肿瘤形态、癌变和遗传不稳定性:背景。

EXS Pub Date : 2006-01-01 DOI:10.1007/3-7643-7378-4_1
Leon P Bignold, B L D Coghlan, H P A Jersmann
{"title":"肿瘤形态、癌变和遗传不稳定性:背景。","authors":"Leon P Bignold,&nbsp;B L D Coghlan,&nbsp;H P A Jersmann","doi":"10.1007/3-7643-7378-4_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Morphological abnormalities of both the nuclei and the cell bodies of tumour cells were described by Müller in the late 1830s. Abnormalities of mitoses and chromosomes in tumour cells were described in the late 1880s. Von Hansemann, in the 1890s, suggested that tumour cells develop from normal cells because of a tendency to mal-distribution and other changes of chromosomes occurring during mitosis. In the first decades of the 20th century, Mendelian genetics and \"gene mapping\" of chromosomes were established, and the dominant or recessive bases of the familial predispositions to certain tumour types were recognised. In the same period, the carcinogenic effects of ionising radiations, of certain chemicals and of particular viruses were described. A well-developed \"somatic gene-mutational theory\" of tumours was postulated by Bauer in 1928. In support of this, in the next three decades, many environmental agents were found to cause mitotic and chromosomal abnormalities in normal cells as well as mutations in germ-line cells of experimental animals. Nevertheless, mitotic, chromosomal, and other mutational theories were not popular explanations of tumour pathogenesis in the first half of the 20th century. Only in the 1960s did somatic mutational mechanisms come to dominate theories of tumour formation, especially as a result of the discoveries of the reactivity of carcinogens with DNA, and that the mutation responsible for xeroderma pigmentosum causes loss of function of a gene involved in the repair of DNA after damage by ultraviolet light (Cleaver in 1968). To explain the complexity of tumourous phenomena, \"multi-hit\" models gained popularity over \"single-hit\" models of somatic mutation, and \"epigenetic\" mechanisms of gene regulation began to be studied in tumour cells. More recently, the documentation of much larger-than-expected numbers of genomic events in tumour cells (by Stoler and co-workers, in 1999) has raised the issue of somatic genetic instability in tumour cells, a field which was pioneered in the 1970s mainly by Loeb. Here these discoveries are traced, beginning with \"nuclear instability\" though mitotic-and-chromosomal theories, single somatic mutation theories, \"multi-hit\" somatic theories, \"somatic, non-chromosomal, genetic instability\" and epigenetic mechanisms in tumour cells as a background to the chapters which follow.</p>","PeriodicalId":77125,"journal":{"name":"EXS","volume":" 96","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/3-7643-7378-4_1","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cancer morphology, carcinogenesis and genetic instability: a background.\",\"authors\":\"Leon P Bignold,&nbsp;B L D Coghlan,&nbsp;H P A Jersmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/3-7643-7378-4_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Morphological abnormalities of both the nuclei and the cell bodies of tumour cells were described by Müller in the late 1830s. Abnormalities of mitoses and chromosomes in tumour cells were described in the late 1880s. Von Hansemann, in the 1890s, suggested that tumour cells develop from normal cells because of a tendency to mal-distribution and other changes of chromosomes occurring during mitosis. In the first decades of the 20th century, Mendelian genetics and \\\"gene mapping\\\" of chromosomes were established, and the dominant or recessive bases of the familial predispositions to certain tumour types were recognised. In the same period, the carcinogenic effects of ionising radiations, of certain chemicals and of particular viruses were described. A well-developed \\\"somatic gene-mutational theory\\\" of tumours was postulated by Bauer in 1928. In support of this, in the next three decades, many environmental agents were found to cause mitotic and chromosomal abnormalities in normal cells as well as mutations in germ-line cells of experimental animals. Nevertheless, mitotic, chromosomal, and other mutational theories were not popular explanations of tumour pathogenesis in the first half of the 20th century. Only in the 1960s did somatic mutational mechanisms come to dominate theories of tumour formation, especially as a result of the discoveries of the reactivity of carcinogens with DNA, and that the mutation responsible for xeroderma pigmentosum causes loss of function of a gene involved in the repair of DNA after damage by ultraviolet light (Cleaver in 1968). To explain the complexity of tumourous phenomena, \\\"multi-hit\\\" models gained popularity over \\\"single-hit\\\" models of somatic mutation, and \\\"epigenetic\\\" mechanisms of gene regulation began to be studied in tumour cells. More recently, the documentation of much larger-than-expected numbers of genomic events in tumour cells (by Stoler and co-workers, in 1999) has raised the issue of somatic genetic instability in tumour cells, a field which was pioneered in the 1970s mainly by Loeb. Here these discoveries are traced, beginning with \\\"nuclear instability\\\" though mitotic-and-chromosomal theories, single somatic mutation theories, \\\"multi-hit\\\" somatic theories, \\\"somatic, non-chromosomal, genetic instability\\\" and epigenetic mechanisms in tumour cells as a background to the chapters which follow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EXS\",\"volume\":\" 96\",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/3-7643-7378-4_1\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EXS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7643-7378-4_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EXS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/3-7643-7378-4_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

19世纪30年代末,m ller描述了肿瘤细胞的细胞核和细胞体的形态异常。肿瘤细胞中有丝分裂和染色体的异常在19世纪80年代末被描述。Von Hansemann在19世纪90年代提出,肿瘤细胞是由正常细胞发展而来的,因为有丝分裂过程中染色体的分布和其他变化倾向于不正常分布。在20世纪的头几十年,孟德尔遗传学和染色体的“基因定位”得以建立,某些肿瘤类型的家族性易感性的显性或隐性基础得到了认识。在同一时期,还描述了电离辐射、某些化学品和特定病毒的致癌作用。鲍尔在1928年提出了一个完善的肿瘤“体细胞基因突变理论”。为了支持这一点,在接下来的三十年中,许多环境因素被发现会导致正常细胞的有丝分裂和染色体异常,以及实验动物的生殖系细胞的突变。然而,在20世纪上半叶,有丝分裂、染色体和其他突变理论并不是肿瘤发病机制的流行解释。仅在20世纪60年代,体细胞突变机制才开始主导肿瘤形成的理论,特别是由于发现了致癌物与DNA的反应性,以及导致色素干皮病的突变导致参与DNA损伤后修复的基因功能丧失(Cleaver, 1968年)。为了解释肿瘤现象的复杂性,“多打击”模型比“单打击”体细胞突变模型更受欢迎,并且开始研究肿瘤细胞中基因调控的“表观遗传”机制。最近,肿瘤细胞中大量的基因组事件的记录(由Stoler和他的同事在1999年完成)提出了肿瘤细胞中体细胞遗传不稳定性的问题,这一领域在20世纪70年代主要是由Loeb开创的。这里追踪这些发现,从“核不稳定性”开始,通过有丝分裂和染色体理论,单一体细胞突变理论,“多打击”体细胞理论,“体细胞,非染色体,遗传不稳定性”和肿瘤细胞中的表观遗传机制作为后续章节的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cancer morphology, carcinogenesis and genetic instability: a background.

Morphological abnormalities of both the nuclei and the cell bodies of tumour cells were described by Müller in the late 1830s. Abnormalities of mitoses and chromosomes in tumour cells were described in the late 1880s. Von Hansemann, in the 1890s, suggested that tumour cells develop from normal cells because of a tendency to mal-distribution and other changes of chromosomes occurring during mitosis. In the first decades of the 20th century, Mendelian genetics and "gene mapping" of chromosomes were established, and the dominant or recessive bases of the familial predispositions to certain tumour types were recognised. In the same period, the carcinogenic effects of ionising radiations, of certain chemicals and of particular viruses were described. A well-developed "somatic gene-mutational theory" of tumours was postulated by Bauer in 1928. In support of this, in the next three decades, many environmental agents were found to cause mitotic and chromosomal abnormalities in normal cells as well as mutations in germ-line cells of experimental animals. Nevertheless, mitotic, chromosomal, and other mutational theories were not popular explanations of tumour pathogenesis in the first half of the 20th century. Only in the 1960s did somatic mutational mechanisms come to dominate theories of tumour formation, especially as a result of the discoveries of the reactivity of carcinogens with DNA, and that the mutation responsible for xeroderma pigmentosum causes loss of function of a gene involved in the repair of DNA after damage by ultraviolet light (Cleaver in 1968). To explain the complexity of tumourous phenomena, "multi-hit" models gained popularity over "single-hit" models of somatic mutation, and "epigenetic" mechanisms of gene regulation began to be studied in tumour cells. More recently, the documentation of much larger-than-expected numbers of genomic events in tumour cells (by Stoler and co-workers, in 1999) has raised the issue of somatic genetic instability in tumour cells, a field which was pioneered in the 1970s mainly by Loeb. Here these discoveries are traced, beginning with "nuclear instability" though mitotic-and-chromosomal theories, single somatic mutation theories, "multi-hit" somatic theories, "somatic, non-chromosomal, genetic instability" and epigenetic mechanisms in tumour cells as a background to the chapters which follow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EXS
EXS
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信