利用改进Brier评分和分层聚类研究年龄相关的元记忆差异。

Open psychology Pub Date : 2019-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-06-29 DOI:10.1515/psych-2018-0015
Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti, Grace C Lin, Masha R Jones, Erik Linstead, Susanne M Jaeggi
{"title":"利用改进Brier评分和分层聚类研究年龄相关的元记忆差异。","authors":"Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti,&nbsp;Grace C Lin,&nbsp;Masha R Jones,&nbsp;Erik Linstead,&nbsp;Susanne M Jaeggi","doi":"10.1515/psych-2018-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Older adults (OAs) typically experience memory failures as they age. However, with some exceptions, studies of OAs' ability to assess their own memory functions-Metamemory (MM) - find little evidence that this function is susceptible to age-related decline. Our study examines OAs' and young adults' (YAs) MM performance and strategy use. Groups of YAs (N = 138) and OAs (N = 79) performed a MM task that required participants to place bets on how likely they were to remember words in a list. Our analytical approach includes hierarchical clustering, and we introduce a new measure of MM-the modified Brier-in order to adjust for differences in scale usage between participants. Our data indicate that OAs and YAs differ in the strategies they use to assess their memory and in how well their MM matches with memory performance. However, there was no evidence that the chosen strategies were associated with differences in MM match, indicating that there are multiple strategies that might be effective (i.e. lead to similar match) in this MM task.</p>","PeriodicalId":74357,"journal":{"name":"Open psychology","volume":" ","pages":"215-238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/psych-2018-0015","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical Clustering.\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti,&nbsp;Grace C Lin,&nbsp;Masha R Jones,&nbsp;Erik Linstead,&nbsp;Susanne M Jaeggi\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/psych-2018-0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Older adults (OAs) typically experience memory failures as they age. However, with some exceptions, studies of OAs' ability to assess their own memory functions-Metamemory (MM) - find little evidence that this function is susceptible to age-related decline. Our study examines OAs' and young adults' (YAs) MM performance and strategy use. Groups of YAs (N = 138) and OAs (N = 79) performed a MM task that required participants to place bets on how likely they were to remember words in a list. Our analytical approach includes hierarchical clustering, and we introduce a new measure of MM-the modified Brier-in order to adjust for differences in scale usage between participants. Our data indicate that OAs and YAs differ in the strategies they use to assess their memory and in how well their MM matches with memory performance. However, there was no evidence that the chosen strategies were associated with differences in MM match, indicating that there are multiple strategies that might be effective (i.e. lead to similar match) in this MM task.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"215-238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/psych-2018-0015\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/psych-2018-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

随着年龄的增长,老年人通常会经历记忆力减退。然而,除了一些例外,对oa评估自身记忆功能——元记忆(MM)能力的研究发现,几乎没有证据表明这种功能容易受到年龄相关衰退的影响。我们的研究考察了oa和年轻人的MM绩效和策略使用。一组yes (N = 138)和oa (N = 79)执行了一项MM任务,要求参与者对他们记住列表中单词的可能性进行下注。我们的分析方法包括层次聚类,我们引入了一个新的测量mm -修正brier,以调整参与者之间的量表使用差异。我们的数据表明,oa和ya使用不同的策略来评估他们的记忆,以及他们的MM与记忆性能的匹配程度。然而,没有证据表明所选择的策略与MM匹配的差异有关,这表明在这个MM任务中有多种策略可能是有效的(即导致相似的匹配)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical Clustering.

Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical Clustering.

Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical Clustering.

Exploring Age-Related Metamemory Differences using Modified Brier Scores and Hierarchical Clustering.

Older adults (OAs) typically experience memory failures as they age. However, with some exceptions, studies of OAs' ability to assess their own memory functions-Metamemory (MM) - find little evidence that this function is susceptible to age-related decline. Our study examines OAs' and young adults' (YAs) MM performance and strategy use. Groups of YAs (N = 138) and OAs (N = 79) performed a MM task that required participants to place bets on how likely they were to remember words in a list. Our analytical approach includes hierarchical clustering, and we introduce a new measure of MM-the modified Brier-in order to adjust for differences in scale usage between participants. Our data indicate that OAs and YAs differ in the strategies they use to assess their memory and in how well their MM matches with memory performance. However, there was no evidence that the chosen strategies were associated with differences in MM match, indicating that there are multiple strategies that might be effective (i.e. lead to similar match) in this MM task.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信