亚利桑那州避难所的异交棉籽和外来Bt植物。

Environmental biosafety research Pub Date : 2008-04-01 Epub Date: 2008-04-16 DOI:10.1051/ebr:2008005
Shannon Heuberger, Christine Yafuso, Gloria Degrandi-Hoffman, Bruce E Tabashnik, Yves Carrière, Timothy J Dennehy
{"title":"亚利桑那州避难所的异交棉籽和外来Bt植物。","authors":"Shannon Heuberger,&nbsp;Christine Yafuso,&nbsp;Gloria Degrandi-Hoffman,&nbsp;Bruce E Tabashnik,&nbsp;Yves Carrière,&nbsp;Timothy J Dennehy","doi":"10.1051/ebr:2008005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Outcrossing of non-Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum (L.)) in refuges by transgenic Bt cultivars could reduce the efficacy of refuges for delaying resistance in seed-feeding pests. Based on reports that outcrossing decreased as distance from Bt cotton increased in small-scale studies, we hypothesized that increasing refuge width or distance from Bt fields would reduce outcrossing. In a large-scale study in Arizona, we quantified Bt seed in refuges of experimental and commercial fields, comparing outcrossing between in-field (narrow) and external (wide) refuges and among rows of refuges at various distances from Bt fields. Some refuges, including those in tightly controlled experimental plots, contained up to 8% adventitious Bt plants. Some, but not all, Bt plants likely resulted from Bt seed in the non-Bt seed bags. We did not detect a difference in outcrossing between in-field and external refuges. However, statistical power was low because outcrossing was low (< 0.4% of seeds) in both treatments. Higher outcrossing levels (< or = 4.6% of seeds) were observed in the studies measuring outcrossing at various distances from Bt fields, yet outcrossing did not decrease as the distance from Bt fields increased. We hypothesize that Bt plants in refuges cross-pollinated surrounding non-Bt plants, overshadowing the expected association between distance from Bt fields and outcrossing.</p>","PeriodicalId":87177,"journal":{"name":"Environmental biosafety research","volume":"7 2","pages":"87-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcrossed cottonseed and adventitious Bt plants in Arizona refuges.\",\"authors\":\"Shannon Heuberger,&nbsp;Christine Yafuso,&nbsp;Gloria Degrandi-Hoffman,&nbsp;Bruce E Tabashnik,&nbsp;Yves Carrière,&nbsp;Timothy J Dennehy\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/ebr:2008005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Outcrossing of non-Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum (L.)) in refuges by transgenic Bt cultivars could reduce the efficacy of refuges for delaying resistance in seed-feeding pests. Based on reports that outcrossing decreased as distance from Bt cotton increased in small-scale studies, we hypothesized that increasing refuge width or distance from Bt fields would reduce outcrossing. In a large-scale study in Arizona, we quantified Bt seed in refuges of experimental and commercial fields, comparing outcrossing between in-field (narrow) and external (wide) refuges and among rows of refuges at various distances from Bt fields. Some refuges, including those in tightly controlled experimental plots, contained up to 8% adventitious Bt plants. Some, but not all, Bt plants likely resulted from Bt seed in the non-Bt seed bags. We did not detect a difference in outcrossing between in-field and external refuges. However, statistical power was low because outcrossing was low (< 0.4% of seeds) in both treatments. Higher outcrossing levels (< or = 4.6% of seeds) were observed in the studies measuring outcrossing at various distances from Bt fields, yet outcrossing did not decrease as the distance from Bt fields increased. We hypothesize that Bt plants in refuges cross-pollinated surrounding non-Bt plants, overshadowing the expected association between distance from Bt fields and outcrossing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental biosafety research\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"87-96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental biosafety research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2008005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2008/4/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental biosafety research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ebr:2008005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2008/4/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

非Bt棉花(Gossypium hirsutum (L.))在保育区与转基因Bt品种异种杂交会降低保育区对取食种子害虫的延迟抗性效果。在小规模的研究中,异型杂交随着与Bt棉花距离的增加而减少,我们假设增加避难所的宽度或与Bt田的距离会减少异型杂交。在亚利桑那州的一项大规模研究中,我们量化了实验田和商业田避难所中的Bt种子,比较了田间(窄)和外部(宽)避难所以及距离Bt田不同距离的一排排避难所之间的异种杂交。一些避难所,包括那些严格控制的试验田,含有高达8%的外来Bt植物。一些(但不是全部)Bt植物可能是由非Bt种子袋中的Bt种子产生的。我们没有发现野地和外部避难所异种杂交的差异。但两种处理的异交率均较低(< 0.4%),统计效力较低。在距离Bt田不同距离的研究中观察到较高的异交水平(<或= 4.6%的种子),但异交并没有随着距离Bt田的增加而减少。我们假设,避难所的Bt植物与周围的非Bt植物异花授粉,掩盖了与Bt田距离和异交之间的预期联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcrossed cottonseed and adventitious Bt plants in Arizona refuges.

Outcrossing of non-Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum (L.)) in refuges by transgenic Bt cultivars could reduce the efficacy of refuges for delaying resistance in seed-feeding pests. Based on reports that outcrossing decreased as distance from Bt cotton increased in small-scale studies, we hypothesized that increasing refuge width or distance from Bt fields would reduce outcrossing. In a large-scale study in Arizona, we quantified Bt seed in refuges of experimental and commercial fields, comparing outcrossing between in-field (narrow) and external (wide) refuges and among rows of refuges at various distances from Bt fields. Some refuges, including those in tightly controlled experimental plots, contained up to 8% adventitious Bt plants. Some, but not all, Bt plants likely resulted from Bt seed in the non-Bt seed bags. We did not detect a difference in outcrossing between in-field and external refuges. However, statistical power was low because outcrossing was low (< 0.4% of seeds) in both treatments. Higher outcrossing levels (< or = 4.6% of seeds) were observed in the studies measuring outcrossing at various distances from Bt fields, yet outcrossing did not decrease as the distance from Bt fields increased. We hypothesize that Bt plants in refuges cross-pollinated surrounding non-Bt plants, overshadowing the expected association between distance from Bt fields and outcrossing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信