固定路线公共汽车载客负担的探索性研究。

Lidia Kostyniuk, Clive D'Souza
{"title":"固定路线公共汽车载客负担的探索性研究。","authors":"Lidia Kostyniuk,&nbsp;Clive D'Souza","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the presence of disabled passengers on fixed-route transit affects operations, their data are often ignored, aggregated into a broad \"encumbered\" category, or marked as outliers in analyses of service performance measures. This study examines boarding and alighting characteristics of passengers encumbered with mobility aids (wheelchairs, scooters, walkers, and canes) and accessories (bicycles, strollers, and trailers) on fixed route buses and compares them to ambulatory unencumbered passengers. Data from detailed task analysis of video recordings of boarding and alighting activity at 1,327 bus stops from a sample of 29 bus trips on two fixed routes in Ann Arbor were analyzed. Results indicate that encumbered passengers did not travel in the morning peak period, but with the exception of wheelchair users, did not avoid the p.m. peak period. Almost all passengers with mobility aids, about half of those with accessories, and about a third of ambulatory passengers exited through front doors. The overall average dwell time was 19 seconds and 15 seconds when no encumbered individuals were boarding and alighting, respectively. Average dwell times ranged from 28 to 137 seconds when encumbered individuals were among those getting on or off. Examination of dwell times by specific mobility aid and accessory suggest that grouping passengers into: ambulatory with no accessories, encumbered with no ramp needed, and ramp needed might be a simple practical approach to including the effects of the broad diversity of transit passengers, both with and without disabilities into dwell time analyses, and in turn into measures of transit operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":87375,"journal":{"name":"TRB ... annual meeting final program. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. Annual Meeting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985969/pdf/nihms-1562479.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Exploratory Study of Encumbered Passengers on Fixed Route Buses.\",\"authors\":\"Lidia Kostyniuk,&nbsp;Clive D'Souza\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although the presence of disabled passengers on fixed-route transit affects operations, their data are often ignored, aggregated into a broad \\\"encumbered\\\" category, or marked as outliers in analyses of service performance measures. This study examines boarding and alighting characteristics of passengers encumbered with mobility aids (wheelchairs, scooters, walkers, and canes) and accessories (bicycles, strollers, and trailers) on fixed route buses and compares them to ambulatory unencumbered passengers. Data from detailed task analysis of video recordings of boarding and alighting activity at 1,327 bus stops from a sample of 29 bus trips on two fixed routes in Ann Arbor were analyzed. Results indicate that encumbered passengers did not travel in the morning peak period, but with the exception of wheelchair users, did not avoid the p.m. peak period. Almost all passengers with mobility aids, about half of those with accessories, and about a third of ambulatory passengers exited through front doors. The overall average dwell time was 19 seconds and 15 seconds when no encumbered individuals were boarding and alighting, respectively. Average dwell times ranged from 28 to 137 seconds when encumbered individuals were among those getting on or off. Examination of dwell times by specific mobility aid and accessory suggest that grouping passengers into: ambulatory with no accessories, encumbered with no ramp needed, and ramp needed might be a simple practical approach to including the effects of the broad diversity of transit passengers, both with and without disabilities into dwell time analyses, and in turn into measures of transit operations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TRB ... annual meeting final program. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. Annual Meeting\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7985969/pdf/nihms-1562479.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TRB ... annual meeting final program. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. Annual Meeting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TRB ... annual meeting final program. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.). Transportation Research Board. Annual Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然固定路线运输中残疾乘客的存在影响了运营,但他们的数据往往被忽视,汇总成一个广泛的“阻碍”类别,或在服务绩效措施分析中被标记为异常值。本研究调查了在固定路线公交车上携带辅助工具(轮椅、踏板车、助行器和手杖)和辅助工具(自行车、婴儿车和拖车)的乘客的上下车特征,并将他们与不携带辅助工具的流动乘客进行了比较。数据来自详细的任务分析,从安娜堡的两条固定路线上的29次公交旅行中,分析了1,327个公交站点上车和下车活动的视频记录。结果表明,除轮椅使用者外,有障碍的旅客没有在早高峰时段出行,但没有避开晚高峰时段。几乎所有携带行动辅助设备的乘客,大约一半携带辅助设备的乘客,以及大约三分之一的不能走动的乘客从前门离开。总体平均停留时间分别为19秒和15秒,当没有乘客登机和下飞机时。当有障碍的人上下车时,平均停留时间从28秒到137秒不等。通过特定的移动辅助设备和辅助设备对停留时间的检查表明,将乘客分为:没有辅助设备的流动乘客、不需要坡道的障碍乘客和需要坡道的乘客,可能是一种简单实用的方法,可以将过境乘客(无论有无残疾)的广泛多样性的影响纳入停留时间分析,进而纳入过境运营措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Exploratory Study of Encumbered Passengers on Fixed Route Buses.

Although the presence of disabled passengers on fixed-route transit affects operations, their data are often ignored, aggregated into a broad "encumbered" category, or marked as outliers in analyses of service performance measures. This study examines boarding and alighting characteristics of passengers encumbered with mobility aids (wheelchairs, scooters, walkers, and canes) and accessories (bicycles, strollers, and trailers) on fixed route buses and compares them to ambulatory unencumbered passengers. Data from detailed task analysis of video recordings of boarding and alighting activity at 1,327 bus stops from a sample of 29 bus trips on two fixed routes in Ann Arbor were analyzed. Results indicate that encumbered passengers did not travel in the morning peak period, but with the exception of wheelchair users, did not avoid the p.m. peak period. Almost all passengers with mobility aids, about half of those with accessories, and about a third of ambulatory passengers exited through front doors. The overall average dwell time was 19 seconds and 15 seconds when no encumbered individuals were boarding and alighting, respectively. Average dwell times ranged from 28 to 137 seconds when encumbered individuals were among those getting on or off. Examination of dwell times by specific mobility aid and accessory suggest that grouping passengers into: ambulatory with no accessories, encumbered with no ramp needed, and ramp needed might be a simple practical approach to including the effects of the broad diversity of transit passengers, both with and without disabilities into dwell time analyses, and in turn into measures of transit operations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信