自给式呼吸器(SCBA)对通气功能和极限运动的影响。

Neil D Eves, Richard L Jones, Stewart R Petersen
{"title":"自给式呼吸器(SCBA)对通气功能和极限运动的影响。","authors":"Neil D Eves, Richard L Jones, Stewart R Petersen","doi":"10.1139/h05-137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our previous work showed that breathing low density gases during exercise with the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) improves maximal ventilation (V(E)) and maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2)max). This suggests that the SCBA limits exercise by adding a resistive load to breathing. In this study we compared VO(2)max with and without the various components comprising the SCBA to determine their impact on VO(2)max. Twelve males performed 4 randomly ordered incremental exercise tests to exhaustion on a treadmill: (1) low-resistance breathing valve only (CON); (2) full SCBA (SCBA); (3) SCBA regulator only (REG); and (4) carrying the cylinder and harness assembly but breathing through a low-resistance breathing valve (PACK). Compared to CON, VO(2)max was reduced to a similar extent in the SCBA and REG trials (14.9% and 13.1%, respectively). The PACK condition also reduced VO(2)max, but to a lesser extent (4.8 +/- 5.3%). At VO(2)max, VE was decreased and expiratory mouth pressure and external breathing resistance (BR) were increased in both the SCBA and REG trials. There was a significant correlation between the change in maximal V(E)and VO(2)max with the SCBA. The results show that the SCBA reduces VO(2)max by limiting V(E) secondary to the increased BR of the SCBA regulator.","PeriodicalId":79394,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee","volume":"30 5","pages":"507-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1139/h05-137","citationCount":"56","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) on ventilatory function and maximal exercise.\",\"authors\":\"Neil D Eves, Richard L Jones, Stewart R Petersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/h05-137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our previous work showed that breathing low density gases during exercise with the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) improves maximal ventilation (V(E)) and maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2)max). This suggests that the SCBA limits exercise by adding a resistive load to breathing. In this study we compared VO(2)max with and without the various components comprising the SCBA to determine their impact on VO(2)max. Twelve males performed 4 randomly ordered incremental exercise tests to exhaustion on a treadmill: (1) low-resistance breathing valve only (CON); (2) full SCBA (SCBA); (3) SCBA regulator only (REG); and (4) carrying the cylinder and harness assembly but breathing through a low-resistance breathing valve (PACK). Compared to CON, VO(2)max was reduced to a similar extent in the SCBA and REG trials (14.9% and 13.1%, respectively). The PACK condition also reduced VO(2)max, but to a lesser extent (4.8 +/- 5.3%). At VO(2)max, VE was decreased and expiratory mouth pressure and external breathing resistance (BR) were increased in both the SCBA and REG trials. There was a significant correlation between the change in maximal V(E)and VO(2)max with the SCBA. The results show that the SCBA reduces VO(2)max by limiting V(E) secondary to the increased BR of the SCBA regulator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"507-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1139/h05-137\",\"citationCount\":\"56\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/h05-137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of applied physiology = Revue canadienne de physiologie appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/h05-137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 56

摘要

我们之前的研究表明,在运动时使用自给式呼吸器(SCBA)呼吸低密度气体可以提高最大通气量(V(E))和最大耗氧量(VO(2)max)。这表明SCBA通过增加呼吸阻力负荷来限制运动。在这项研究中,我们比较了含有和不含SCBA的各种成分的VO(2)max,以确定它们对VO(2)max的影响。12名男性在跑步机上进行了4项随机顺序的增量运动测试,直到精疲力竭:(1)仅使用低阻力呼吸阀(CON);(2)全SCBA (SCBA);(3)仅SCBA调节器(REG);(4)携带钢瓶和线束组件,但通过低阻力呼吸阀(PACK)呼吸。与CON相比,在SCBA和REG试验中,VO(2)max的降低程度相似(分别为14.9%和13.1%)。PACK条件也降低了VO(2)max,但程度较小(4.8 +/- 5.3%)。在最大VO(2)时,SCBA和REG试验的VE降低,呼气口压和外呼吸阻力(BR)升高。最大V(E)和VO(2)max的变化与SCBA有显著的相关性。结果表明,SCBA通过限制由SCBA调节器增加的BR引起的V(E)来降低VO(2)max。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) on ventilatory function and maximal exercise.
Our previous work showed that breathing low density gases during exercise with the self-contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) improves maximal ventilation (V(E)) and maximal oxygen consumption (VO(2)max). This suggests that the SCBA limits exercise by adding a resistive load to breathing. In this study we compared VO(2)max with and without the various components comprising the SCBA to determine their impact on VO(2)max. Twelve males performed 4 randomly ordered incremental exercise tests to exhaustion on a treadmill: (1) low-resistance breathing valve only (CON); (2) full SCBA (SCBA); (3) SCBA regulator only (REG); and (4) carrying the cylinder and harness assembly but breathing through a low-resistance breathing valve (PACK). Compared to CON, VO(2)max was reduced to a similar extent in the SCBA and REG trials (14.9% and 13.1%, respectively). The PACK condition also reduced VO(2)max, but to a lesser extent (4.8 +/- 5.3%). At VO(2)max, VE was decreased and expiratory mouth pressure and external breathing resistance (BR) were increased in both the SCBA and REG trials. There was a significant correlation between the change in maximal V(E)and VO(2)max with the SCBA. The results show that the SCBA reduces VO(2)max by limiting V(E) secondary to the increased BR of the SCBA regulator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信