粪便微生物群移植:用途、问题和伦理

Q2 Medicine
Zoya Grigoryan , Michael J. Shen , Shaina W. Twardus , Marc M. Beuttler , Lea Ann Chen , Alison Bateman-House
{"title":"粪便微生物群移植:用途、问题和伦理","authors":"Zoya Grigoryan ,&nbsp;Michael J. Shen ,&nbsp;Shaina W. Twardus ,&nbsp;Marc M. Beuttler ,&nbsp;Lea Ann Chen ,&nbsp;Alison Bateman-House","doi":"10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory <em>C. difficile</em> infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under “enforcement discretion” for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for “do-it-yourself” (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community's research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI—studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising—little is still known about the treatment's mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36019,"journal":{"name":"Medicine in Microecology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100027"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics\",\"authors\":\"Zoya Grigoryan ,&nbsp;Michael J. Shen ,&nbsp;Shaina W. Twardus ,&nbsp;Marc M. Beuttler ,&nbsp;Lea Ann Chen ,&nbsp;Alison Bateman-House\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory <em>C. difficile</em> infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under “enforcement discretion” for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for “do-it-yourself” (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community's research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI—studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising—little is still known about the treatment's mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine in Microecology\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.medmic.2020.100027\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine in Microecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590097820300240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine in Microecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590097820300240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

粪便微生物群移植(FMT)作为一种治疗复发性和难治性艰难梭菌感染(CDI)以及无数其他适应症的方法,在世界范围内迅速臭名昭著和普及,有不同程度的证据证明其使用是合理的。目前,FMT在美国的使用尚未获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)的上市许可,但在CDI对标准治疗无反应的“强制裁量权”下是允许的。与此同时,主流媒体对肠道微生物组的兴趣日益浓厚,为“自己动手”(DIY)适应该程序铺平了道路。这种获取和不受管制的使用,往往在任何临床监督之外,已经迅速超过了医学界的研究和监管努力。虽然一些研究已经能够证明FMT在治疗cdi以外的疾病方面取得了成功-溃疡性结肠炎的研究尤其有希望-但对于治疗的作用机制或长期副作用仍然知之甚少。同样,供体粪便的筛查在方案标准化方面处于早期阶段。在本文中,我们探讨了监管和伦理问题,这些问题是由于需要平衡获得一种新兴但有前途的创新治疗与研究其疗效、风险状况和长期影响的需要而产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fecal microbiota transplantation: Uses, questions, and ethics

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has rapidly grown in notoriety and popularity worldwide as a treatment for both recurrent and refractory C. difficile infection (CDI), as well as for a myriad of other indications, with varying levels of evidence to justify its use. At present, FMT use in the U.S. has not received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but is permitted under “enforcement discretion” for CDI not responding to standard therapy. Meanwhile, the rising interest in the gut microbiome throughout mainstream media has paved the way for “do-it-yourself” (DIY) adaptations of the procedure. This access and unregulated use, often outside any clinical supervision, has quickly outpaced the medical community's research and regulatory efforts. While some studies have been able to demonstrate the success of FMT in treating conditions other than CDI—studies on ulcerative colitis have been particularly promising—little is still known about the treatment's mechanism of action or long-term side effects. Likewise, screening of donor stool is in its early stages in terms of protocol standardization. In this paper, we explore the regulatory and ethical concerns that arise from the need to balance access to a nascent but promising innovative treatment with the need for research into its efficacy, risk profile, and long-term impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine in Microecology
Medicine in Microecology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
76 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信