[80岁以上肺炎入院]。

G Zubillaga Garmendia, E Sánchez Haya, J Benavente Claveras, E Ceciaga Elexpuru, I Zamarreño Gómez, E Zubillaga Azpíroz, C Sarasqueta Eizaguirre
{"title":"[80岁以上肺炎入院]。","authors":"G Zubillaga Garmendia,&nbsp;E Sánchez Haya,&nbsp;J Benavente Claveras,&nbsp;E Ceciaga Elexpuru,&nbsp;I Zamarreño Gómez,&nbsp;E Zubillaga Azpíroz,&nbsp;C Sarasqueta Eizaguirre","doi":"10.4321/s0212-71992008000300004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze and compare differences in patients older than 80 years with Community acquired Pneumonia admitted in Internal Medicine or Pneumology of a General Hospital from the Emergency Room.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective study of all the 277 patients above 80 years admitted into the Hospital in 2005 with the main diagnosis of Pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>84% community-acquired, 16% from Institutions. Mean age: 85.8 y (48% men, 52% women). 19% FINE-3, 49% FINE-4, 32% FINE-5. Known etiology: 25% (Pneumococcal 19%, H. Influenzae and other Gram (-) 6%. 75% treated by Internists, 22% treated by Pneumologists. Standard Guidelines followed up by 30,5% a variant 60% (Equal by Internists or Pneumologists). Time door-1st antibiotic dose 6.6 hours. Global Mortality 16.7%. Women died at 87.4 y, men at 84.5 y (p = 0.035). Mortality FINE 3-4-5: 4.5, 12.4, 30% respectively. Mortality treated before 4 hours: 34.6%, after 4 hours: 11.5% (p = 0.01). Many more FINE 5 cases in Int. Medicine than Pneumology. Mortality by Internists 22%. Mortality by Pneumologists 3% (p = 0.001). Mortality similar following strict guidelines or variant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>a) Internist receive patients sicker than Pneumologists; b) Important mortality in these very old patients of 16.7%, and progressive according the FINE severity index, in spite of correct therapy; c) Rapid initiation of Antibiotics did not decreased mortality; d) Mortality did not change following strict or variant Guidelines; and e) There are areas of quality improvement in our Hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":50798,"journal":{"name":"Anales De Medicina Interna","volume":"25 3","pages":"117-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Pneumonia above 80 years, admitted to the hospital].\",\"authors\":\"G Zubillaga Garmendia,&nbsp;E Sánchez Haya,&nbsp;J Benavente Claveras,&nbsp;E Ceciaga Elexpuru,&nbsp;I Zamarreño Gómez,&nbsp;E Zubillaga Azpíroz,&nbsp;C Sarasqueta Eizaguirre\",\"doi\":\"10.4321/s0212-71992008000300004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze and compare differences in patients older than 80 years with Community acquired Pneumonia admitted in Internal Medicine or Pneumology of a General Hospital from the Emergency Room.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Retrospective study of all the 277 patients above 80 years admitted into the Hospital in 2005 with the main diagnosis of Pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>84% community-acquired, 16% from Institutions. Mean age: 85.8 y (48% men, 52% women). 19% FINE-3, 49% FINE-4, 32% FINE-5. Known etiology: 25% (Pneumococcal 19%, H. Influenzae and other Gram (-) 6%. 75% treated by Internists, 22% treated by Pneumologists. Standard Guidelines followed up by 30,5% a variant 60% (Equal by Internists or Pneumologists). Time door-1st antibiotic dose 6.6 hours. Global Mortality 16.7%. Women died at 87.4 y, men at 84.5 y (p = 0.035). Mortality FINE 3-4-5: 4.5, 12.4, 30% respectively. Mortality treated before 4 hours: 34.6%, after 4 hours: 11.5% (p = 0.01). Many more FINE 5 cases in Int. Medicine than Pneumology. Mortality by Internists 22%. Mortality by Pneumologists 3% (p = 0.001). Mortality similar following strict guidelines or variant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>a) Internist receive patients sicker than Pneumologists; b) Important mortality in these very old patients of 16.7%, and progressive according the FINE severity index, in spite of correct therapy; c) Rapid initiation of Antibiotics did not decreased mortality; d) Mortality did not change following strict or variant Guidelines; and e) There are areas of quality improvement in our Hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales De Medicina Interna\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"117-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales De Medicina Interna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4321/s0212-71992008000300004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales De Medicina Interna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4321/s0212-71992008000300004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:分析比较某综合医院内科和内科急诊室收治的80岁以上社区获得性肺炎患者的差异。材料与方法:回顾性分析我院2005年收治的以肺炎为主要诊断的80岁以上患者277例。结果:84%来自社区,16%来自机构。平均年龄:85.8岁(男性48%,女性52%)。19%没问题,3 49%没问题,4 32%没问题,5。已知病因:25%(肺炎球菌19%,流感嗜血杆菌和其他革兰氏菌6%)。75%由内科医生治疗,22%由肺科医生治疗。标准指南的随访率为30.5%,变异率为60%(内科医生或肺病学家的随访率相等)。时间门-第一次抗生素给药6.6小时。全球死亡率16.7%。女性为87.4岁,男性为84.5岁(p = 0.035)。死亡率:3-4-5:4.5%,12.4%,30%。治疗前4 h死亡率为34.6%,治疗后4 h死亡率为11.5% (p = 0.01)。在Int有更多的FINE 5病例。医学比肺病。内科医生死亡率22%。肺炎专家死亡率3% (p = 0.001)。死亡率相似,遵循严格的指导方针或有所不同。结论:a)内科医生接待的病人病情较肺病科医生严重;b)这些高龄患者的重要死亡率为16.7%,根据FINE严重程度指数,尽管接受了正确的治疗,但仍有进展;c)迅速开始使用抗生素并没有降低死亡率;d)死亡率在严格的或不同的指导方针下没有改变;e)我们的医院在质量方面有所改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Pneumonia above 80 years, admitted to the hospital].

Objective: To analyze and compare differences in patients older than 80 years with Community acquired Pneumonia admitted in Internal Medicine or Pneumology of a General Hospital from the Emergency Room.

Material and methods: Retrospective study of all the 277 patients above 80 years admitted into the Hospital in 2005 with the main diagnosis of Pneumonia.

Results: 84% community-acquired, 16% from Institutions. Mean age: 85.8 y (48% men, 52% women). 19% FINE-3, 49% FINE-4, 32% FINE-5. Known etiology: 25% (Pneumococcal 19%, H. Influenzae and other Gram (-) 6%. 75% treated by Internists, 22% treated by Pneumologists. Standard Guidelines followed up by 30,5% a variant 60% (Equal by Internists or Pneumologists). Time door-1st antibiotic dose 6.6 hours. Global Mortality 16.7%. Women died at 87.4 y, men at 84.5 y (p = 0.035). Mortality FINE 3-4-5: 4.5, 12.4, 30% respectively. Mortality treated before 4 hours: 34.6%, after 4 hours: 11.5% (p = 0.01). Many more FINE 5 cases in Int. Medicine than Pneumology. Mortality by Internists 22%. Mortality by Pneumologists 3% (p = 0.001). Mortality similar following strict guidelines or variant.

Conclusions: a) Internist receive patients sicker than Pneumologists; b) Important mortality in these very old patients of 16.7%, and progressive according the FINE severity index, in spite of correct therapy; c) Rapid initiation of Antibiotics did not decreased mortality; d) Mortality did not change following strict or variant Guidelines; and e) There are areas of quality improvement in our Hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信