支撑强度量表(SIS)的量表间信度。

James R Thompson, Marc J Tassé, Colleen A McLaughlin
{"title":"支撑强度量表(SIS)的量表间信度。","authors":"James R Thompson,&nbsp;Marc J Tassé,&nbsp;Colleen A McLaughlin","doi":"10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[231:IROTSI]2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The interrater reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) was investigated under the condition that interviewers had to have been trained and/or experienced in its administration and scoring. Both corrected and noncorrected Pearson's product-moment coefficients were generated to assess interinterviewer, interrespondent, and mixed interrater reliability. The correlation coefficients for the SIS Support Needs Index Score and SIS subscale scores were considerably higher than coefficients reported in the SIS Users Manual that were derived from a similar study conducted with untrained, inexperienced interviewers.</p>","PeriodicalId":76991,"journal":{"name":"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR","volume":"113 3","pages":"231-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[231:IROTSI]2.0.CO;2","citationCount":"49","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrater reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS).\",\"authors\":\"James R Thompson,&nbsp;Marc J Tassé,&nbsp;Colleen A McLaughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[231:IROTSI]2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The interrater reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) was investigated under the condition that interviewers had to have been trained and/or experienced in its administration and scoring. Both corrected and noncorrected Pearson's product-moment coefficients were generated to assess interinterviewer, interrespondent, and mixed interrater reliability. The correlation coefficients for the SIS Support Needs Index Score and SIS subscale scores were considerably higher than coefficients reported in the SIS Users Manual that were derived from a similar study conducted with untrained, inexperienced interviewers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR\",\"volume\":\"113 3\",\"pages\":\"231-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[231:IROTSI]2.0.CO;2\",\"citationCount\":\"49\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[231:IROTSI]2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2008)113[231:IROTSI]2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

摘要

对支持强度量表(SIS)的互译者可靠性进行了调查,条件是采访者必须在其管理和评分方面受过培训和/或有经验。生成校正和未校正的Pearson积矩系数,以评估访谈者、访谈者和混合interterater的信度。SIS支持需求指数得分和SIS子量表得分的相关系数远远高于SIS用户手册中报告的系数,该手册是由未经培训、没有经验的采访者进行的类似研究得出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interrater reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS).

The interrater reliability of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) was investigated under the condition that interviewers had to have been trained and/or experienced in its administration and scoring. Both corrected and noncorrected Pearson's product-moment coefficients were generated to assess interinterviewer, interrespondent, and mixed interrater reliability. The correlation coefficients for the SIS Support Needs Index Score and SIS subscale scores were considerably higher than coefficients reported in the SIS Users Manual that were derived from a similar study conducted with untrained, inexperienced interviewers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信