[某参考医院护理人员吸入器管理评价]。

J Díaz-López, M J Cremades-Romero, F Carrión-Valero, M Maya-Martínez, I Fontana-Sanchís, E Cuevas-Cebrián
{"title":"[某参考医院护理人员吸入器管理评价]。","authors":"J Díaz-López,&nbsp;M J Cremades-Romero,&nbsp;F Carrión-Valero,&nbsp;M Maya-Martínez,&nbsp;I Fontana-Sanchís,&nbsp;E Cuevas-Cebrián","doi":"10.4321/s0212-71992008000300003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the knowledge and skills of nurses on the management of inhaled therapy in different hospitalization wards.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We carried out a cross-sectional study, in which nurses were asked to perform a practical demonstration of the management of a pressurized canister with an inhalation chamber, without previous theoretical instruction about the technique. The inhalation technique was evaluated step by step following the recommendations of the Spanish Society of Pneumologists and Chest Surgeons (SEPAR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We could obtain the participation of 144 of the 177 nurses working in different wards (29 males, 115 females, mean age 42.5 + 7 years). Previous knowledge of the management of inhalers was declared by 85.4%. We found that 70.8% of the nurses did not correctly perform all the steps: 24.5% made only one mistake, while the rest had mistakes in two or more steps. The most common mistakes were: not to perform a slow and deep exhalation before using the inhaler (27.3%), not to hold the breath after the inhalation (24.4%), and not to wait 30 seconds between inhalation manoeuvres (21.5%). When evaluating different wards, we found that 44.4% of the nurses in the Short Stay Unit performed the technique correctly in contrast to 31.3% of the nurses in the Pneumology Ward.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The percentage of mistakes in the inhalation technique by the nursing personnel was high. The health personnel must have an adequate level of training in order to correctly instruct the patient, because the efficacy of inhaled treatment greatly depends on the adequacy of the technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":50798,"journal":{"name":"Anales De Medicina Interna","volume":"25 3","pages":"113-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Evaluation of the management of inhalers by the nursing personnel in a reference hospital].\",\"authors\":\"J Díaz-López,&nbsp;M J Cremades-Romero,&nbsp;F Carrión-Valero,&nbsp;M Maya-Martínez,&nbsp;I Fontana-Sanchís,&nbsp;E Cuevas-Cebrián\",\"doi\":\"10.4321/s0212-71992008000300003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the knowledge and skills of nurses on the management of inhaled therapy in different hospitalization wards.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We carried out a cross-sectional study, in which nurses were asked to perform a practical demonstration of the management of a pressurized canister with an inhalation chamber, without previous theoretical instruction about the technique. The inhalation technique was evaluated step by step following the recommendations of the Spanish Society of Pneumologists and Chest Surgeons (SEPAR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We could obtain the participation of 144 of the 177 nurses working in different wards (29 males, 115 females, mean age 42.5 + 7 years). Previous knowledge of the management of inhalers was declared by 85.4%. We found that 70.8% of the nurses did not correctly perform all the steps: 24.5% made only one mistake, while the rest had mistakes in two or more steps. The most common mistakes were: not to perform a slow and deep exhalation before using the inhaler (27.3%), not to hold the breath after the inhalation (24.4%), and not to wait 30 seconds between inhalation manoeuvres (21.5%). When evaluating different wards, we found that 44.4% of the nurses in the Short Stay Unit performed the technique correctly in contrast to 31.3% of the nurses in the Pneumology Ward.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The percentage of mistakes in the inhalation technique by the nursing personnel was high. The health personnel must have an adequate level of training in order to correctly instruct the patient, because the efficacy of inhaled treatment greatly depends on the adequacy of the technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anales De Medicina Interna\",\"volume\":\"25 3\",\"pages\":\"113-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anales De Medicina Interna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4321/s0212-71992008000300003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales De Medicina Interna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4321/s0212-71992008000300003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的:了解不同病区护士对吸入治疗管理的知识和技能。材料和方法:我们进行了一项横断面研究,要求护士在没有先前的理论指导的情况下进行带吸入室的加压罐管理的实际演示。根据西班牙肺科医师和胸外科医师协会(SEPAR)的建议,逐步评估吸入技术。结果:177名不同病区护士中有144名参与调查,其中男29名,女115名,平均年龄42.5 + 7岁。85.4%的人表示以前对吸入器的管理有了解。我们发现70.8%的护士没有正确执行所有步骤,24.5%的护士只犯了一个错误,其余的护士有两个或两个以上的错误。最常见的错误是:在使用吸入器之前没有进行缓慢而深的呼气(27.3%),在吸气后没有屏住呼吸(24.4%),以及在吸气动作之间没有等待30秒(21.5%)。在对不同病房进行评估时,我们发现44.4%的短期住院病房护士正确执行了这项技术,而肺炎病房的护士正确执行这项技术的比例为31.3%。结论:护理人员对吸入技术的误差率较高。保健人员必须接受适当的培训,以便正确地指导病人,因为吸入治疗的效果在很大程度上取决于技术的适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Evaluation of the management of inhalers by the nursing personnel in a reference hospital].

Objectives: To evaluate the knowledge and skills of nurses on the management of inhaled therapy in different hospitalization wards.

Material and methods: We carried out a cross-sectional study, in which nurses were asked to perform a practical demonstration of the management of a pressurized canister with an inhalation chamber, without previous theoretical instruction about the technique. The inhalation technique was evaluated step by step following the recommendations of the Spanish Society of Pneumologists and Chest Surgeons (SEPAR).

Results: We could obtain the participation of 144 of the 177 nurses working in different wards (29 males, 115 females, mean age 42.5 + 7 years). Previous knowledge of the management of inhalers was declared by 85.4%. We found that 70.8% of the nurses did not correctly perform all the steps: 24.5% made only one mistake, while the rest had mistakes in two or more steps. The most common mistakes were: not to perform a slow and deep exhalation before using the inhaler (27.3%), not to hold the breath after the inhalation (24.4%), and not to wait 30 seconds between inhalation manoeuvres (21.5%). When evaluating different wards, we found that 44.4% of the nurses in the Short Stay Unit performed the technique correctly in contrast to 31.3% of the nurses in the Pneumology Ward.

Conclusions: The percentage of mistakes in the inhalation technique by the nursing personnel was high. The health personnel must have an adequate level of training in order to correctly instruct the patient, because the efficacy of inhaled treatment greatly depends on the adequacy of the technique.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信