有或没有智力迟钝的人对选择性注意任务的干扰和抑制。

Edward C Merrill
{"title":"有或没有智力迟钝的人对选择性注意任务的干扰和抑制。","authors":"Edward C Merrill","doi":"10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[216:IAIITO]2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persons with mental retardation often exhibit greater interference in visual selective attention tasks than do persons matched with them on CA. My goal here was to evaluate whether differences in distractor interference between persons with and without mental retardation may be related to differences in negative priming. Fifteen participants with mental retardation, 15 without mental retardation matched on CA, and 15 without mental retardation matched on MA participated in three selective attention tasks, which were chosen to elicit small, medium, and large group differences in interference, respectively. The failure to engage in inhibitory processes by the participants with mental retardation in these tasks of selective attention was related to increased distractor interference.</p>","PeriodicalId":76991,"journal":{"name":"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR","volume":"111 3","pages":"216-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[216:IAIITO]2.0.CO;2","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interference and inhibition in tasks of selective attention by persons with and without mental retardation.\",\"authors\":\"Edward C Merrill\",\"doi\":\"10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[216:IAIITO]2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Persons with mental retardation often exhibit greater interference in visual selective attention tasks than do persons matched with them on CA. My goal here was to evaluate whether differences in distractor interference between persons with and without mental retardation may be related to differences in negative priming. Fifteen participants with mental retardation, 15 without mental retardation matched on CA, and 15 without mental retardation matched on MA participated in three selective attention tasks, which were chosen to elicit small, medium, and large group differences in interference, respectively. The failure to engage in inhibitory processes by the participants with mental retardation in these tasks of selective attention was related to increased distractor interference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR\",\"volume\":\"111 3\",\"pages\":\"216-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[216:IAIITO]2.0.CO;2\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[216:IAIITO]2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[216:IAIITO]2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

智力迟钝的人在视觉选择性注意任务中往往比与其匹配的人表现出更大的干扰。我在这里的目的是评估有智力迟钝和没有智力迟钝的人在分心物干扰方面的差异是否可能与负启动的差异有关。15名智力发育迟滞者、15名非智力发育迟滞者和15名非智力发育迟滞者分别参与了3个选择性注意任务,分别产生了小、中、大组干扰差异。智力低下的参与者在选择性注意任务中未能参与抑制过程与干扰物干扰的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interference and inhibition in tasks of selective attention by persons with and without mental retardation.

Persons with mental retardation often exhibit greater interference in visual selective attention tasks than do persons matched with them on CA. My goal here was to evaluate whether differences in distractor interference between persons with and without mental retardation may be related to differences in negative priming. Fifteen participants with mental retardation, 15 without mental retardation matched on CA, and 15 without mental retardation matched on MA participated in three selective attention tasks, which were chosen to elicit small, medium, and large group differences in interference, respectively. The failure to engage in inhibitory processes by the participants with mental retardation in these tasks of selective attention was related to increased distractor interference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信