轻至中度智力障碍患者的社会情感理解和频繁攻击行为。

Andrew Jahoda, Carol Pert, Peter Trower
{"title":"轻至中度智力障碍患者的社会情感理解和频繁攻击行为。","authors":"Andrew Jahoda,&nbsp;Carol Pert,&nbsp;Peter Trower","doi":"10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[77:SUAFAI]2.0.CO;2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aggression in a proportion of people with intellectual disabilities is often assumed to be due to social-cognitive deficits. We reported on two studies in which we compared the emotion recognition and perspective-taking abilities of 43 frequently aggressive individuals and 46 nonaggressive peers. No difference was found between the groups' ability to label facial affect. The perspective-taking task required participants to distinguish between reactions of angry versus calm characters. Although both groups had similar success with elements of the task, the aggressive group proved better at predicting characters' attributions. Results suggest that deficits in emotion recognition and perspective-taking cannot be assumed to be causal or maintaining factors of frequent aggression. This has implications for assessment and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":76991,"journal":{"name":"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR","volume":"111 2","pages":"77-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[77:SUAFAI]2.0.CO;2","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Socioemotional understanding and frequent aggression in people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Jahoda,&nbsp;Carol Pert,&nbsp;Peter Trower\",\"doi\":\"10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[77:SUAFAI]2.0.CO;2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aggression in a proportion of people with intellectual disabilities is often assumed to be due to social-cognitive deficits. We reported on two studies in which we compared the emotion recognition and perspective-taking abilities of 43 frequently aggressive individuals and 46 nonaggressive peers. No difference was found between the groups' ability to label facial affect. The perspective-taking task required participants to distinguish between reactions of angry versus calm characters. Although both groups had similar success with elements of the task, the aggressive group proved better at predicting characters' attributions. Results suggest that deficits in emotion recognition and perspective-taking cannot be assumed to be causal or maintaining factors of frequent aggression. This has implications for assessment and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR\",\"volume\":\"111 2\",\"pages\":\"77-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[77:SUAFAI]2.0.CO;2\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[77:SUAFAI]2.0.CO;2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of mental retardation : AJMR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[77:SUAFAI]2.0.CO;2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

一部分智障人士的攻击性通常被认为是由于社会认知缺陷造成的。我们报告了两项研究,我们比较了43名经常具有攻击性的个体和46名不具有攻击性的同伴的情绪识别和换位思考能力。两组之间对面部表情的识别能力没有差异。换位思考任务要求参与者区分愤怒角色和冷静角色的反应。尽管两组在完成任务的部分上都取得了相似的成功,但事实证明,攻击性强的那一组在预测角色的归因方面做得更好。结果表明,情绪识别和换位思考的缺陷不能被认为是频繁攻击的原因或维持因素。这对评估和治疗有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Socioemotional understanding and frequent aggression in people with mild to moderate intellectual disabilities.

Aggression in a proportion of people with intellectual disabilities is often assumed to be due to social-cognitive deficits. We reported on two studies in which we compared the emotion recognition and perspective-taking abilities of 43 frequently aggressive individuals and 46 nonaggressive peers. No difference was found between the groups' ability to label facial affect. The perspective-taking task required participants to distinguish between reactions of angry versus calm characters. Although both groups had similar success with elements of the task, the aggressive group proved better at predicting characters' attributions. Results suggest that deficits in emotion recognition and perspective-taking cannot be assumed to be causal or maintaining factors of frequent aggression. This has implications for assessment and treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信