形态内涵上本质上是右翼的,而“环境主义”的立场则是左翼的。在本文中,从心理学批判历史学家的角度出发,认为这种观点过于简单化。正如人们普遍理解的那样,“本能”一词至少有三种含义,它们在伦理意义上有很大的不同。有人认为,在这些意义上都不能得出明确的意识形态含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ideological meanings and uses of the instinct concept.

During the latter half of the 20th century it tended to be taken for granted within Psychology that "nativist" or "hereditarian" theoretical positions were intrinsically right-wing in their ideological connotations, while those of "environmentalist" positions were left-wing. In this paper, written from the perspective of a critical historian of Psychology, it is suggested that this is too simplistic. As popularly understood, the term "instinct" has at least three meanings, which differ considerably in their ethical register. It is argued that in none of these senses can unambiguous ideological implications can be drawn.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信