{"title":"临床医生对计算机引导种植手术方法的态度:沙特阿拉伯的调查。","authors":"Linah M Ashy","doi":"10.2147/POR.S243623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the attitude of clinicians in Saudi Arabia towards dental implant treatment using different implant surgery approaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study was conducted using a web-based questionnaire wherein 56 clinicians ranked their attitude toward computer-guided implant surgery (CGIS) and conventional non-computer-guided surgery (non-CGIS) in terms of advantages, disadvantages and clinical indications. Statistical analysis was conducted by the Spearman correlation test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, at a significance level of <i>P</i><0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey results indicated that the most significant advantages of CGIS from the participants' perspective were low levels of stress during surgery (<i>P</i> = 0.003) and minimal requirement of surgical skills (<i>P</i> = 0.04). Notably, the advantages of accurate outcome and predictable flapless surgery were not considered significantly higher for CGIS than for non-CGIS (<i>P</i> = 0.2 and 0.7, respectively). The high treatment cost was the most significant disadvantage of CGIS when compared to non-CGIS (<i>P</i> = 0.002), and complete edentulism was the most recommended clinical condition for CGIS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinicians acknowledged the advantages of CGIS over non-CGIS, especially in complete edentulism. The significant advantages of CGIS were the clinician's state of low stress and minimal skills required rather than the patient's interest in treatment predictability. CGIS is an attractive approach for most participants, in spite of the low rate of actual use.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/ba/por-12-1.PMC8021253.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicians' Attitude Toward Computer-Guided Implant Surgery Approach: Survey in Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Linah M Ashy\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/POR.S243623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the attitude of clinicians in Saudi Arabia towards dental implant treatment using different implant surgery approaches.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study was conducted using a web-based questionnaire wherein 56 clinicians ranked their attitude toward computer-guided implant surgery (CGIS) and conventional non-computer-guided surgery (non-CGIS) in terms of advantages, disadvantages and clinical indications. Statistical analysis was conducted by the Spearman correlation test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, at a significance level of <i>P</i><0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey results indicated that the most significant advantages of CGIS from the participants' perspective were low levels of stress during surgery (<i>P</i> = 0.003) and minimal requirement of surgical skills (<i>P</i> = 0.04). Notably, the advantages of accurate outcome and predictable flapless surgery were not considered significantly higher for CGIS than for non-CGIS (<i>P</i> = 0.2 and 0.7, respectively). The high treatment cost was the most significant disadvantage of CGIS when compared to non-CGIS (<i>P</i> = 0.002), and complete edentulism was the most recommended clinical condition for CGIS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinicians acknowledged the advantages of CGIS over non-CGIS, especially in complete edentulism. The significant advantages of CGIS were the clinician's state of low stress and minimal skills required rather than the patient's interest in treatment predictability. CGIS is an attractive approach for most participants, in spite of the low rate of actual use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/ba/por-12-1.PMC8021253.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S243623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S243623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinicians' Attitude Toward Computer-Guided Implant Surgery Approach: Survey in Saudi Arabia.
Purpose: To investigate the attitude of clinicians in Saudi Arabia towards dental implant treatment using different implant surgery approaches.
Materials and methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted using a web-based questionnaire wherein 56 clinicians ranked their attitude toward computer-guided implant surgery (CGIS) and conventional non-computer-guided surgery (non-CGIS) in terms of advantages, disadvantages and clinical indications. Statistical analysis was conducted by the Spearman correlation test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests, at a significance level of P<0.05.
Results: The survey results indicated that the most significant advantages of CGIS from the participants' perspective were low levels of stress during surgery (P = 0.003) and minimal requirement of surgical skills (P = 0.04). Notably, the advantages of accurate outcome and predictable flapless surgery were not considered significantly higher for CGIS than for non-CGIS (P = 0.2 and 0.7, respectively). The high treatment cost was the most significant disadvantage of CGIS when compared to non-CGIS (P = 0.002), and complete edentulism was the most recommended clinical condition for CGIS.
Conclusion: Clinicians acknowledged the advantages of CGIS over non-CGIS, especially in complete edentulism. The significant advantages of CGIS were the clinician's state of low stress and minimal skills required rather than the patient's interest in treatment predictability. CGIS is an attractive approach for most participants, in spite of the low rate of actual use.
期刊介绍:
Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.