脊髓损伤后疼痛的文献计量学研究。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Neural Plasticity Pub Date : 2021-02-19 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/6634644
Yi-Zu Wang, Cheng-Cheng Wu, Xue-Qiang Wang
{"title":"脊髓损伤后疼痛的文献计量学研究。","authors":"Yi-Zu Wang,&nbsp;Cheng-Cheng Wu,&nbsp;Xue-Qiang Wang","doi":"10.1155/2021/6634644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of comorbid pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) is relatively high in clinical observations and has continued to increase over time. Neuropathic pain (70.14%) is the most popular subject in academic journals after SCI. However, studies that used the bibliometric method to analyze comorbid pain after SCI are still lacking. This study is aimed at combining and integrating acquired information to analyze the global trends of research on the comorbidity of pain after SCI in the last three decades (1990-2019).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic works of literature published from 1990 to 2019 were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection. CiteSpace software was used to analyze the relationship of publication year with the country, institution, journals, authors, references, and keywords. The regression analysis is used to evaluate the percentage of the category increase or decrease over time significantly. IBM SPSS Statistics was used in the statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 730 publications were included in the analysis. A remarkable increase in the number of publications was observed in the study period (<i>P</i> < 0.05). A total of 202 academic journals focused on the categories of clinical neurology, neurosciences, and rehabilitation, and the annual growth rate of articles in these three categories was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The USA (356, 48.77%) and the University of Miami (64, 8.77%) were the country and institution with the highest number of publications, respectively. <i>Spinal Cord</i>, which was the main journal for research on pain after SCI, had the most publications (88, 12.05%). Burst keywords showed that the individual, inflammation, and central sensitization with pain after SCI are the research development trends and focus in this research field.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, this study provides the latest research direction for pain after SCI. This historical overview of research into pain after SCI will be a useful basis for further research into development trends, focus issues, cooperators, and cooperative institutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":19122,"journal":{"name":"Neural Plasticity","volume":"2021 ","pages":"6634644"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914384/pdf/","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bibliometric Study of Pain after Spinal Cord Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Zu Wang,&nbsp;Cheng-Cheng Wu,&nbsp;Xue-Qiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/6634644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of comorbid pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) is relatively high in clinical observations and has continued to increase over time. Neuropathic pain (70.14%) is the most popular subject in academic journals after SCI. However, studies that used the bibliometric method to analyze comorbid pain after SCI are still lacking. This study is aimed at combining and integrating acquired information to analyze the global trends of research on the comorbidity of pain after SCI in the last three decades (1990-2019).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic works of literature published from 1990 to 2019 were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection. CiteSpace software was used to analyze the relationship of publication year with the country, institution, journals, authors, references, and keywords. The regression analysis is used to evaluate the percentage of the category increase or decrease over time significantly. IBM SPSS Statistics was used in the statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 730 publications were included in the analysis. A remarkable increase in the number of publications was observed in the study period (<i>P</i> < 0.05). A total of 202 academic journals focused on the categories of clinical neurology, neurosciences, and rehabilitation, and the annual growth rate of articles in these three categories was statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The USA (356, 48.77%) and the University of Miami (64, 8.77%) were the country and institution with the highest number of publications, respectively. <i>Spinal Cord</i>, which was the main journal for research on pain after SCI, had the most publications (88, 12.05%). Burst keywords showed that the individual, inflammation, and central sensitization with pain after SCI are the research development trends and focus in this research field.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, this study provides the latest research direction for pain after SCI. This historical overview of research into pain after SCI will be a useful basis for further research into development trends, focus issues, cooperators, and cooperative institutions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neural Plasticity\",\"volume\":\"2021 \",\"pages\":\"6634644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7914384/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neural Plasticity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6634644\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neural Plasticity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6634644","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

背景:在临床观察中,脊髓损伤(SCI)后共病性疼痛的患病率相对较高,并且随着时间的推移持续增加。神经性疼痛(70.14%)是SCI之后学术期刊最热门的主题。然而,使用文献计量学方法分析脊髓损伤后共病疼痛的研究仍然缺乏。本研究旨在结合和整合已获得的信息,分析近三十年(1990-2019)全球脊髓损伤后疼痛合并症的研究趋势。方法:系统检索Web of Science核心馆藏1990 - 2019年发表的文献。采用CiteSpace软件分析出版年份与国家、机构、期刊、作者、参考文献、关键词的关系。回归分析用于评估类别随时间显著增加或减少的百分比。采用IBM SPSS Statistics进行统计分析。结果:共纳入730篇文献。研究期间论文发表数量显著增加(P < 0.05)。临床神经病学、神经科学、康复类共计202种学术期刊,这3个类别的文章年增长率均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。美国(356篇,48.77%)和迈阿密大学(64篇,8.77%)分别是发表论文数量最多的国家和机构。脊髓是研究脊髓损伤后疼痛的主要期刊,发表论文最多(88篇,12.05%)。突发关键词显示,个体、炎症、中枢致敏与脊髓损伤后疼痛是该研究领域的研究发展趋势和重点。结论:总的来说,本研究为脊髓损伤后疼痛提供了最新的研究方向。对脊髓损伤后疼痛研究的历史回顾将为进一步研究发展趋势、焦点问题、合作者和合作机构提供有益的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bibliometric Study of Pain after Spinal Cord Injury.

Bibliometric Study of Pain after Spinal Cord Injury.

Bibliometric Study of Pain after Spinal Cord Injury.

Bibliometric Study of Pain after Spinal Cord Injury.

Background: The prevalence of comorbid pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) is relatively high in clinical observations and has continued to increase over time. Neuropathic pain (70.14%) is the most popular subject in academic journals after SCI. However, studies that used the bibliometric method to analyze comorbid pain after SCI are still lacking. This study is aimed at combining and integrating acquired information to analyze the global trends of research on the comorbidity of pain after SCI in the last three decades (1990-2019).

Methods: Systematic works of literature published from 1990 to 2019 were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection. CiteSpace software was used to analyze the relationship of publication year with the country, institution, journals, authors, references, and keywords. The regression analysis is used to evaluate the percentage of the category increase or decrease over time significantly. IBM SPSS Statistics was used in the statistical analysis.

Results: A total of 730 publications were included in the analysis. A remarkable increase in the number of publications was observed in the study period (P < 0.05). A total of 202 academic journals focused on the categories of clinical neurology, neurosciences, and rehabilitation, and the annual growth rate of articles in these three categories was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The USA (356, 48.77%) and the University of Miami (64, 8.77%) were the country and institution with the highest number of publications, respectively. Spinal Cord, which was the main journal for research on pain after SCI, had the most publications (88, 12.05%). Burst keywords showed that the individual, inflammation, and central sensitization with pain after SCI are the research development trends and focus in this research field.

Conclusions: Overall, this study provides the latest research direction for pain after SCI. This historical overview of research into pain after SCI will be a useful basis for further research into development trends, focus issues, cooperators, and cooperative institutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neural Plasticity
Neural Plasticity Neuroscience-Neurology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Neural Plasticity is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles related to all aspects of neural plasticity, with special emphasis on its functional significance as reflected in behavior and in psychopathology. Neural Plasticity publishes research and review articles from the entire range of relevant disciplines, including basic neuroscience, behavioral neuroscience, cognitive neuroscience, biological psychology, and biological psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信