Zhixin Wang, Sarah Dilley, HyounKyoung G Park, Alfred A Bartolucci, Chenguang Wang, Warner K Huh, Sejong Bae
{"title":"美国卵巢癌的地区差异。","authors":"Zhixin Wang, Sarah Dilley, HyounKyoung G Park, Alfred A Bartolucci, Chenguang Wang, Warner K Huh, Sejong Bae","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the association between geographic regions and ovarian cancer disparities in the United States. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program was used to identify women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. 18 registries were divided into two groups: South region and US14 region. Chi-Square tests were used to compare proportions, the logistic regression model to evaluate the association between 5-year survival and other variables, and the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate hazard ratios. The South region had a lower incidence rate than the US14 region (12.0 vs. 13.4 per 100,000), and a lower 5-year observed survival rate (37.5% vs. 39.8%). White women living in the US14 region had the best overall survival, compared to white women living in the South region, and black women living in both regions. Women in the South region were less likely to have insurance (6.6% vs. 2.7%, p<0.0001) and surgery (73.4% vs. 76.2%, p<0.0001). Women living in the South were 1.4 times more likely to die after five years of diagnosis than women living in the US14 region. The data confirmed regional disparities in ovarian cancer in the United States, showing women living in the South region were disadvantaged in ovarian cancer survival regardless of race, black or white. Future research focusing on the identification of contributing factors to regional disparity in ovarian cancer is necessary to develop practical approaches to improve health outcomes related to this lethal disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":72512,"journal":{"name":"Cancer health disparities","volume":"3 ","pages":"e1-e12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034285/pdf/nihms-1034640.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional Disparities in Ovarian Cancer in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Zhixin Wang, Sarah Dilley, HyounKyoung G Park, Alfred A Bartolucci, Chenguang Wang, Warner K Huh, Sejong Bae\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the association between geographic regions and ovarian cancer disparities in the United States. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program was used to identify women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. 18 registries were divided into two groups: South region and US14 region. Chi-Square tests were used to compare proportions, the logistic regression model to evaluate the association between 5-year survival and other variables, and the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate hazard ratios. The South region had a lower incidence rate than the US14 region (12.0 vs. 13.4 per 100,000), and a lower 5-year observed survival rate (37.5% vs. 39.8%). White women living in the US14 region had the best overall survival, compared to white women living in the South region, and black women living in both regions. Women in the South region were less likely to have insurance (6.6% vs. 2.7%, p<0.0001) and surgery (73.4% vs. 76.2%, p<0.0001). Women living in the South were 1.4 times more likely to die after five years of diagnosis than women living in the US14 region. The data confirmed regional disparities in ovarian cancer in the United States, showing women living in the South region were disadvantaged in ovarian cancer survival regardless of race, black or white. Future research focusing on the identification of contributing factors to regional disparity in ovarian cancer is necessary to develop practical approaches to improve health outcomes related to this lethal disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer health disparities\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"e1-e12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8034285/pdf/nihms-1034640.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer health disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/8/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer health disparities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/8/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项研究的目的是调查美国地理区域和卵巢癌发病率差异之间的关系。来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)项目的数据用于确定诊断为卵巢癌的妇女。18个注册中心分为两组:南部地区和美国地区。采用卡方检验比较比例,采用logistic回归模型评价5年生存率与其他变量的相关性,采用Cox比例风险模型估计风险比。南方地区的发病率低于美国14地区(12.0比13.4 / 100000),5年观察生存率也较低(37.5%比39.8%)。与生活在南部地区的白人妇女和生活在这两个地区的黑人妇女相比,生活在美国14地区的白人妇女的总体存活率最高。南方地区的女性投保的可能性较低(6.6% vs. 2.7%, p
Regional Disparities in Ovarian Cancer in the United States.
The aim of this study was to investigate the association between geographic regions and ovarian cancer disparities in the United States. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program was used to identify women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. 18 registries were divided into two groups: South region and US14 region. Chi-Square tests were used to compare proportions, the logistic regression model to evaluate the association between 5-year survival and other variables, and the Cox proportional hazards model to estimate hazard ratios. The South region had a lower incidence rate than the US14 region (12.0 vs. 13.4 per 100,000), and a lower 5-year observed survival rate (37.5% vs. 39.8%). White women living in the US14 region had the best overall survival, compared to white women living in the South region, and black women living in both regions. Women in the South region were less likely to have insurance (6.6% vs. 2.7%, p<0.0001) and surgery (73.4% vs. 76.2%, p<0.0001). Women living in the South were 1.4 times more likely to die after five years of diagnosis than women living in the US14 region. The data confirmed regional disparities in ovarian cancer in the United States, showing women living in the South region were disadvantaged in ovarian cancer survival regardless of race, black or white. Future research focusing on the identification of contributing factors to regional disparity in ovarian cancer is necessary to develop practical approaches to improve health outcomes related to this lethal disease.