共存环境下转基因玉米最佳田间分配的搜索方法。

Environmental biosafety research Pub Date : 2008-04-01 Epub Date: 2008-04-16 DOI:10.1051/ebr:2008004
Yann Devos, Mathias Cougnon, Olivier Thas, Dirk Reheul
{"title":"共存环境下转基因玉米最佳田间分配的搜索方法。","authors":"Yann Devos,&nbsp;Mathias Cougnon,&nbsp;Olivier Thas,&nbsp;Dirk Reheul","doi":"10.1051/ebr:2008004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spatially isolating genetically modified (GM) maize fields from non-GM maize fields is a robust on-farm measure to keep the adventitious presence of GM material in the harvest of neighboring fields due to cross-fertilizations below the European labeling threshold of 0.9%. However, the implementation of mandatory and rigid isolation perimeters can affect the farmers' freedom of choice to grow GM maize on their fields if neighboring farmers do not concur with their respective cropping intentions and crop plans. To minimize the presence of non-GM maize within isolation perimeters implemented around GM maize fields, a method was developed for optimally allocating GM maize to a particular set of fields. Using a Geographic Information System dataset and Monte Carlo analyses, three scenarios were tested in a maize cultivation area with a low maize share in Flanders (Belgium). It was assumed that some farmers would act in collaboration by sharing the allocation of all their arable land for the cultivation of GM maize. From the large number of possible allocations of GM maize to any field of the shared pool of arable land, the best field combinations were selected. Compared to a random allocation of GM maize, the best field combinations made it possible to reduce spatial co-existence problems, since at least two times less non-GM maize fields and their corresponding farmers occurred within the implemented isolation perimeters. In the selected field sets, the mean field size was always larger than the mean field size of the common pool of arable land. These preliminary data confirm that the optimal allocation of GM maize over the landscape might theoretically be a valuable option to facilitate the implementation of rigid isolation perimeters imposed by law.</p>","PeriodicalId":87177,"journal":{"name":"Environmental biosafety research","volume":"7 2","pages":"97-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A method to search for optimal field allocations of transgenic maize in the context of co-existence.\",\"authors\":\"Yann Devos,&nbsp;Mathias Cougnon,&nbsp;Olivier Thas,&nbsp;Dirk Reheul\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/ebr:2008004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Spatially isolating genetically modified (GM) maize fields from non-GM maize fields is a robust on-farm measure to keep the adventitious presence of GM material in the harvest of neighboring fields due to cross-fertilizations below the European labeling threshold of 0.9%. However, the implementation of mandatory and rigid isolation perimeters can affect the farmers' freedom of choice to grow GM maize on their fields if neighboring farmers do not concur with their respective cropping intentions and crop plans. To minimize the presence of non-GM maize within isolation perimeters implemented around GM maize fields, a method was developed for optimally allocating GM maize to a particular set of fields. Using a Geographic Information System dataset and Monte Carlo analyses, three scenarios were tested in a maize cultivation area with a low maize share in Flanders (Belgium). It was assumed that some farmers would act in collaboration by sharing the allocation of all their arable land for the cultivation of GM maize. From the large number of possible allocations of GM maize to any field of the shared pool of arable land, the best field combinations were selected. Compared to a random allocation of GM maize, the best field combinations made it possible to reduce spatial co-existence problems, since at least two times less non-GM maize fields and their corresponding farmers occurred within the implemented isolation perimeters. In the selected field sets, the mean field size was always larger than the mean field size of the common pool of arable land. These preliminary data confirm that the optimal allocation of GM maize over the landscape might theoretically be a valuable option to facilitate the implementation of rigid isolation perimeters imposed by law.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental biosafety research\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"97-104\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental biosafety research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2008004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2008/4/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental biosafety research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2008004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

将转基因玉米田与非转基因玉米田在空间上隔离是一项强有力的农场措施,可以使杂交受精导致的转基因物质在邻近田地收获中的意外存在低于欧洲标签阈值0.9%。然而,如果邻近的农民不同意他们各自的种植意图和种植计划,强制性和严格的隔离周界的实施会影响农民在自己的土地上种植转基因玉米的自由选择。为了最大限度地减少转基因玉米田周围隔离圈内非转基因玉米的存在,研究人员开发了一种将转基因玉米最佳分配到特定一组田地的方法。利用地理信息系统数据集和蒙特卡罗分析,在比利时法兰德斯玉米种植比例较低的玉米种植区对三种情景进行了测试。人们假设一些农民会通过分享他们所有可耕种土地的分配来合作种植转基因玉米。从大量可能分配给共享耕地池的任何一块田的转基因玉米中,选出最佳的田间组合。与随机分配转基因玉米相比,最佳的田间组合可以减少空间共存问题,因为在实施隔离的周界内发生的非转基因玉米田及其相应的农民至少减少了两倍。在选取的田组中,平均田面积始终大于普通耕地池平均田面积。这些初步数据证实,从理论上讲,转基因玉米在土地上的最佳分配可能是促进实施法律规定的严格隔离边界的一个有价值的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A method to search for optimal field allocations of transgenic maize in the context of co-existence.

Spatially isolating genetically modified (GM) maize fields from non-GM maize fields is a robust on-farm measure to keep the adventitious presence of GM material in the harvest of neighboring fields due to cross-fertilizations below the European labeling threshold of 0.9%. However, the implementation of mandatory and rigid isolation perimeters can affect the farmers' freedom of choice to grow GM maize on their fields if neighboring farmers do not concur with their respective cropping intentions and crop plans. To minimize the presence of non-GM maize within isolation perimeters implemented around GM maize fields, a method was developed for optimally allocating GM maize to a particular set of fields. Using a Geographic Information System dataset and Monte Carlo analyses, three scenarios were tested in a maize cultivation area with a low maize share in Flanders (Belgium). It was assumed that some farmers would act in collaboration by sharing the allocation of all their arable land for the cultivation of GM maize. From the large number of possible allocations of GM maize to any field of the shared pool of arable land, the best field combinations were selected. Compared to a random allocation of GM maize, the best field combinations made it possible to reduce spatial co-existence problems, since at least two times less non-GM maize fields and their corresponding farmers occurred within the implemented isolation perimeters. In the selected field sets, the mean field size was always larger than the mean field size of the common pool of arable land. These preliminary data confirm that the optimal allocation of GM maize over the landscape might theoretically be a valuable option to facilitate the implementation of rigid isolation perimeters imposed by law.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信