呼气末正压改变未成熟新生兔对重组和天然外源性表面活性剂的反应。

Biology of the neonate Pub Date : 2006-01-01 Epub Date: 2005-09-06 DOI:10.1159/000093820
Anne Hilgendorff, Irwin Reiss, Clemens Ruppert, Thilo Hanfstingl, Ann Sophie Seliger, Andreas Gunther, Michael Ebsen, Ludwig Gortner
{"title":"呼气末正压改变未成熟新生兔对重组和天然外源性表面活性剂的反应。","authors":"Anne Hilgendorff,&nbsp;Irwin Reiss,&nbsp;Clemens Ruppert,&nbsp;Thilo Hanfstingl,&nbsp;Ann Sophie Seliger,&nbsp;Andreas Gunther,&nbsp;Michael Ebsen,&nbsp;Ludwig Gortner","doi":"10.1159/000093820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Different types of surfactant preparations were shown not to exert uniform response in preterm infants suffering from respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Therefore, the effects of a recombinant surfactant protein C (rSP-C) based preparation and a natural surfactant were compared applying different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in experimental RDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preterm rabbits (n = 7-14 per group; 27 days gestation; term 30 days) were randomized for receiving either 100 mg/kg rSP-C or natural bovine surfactant and were compared with saline treated controls. Animals were ventilated for 30 min with either 0.3 or 0 kPa PEEP at standardized tidal volumes and lung mechanics were measured as well as lung histology and mRNA expression of surfactant associated proteins B and C by real-time PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PEEP level applied (0.3 vs. 0 kPa) largely influenced dynamic compliance after administration of rSP-C surfactant (4.45 vs. 2.58 ml/kg), whereas natural surfactant improved compliance regardless of the PEEP applied (4.86 vs. 4.24 ml/kg) compared to controls (2.41 vs. 1.55 ml/kg). Accordingly, administration of PEEP significantly increased alveolar count in all groups as well as SP-C mRNA expression, whereas SP-B expression and protein content both remained unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Response to rSP-C surfactant depends on the PEEP level applied in our model of neonatal RDS. These findings should be considered for the conception of clinical trials regarding treatment strategies in neonatal RDS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9091,"journal":{"name":"Biology of the neonate","volume":"90 3","pages":"210-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000093820","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positive end-expiratory pressure modifies response to recombinant and natural exogenous surfactant in ventilated immature newborn rabbits.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Hilgendorff,&nbsp;Irwin Reiss,&nbsp;Clemens Ruppert,&nbsp;Thilo Hanfstingl,&nbsp;Ann Sophie Seliger,&nbsp;Andreas Gunther,&nbsp;Michael Ebsen,&nbsp;Ludwig Gortner\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000093820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Different types of surfactant preparations were shown not to exert uniform response in preterm infants suffering from respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Therefore, the effects of a recombinant surfactant protein C (rSP-C) based preparation and a natural surfactant were compared applying different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in experimental RDS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Preterm rabbits (n = 7-14 per group; 27 days gestation; term 30 days) were randomized for receiving either 100 mg/kg rSP-C or natural bovine surfactant and were compared with saline treated controls. Animals were ventilated for 30 min with either 0.3 or 0 kPa PEEP at standardized tidal volumes and lung mechanics were measured as well as lung histology and mRNA expression of surfactant associated proteins B and C by real-time PCR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PEEP level applied (0.3 vs. 0 kPa) largely influenced dynamic compliance after administration of rSP-C surfactant (4.45 vs. 2.58 ml/kg), whereas natural surfactant improved compliance regardless of the PEEP applied (4.86 vs. 4.24 ml/kg) compared to controls (2.41 vs. 1.55 ml/kg). Accordingly, administration of PEEP significantly increased alveolar count in all groups as well as SP-C mRNA expression, whereas SP-B expression and protein content both remained unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Response to rSP-C surfactant depends on the PEEP level applied in our model of neonatal RDS. These findings should be considered for the conception of clinical trials regarding treatment strategies in neonatal RDS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology of the neonate\",\"volume\":\"90 3\",\"pages\":\"210-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000093820\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology of the neonate\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000093820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2005/9/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of the neonate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000093820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2005/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

背景与目的:不同类型的表面活性剂制剂对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的疗效不一致。因此,我们比较了基于重组表面活性剂蛋白C (rSP-C)的制剂和天然表面活性剂在不同呼气末正压(PEEP)水平下的RDS实验效果。方法:每组早产兔7 ~ 14只;妊娠27天;第30天)随机接受100 mg/kg rSP-C或天然牛表面活性剂,并与生理盐水处理的对照组进行比较。在标准潮气量下,以0.3或0 kPa PEEP通气30 min,采用实时荧光定量PCR检测肺力学、肺组织学和表面活性剂相关蛋白B、C mRNA表达。结果:施加的PEEP水平(0.3 vs. 0 kPa)在很大程度上影响了给予rSP-C表面活性剂后的动态顺应性(4.45 vs. 2.58 ml/kg),而与对照组(2.41 vs. 1.55 ml/kg)相比,天然表面活性剂提高了顺应性(4.86 vs. 4.24 ml/kg)。因此,给药PEEP显著增加各组肺泡计数和SP-C mRNA表达,而SP-B表达和蛋白质含量均保持不变。结论:在我们的新生儿RDS模型中,对rSP-C表面活性剂的反应取决于PEEP水平。这些发现应该考虑到新生儿RDS治疗策略的临床试验概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Positive end-expiratory pressure modifies response to recombinant and natural exogenous surfactant in ventilated immature newborn rabbits.

Background and objectives: Different types of surfactant preparations were shown not to exert uniform response in preterm infants suffering from respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Therefore, the effects of a recombinant surfactant protein C (rSP-C) based preparation and a natural surfactant were compared applying different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in experimental RDS.

Methods: Preterm rabbits (n = 7-14 per group; 27 days gestation; term 30 days) were randomized for receiving either 100 mg/kg rSP-C or natural bovine surfactant and were compared with saline treated controls. Animals were ventilated for 30 min with either 0.3 or 0 kPa PEEP at standardized tidal volumes and lung mechanics were measured as well as lung histology and mRNA expression of surfactant associated proteins B and C by real-time PCR.

Results: The PEEP level applied (0.3 vs. 0 kPa) largely influenced dynamic compliance after administration of rSP-C surfactant (4.45 vs. 2.58 ml/kg), whereas natural surfactant improved compliance regardless of the PEEP applied (4.86 vs. 4.24 ml/kg) compared to controls (2.41 vs. 1.55 ml/kg). Accordingly, administration of PEEP significantly increased alveolar count in all groups as well as SP-C mRNA expression, whereas SP-B expression and protein content both remained unchanged.

Conclusion: Response to rSP-C surfactant depends on the PEEP level applied in our model of neonatal RDS. These findings should be considered for the conception of clinical trials regarding treatment strategies in neonatal RDS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信