{"title":"有或没有智力迟钝的人对选择性注意任务的干扰和抑制。","authors":"Edward C Merrill","doi":"10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[216:IAIITO]2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Persons with mental retardation often exhibit greater interference in visual selective attention tasks than do persons matched with them on CA. My goal here was to evaluate whether differences in distractor interference between persons with and without mental retardation may be related to differences in negative priming. Fifteen participants with mental retardation, 15 without mental retardation matched on CA, and 15 without mental retardation matched on MA participated in three selective attention tasks, which were chosen to elicit small, medium, and large group differences in interference, respectively. The failure to engage in inhibitory processes by the participants with mental retardation in these tasks of selective attention was related to increased distractor interference.</p>","PeriodicalId":76991,"journal":{"name":"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR","volume":"111 3","pages":"216-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[216:IAIITO]2.0.CO;2","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interference and inhibition in tasks of selective attention by persons with and without mental retardation.\",\"authors\":\"Edward C Merrill\",\"doi\":\"10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[216:IAIITO]2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Persons with mental retardation often exhibit greater interference in visual selective attention tasks than do persons matched with them on CA. My goal here was to evaluate whether differences in distractor interference between persons with and without mental retardation may be related to differences in negative priming. Fifteen participants with mental retardation, 15 without mental retardation matched on CA, and 15 without mental retardation matched on MA participated in three selective attention tasks, which were chosen to elicit small, medium, and large group differences in interference, respectively. The failure to engage in inhibitory processes by the participants with mental retardation in these tasks of selective attention was related to increased distractor interference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR\",\"volume\":\"111 3\",\"pages\":\"216-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[216:IAIITO]2.0.CO;2\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[216:IAIITO]2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[216:IAIITO]2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interference and inhibition in tasks of selective attention by persons with and without mental retardation.
Persons with mental retardation often exhibit greater interference in visual selective attention tasks than do persons matched with them on CA. My goal here was to evaluate whether differences in distractor interference between persons with and without mental retardation may be related to differences in negative priming. Fifteen participants with mental retardation, 15 without mental retardation matched on CA, and 15 without mental retardation matched on MA participated in three selective attention tasks, which were chosen to elicit small, medium, and large group differences in interference, respectively. The failure to engage in inhibitory processes by the participants with mental retardation in these tasks of selective attention was related to increased distractor interference.