肿瘤异质性:食管癌增殖指数活检评估中的一个问题。

K Jenner, S J Darnton, L Billingham, A T Warfield, H R Matthews
{"title":"肿瘤异质性:食管癌增殖指数活检评估中的一个问题。","authors":"K Jenner,&nbsp;S J Darnton,&nbsp;L Billingham,&nbsp;A T Warfield,&nbsp;H R Matthews","doi":"10.1136/mp.49.1.m61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tumour heterogeneity may pose a problem when biopsy specimens are taken to measure proliferation (for example, in assessing response to therapy). Two \"biopsy specimens\" were taken from the centre and two from the edge of the luminal surface of 20 resected oesophageal adenocarcinomas. The proliferation index for each \"biopsy specimen\" was measured by counting Ki67 labelled nuclei in histological sections. The proliferation index was not associated with tumour differentiation or stage. There was site specific heterogeneity with a significant difference in proliferation index between the central (mean (SD) 36.4 (9.7)) and edge \"biopsy specimens\" (39.3 (9.9)). There was, however, a wide range of differences between pairs of \"biopsy specimens\" from both sites. In conclusion, if a tumour is to be sampled for measurement of the proliferation index before and after treatment, then the sequential biopsy specimens (preferably duplicated on each occasion) should be taken consistently from a leading edge of the lesion.</p>","PeriodicalId":87395,"journal":{"name":"Clinical molecular pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/mp.49.1.m61","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumour heterogeneity: a problem in biopsy assessment of the proliferation index of oesophageal adenocarcinomas.\",\"authors\":\"K Jenner,&nbsp;S J Darnton,&nbsp;L Billingham,&nbsp;A T Warfield,&nbsp;H R Matthews\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/mp.49.1.m61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tumour heterogeneity may pose a problem when biopsy specimens are taken to measure proliferation (for example, in assessing response to therapy). Two \\\"biopsy specimens\\\" were taken from the centre and two from the edge of the luminal surface of 20 resected oesophageal adenocarcinomas. The proliferation index for each \\\"biopsy specimen\\\" was measured by counting Ki67 labelled nuclei in histological sections. The proliferation index was not associated with tumour differentiation or stage. There was site specific heterogeneity with a significant difference in proliferation index between the central (mean (SD) 36.4 (9.7)) and edge \\\"biopsy specimens\\\" (39.3 (9.9)). There was, however, a wide range of differences between pairs of \\\"biopsy specimens\\\" from both sites. In conclusion, if a tumour is to be sampled for measurement of the proliferation index before and after treatment, then the sequential biopsy specimens (preferably duplicated on each occasion) should be taken consistently from a leading edge of the lesion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical molecular pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/mp.49.1.m61\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical molecular pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/mp.49.1.m61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical molecular pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/mp.49.1.m61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

当取活检标本测量增殖时(例如,在评估对治疗的反应时),肿瘤异质性可能会造成问题。从20例切除的食管腺癌的中心取两个“活检标本”,从腔面边缘取两个“活检标本”。每个“活检标本”的增殖指数是通过计数Ki67标记的细胞核在组织学切片。增殖指数与肿瘤分化或分期无关。中心(平均(SD) 36.4(9.7))和边缘“活检标本”(39.3(9.9))的增殖指数存在显著差异,存在部位特异性异质性。然而,来自两个部位的“活检标本”对之间存在很大差异。总之,如果要在治疗前后取样测量肿瘤的增殖指数,则应从病变的前沿连续取样活检标本(每次最好重复一次)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tumour heterogeneity: a problem in biopsy assessment of the proliferation index of oesophageal adenocarcinomas.

Tumour heterogeneity may pose a problem when biopsy specimens are taken to measure proliferation (for example, in assessing response to therapy). Two "biopsy specimens" were taken from the centre and two from the edge of the luminal surface of 20 resected oesophageal adenocarcinomas. The proliferation index for each "biopsy specimen" was measured by counting Ki67 labelled nuclei in histological sections. The proliferation index was not associated with tumour differentiation or stage. There was site specific heterogeneity with a significant difference in proliferation index between the central (mean (SD) 36.4 (9.7)) and edge "biopsy specimens" (39.3 (9.9)). There was, however, a wide range of differences between pairs of "biopsy specimens" from both sites. In conclusion, if a tumour is to be sampled for measurement of the proliferation index before and after treatment, then the sequential biopsy specimens (preferably duplicated on each occasion) should be taken consistently from a leading edge of the lesion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信