与新热带先锋树种子有关的真菌的多样性和进化起源:分析真菌环境样本的案例研究

Jana M. U'Ren , James W. Dalling , Rachel E. Gallery , David R. Maddison , E. Christine Davis , Cara M. Gibson , A. Elizabeth Arnold
{"title":"与新热带先锋树种子有关的真菌的多样性和进化起源:分析真菌环境样本的案例研究","authors":"Jana M. U'Ren ,&nbsp;James W. Dalling ,&nbsp;Rachel E. Gallery ,&nbsp;David R. Maddison ,&nbsp;E. Christine Davis ,&nbsp;Cara M. Gibson ,&nbsp;A. Elizabeth Arnold","doi":"10.1016/j.mycres.2008.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fungi associated with seeds of tropical trees pervasively affect seed survival and germination, and thus are an important, but understudied, component of forest ecology. Here, we examine the diversity and evolutionary origins of fungi isolated from seeds of an important pioneer tree (<em>Cecropia insignis, Cecropiaceae</em>) following burial in soil for five months in a tropical moist forest in Panama. Our approach, which relied on molecular sequence data because most isolates did not sporulate in culture, provides an opportunity to evaluate several methods currently used to analyse environmental samples of fungi. First, intra- and interspecific divergence were estimated for the nu-rITS and 5.8S gene for four genera of <em>Ascomycota</em> that are commonly recovered from seeds. Using these values we estimated species boundaries for 527 isolates, showing that seed-associated fungi are highly diverse, horizontally transmitted, and genotypically congruent with some foliar endophytes from the same site. We then examined methods for inferring the taxonomic placement and phylogenetic relationships of these fungi, evaluating the effects of manual <em>versus</em> automated alignment, model selection, and inference methods, as well as the quality of BLAST-based identification using GenBank. We found that common methods such as neighbor-joining and Bayesian inference differ in their sensitivity to alignment methods; analyses of particular fungal genera differ in their sensitivity to alignments; and numerous and sometimes intricate disparities exist between BLAST-based <em>versus</em> phylogeny-based identification methods. Lastly, we used our most robust methods to infer phylogenetic relationships of seed-associated fungi in four focal genera, and reconstructed ancestral states to generate preliminary hypotheses regarding the evolutionary origins of this guild. Our results illustrate the dynamic evolutionary relationships among endophytic fungi, pathogens, and seed-associated fungi, and the apparent evolutionary distinctiveness of saprotrophs. Our study also elucidates the diversity, taxonomy, and ecology of an important group of plant-associated fungi and highlights some of the advantages and challenges inherent in the use of ITS data for environmental sampling of fungi.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19045,"journal":{"name":"Mycological research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mycres.2008.11.015","citationCount":"136","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity and evolutionary origins of fungi associated with seeds of a neotropical pioneer tree: a case study for analysing fungal environmental samples\",\"authors\":\"Jana M. U'Ren ,&nbsp;James W. Dalling ,&nbsp;Rachel E. Gallery ,&nbsp;David R. Maddison ,&nbsp;E. Christine Davis ,&nbsp;Cara M. Gibson ,&nbsp;A. Elizabeth Arnold\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mycres.2008.11.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fungi associated with seeds of tropical trees pervasively affect seed survival and germination, and thus are an important, but understudied, component of forest ecology. Here, we examine the diversity and evolutionary origins of fungi isolated from seeds of an important pioneer tree (<em>Cecropia insignis, Cecropiaceae</em>) following burial in soil for five months in a tropical moist forest in Panama. Our approach, which relied on molecular sequence data because most isolates did not sporulate in culture, provides an opportunity to evaluate several methods currently used to analyse environmental samples of fungi. First, intra- and interspecific divergence were estimated for the nu-rITS and 5.8S gene for four genera of <em>Ascomycota</em> that are commonly recovered from seeds. Using these values we estimated species boundaries for 527 isolates, showing that seed-associated fungi are highly diverse, horizontally transmitted, and genotypically congruent with some foliar endophytes from the same site. We then examined methods for inferring the taxonomic placement and phylogenetic relationships of these fungi, evaluating the effects of manual <em>versus</em> automated alignment, model selection, and inference methods, as well as the quality of BLAST-based identification using GenBank. We found that common methods such as neighbor-joining and Bayesian inference differ in their sensitivity to alignment methods; analyses of particular fungal genera differ in their sensitivity to alignments; and numerous and sometimes intricate disparities exist between BLAST-based <em>versus</em> phylogeny-based identification methods. Lastly, we used our most robust methods to infer phylogenetic relationships of seed-associated fungi in four focal genera, and reconstructed ancestral states to generate preliminary hypotheses regarding the evolutionary origins of this guild. Our results illustrate the dynamic evolutionary relationships among endophytic fungi, pathogens, and seed-associated fungi, and the apparent evolutionary distinctiveness of saprotrophs. Our study also elucidates the diversity, taxonomy, and ecology of an important group of plant-associated fungi and highlights some of the advantages and challenges inherent in the use of ITS data for environmental sampling of fungi.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mycological research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mycres.2008.11.015\",\"citationCount\":\"136\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mycological research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953756208002694\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycological research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0953756208002694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 136

摘要

与热带树木种子相关的真菌普遍影响种子的存活和萌发,因此是森林生态的一个重要组成部分,但研究不足。在这里,我们研究了一种重要的先锋树(Cecropia insignis, Cecropiaceae)在巴拿马热带潮湿森林土壤中埋藏五个月后从种子中分离出的真菌的多样性和进化起源。我们的方法依赖于分子序列数据,因为大多数分离株在培养中不产孢子,这为评估目前用于分析真菌环境样本的几种方法提供了机会。首先,估计了通常从种子中恢复的4属子囊菌的nu-rITS和5.8S基因的种内和种间差异。利用这些值,我们估计了527个分离株的物种边界,表明种子相关真菌高度多样化,水平传播,并且与来自同一地点的一些叶面内生菌具有基因典型一致性。然后,我们研究了推断这些真菌的分类位置和系统发育关系的方法,评估了人工与自动比对、模型选择和推断方法的效果,以及使用GenBank进行基于blast的鉴定的质量。我们发现常见的方法如邻居连接和贝叶斯推理对对齐方法的敏感性存在差异;对特定真菌属的分析在它们对排列的敏感性上有所不同;基于blast的识别方法与基于系统发育的识别方法之间存在许多甚至复杂的差异。最后,我们使用最稳健的方法推断了四个焦点属的种子相关真菌的系统发育关系,并重建了祖先状态,以产生关于这一群体进化起源的初步假设。我们的研究结果说明了内生真菌、病原体和种子相关真菌之间的动态进化关系,以及腐养菌明显的进化独特性。我们的研究还阐明了一组重要的植物相关真菌的多样性、分类和生态学,并强调了使用ITS数据进行真菌环境采样的一些固有优势和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diversity and evolutionary origins of fungi associated with seeds of a neotropical pioneer tree: a case study for analysing fungal environmental samples

Fungi associated with seeds of tropical trees pervasively affect seed survival and germination, and thus are an important, but understudied, component of forest ecology. Here, we examine the diversity and evolutionary origins of fungi isolated from seeds of an important pioneer tree (Cecropia insignis, Cecropiaceae) following burial in soil for five months in a tropical moist forest in Panama. Our approach, which relied on molecular sequence data because most isolates did not sporulate in culture, provides an opportunity to evaluate several methods currently used to analyse environmental samples of fungi. First, intra- and interspecific divergence were estimated for the nu-rITS and 5.8S gene for four genera of Ascomycota that are commonly recovered from seeds. Using these values we estimated species boundaries for 527 isolates, showing that seed-associated fungi are highly diverse, horizontally transmitted, and genotypically congruent with some foliar endophytes from the same site. We then examined methods for inferring the taxonomic placement and phylogenetic relationships of these fungi, evaluating the effects of manual versus automated alignment, model selection, and inference methods, as well as the quality of BLAST-based identification using GenBank. We found that common methods such as neighbor-joining and Bayesian inference differ in their sensitivity to alignment methods; analyses of particular fungal genera differ in their sensitivity to alignments; and numerous and sometimes intricate disparities exist between BLAST-based versus phylogeny-based identification methods. Lastly, we used our most robust methods to infer phylogenetic relationships of seed-associated fungi in four focal genera, and reconstructed ancestral states to generate preliminary hypotheses regarding the evolutionary origins of this guild. Our results illustrate the dynamic evolutionary relationships among endophytic fungi, pathogens, and seed-associated fungi, and the apparent evolutionary distinctiveness of saprotrophs. Our study also elucidates the diversity, taxonomy, and ecology of an important group of plant-associated fungi and highlights some of the advantages and challenges inherent in the use of ITS data for environmental sampling of fungi.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信