Norwich髌骨不稳定评分和Banff髌骨不稳定仪在髌骨不稳定术后患者中的荷兰语翻译和验证。

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Acta orthopaedica Belgica Pub Date : 2020-09-01
Jordy Dp Van Sambeeck, Sebastiaan Aw Van de Groes, Sander Koëter
{"title":"Norwich髌骨不稳定评分和Banff髌骨不稳定仪在髌骨不稳定术后患者中的荷兰语翻译和验证。","authors":"Jordy Dp Van Sambeeck,&nbsp;Sebastiaan Aw Van de Groes,&nbsp;Sander Koëter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recently, two new English specific patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate treatment of patients with patellofemoral complaints have been developed : the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) and the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score. This study was designed to translate and validate the BPII and NPI in Dutch patients after surgical treatment for patellar instability. Forward and backward translation of the outcome measures was performed. Patients who had been surgically treated for patellar instability filled out the NPI and BPII together with the Kujala Knee Score, numeric rating scales, Knee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and SF- 36. We assessed internal consistency and construct validity. We evaluated the presence of ceiling and floor effects. Ninety-seven patients completed the online questionnaires. The internal consistency of the NPI and BPII score was excellent for both outcome measures. The BPII and NPI had good correlations with other PROMs. For the BPII we found no floor nor ceiling effect. For the NPI we found a floor effect but no ceiling effect. Our results indicate that the Dutch version of the BPII and the NPI can be used for patients with patellar instability. Both PROMs have specific (dis) advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":7018,"journal":{"name":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","volume":"86 3","pages":"470-481"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dutch translation and validation of the Norwich Patellar Instability score and Banff Patella Instability Instrument in patients after surgery for patellar instability.\",\"authors\":\"Jordy Dp Van Sambeeck,&nbsp;Sebastiaan Aw Van de Groes,&nbsp;Sander Koëter\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Recently, two new English specific patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate treatment of patients with patellofemoral complaints have been developed : the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) and the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score. This study was designed to translate and validate the BPII and NPI in Dutch patients after surgical treatment for patellar instability. Forward and backward translation of the outcome measures was performed. Patients who had been surgically treated for patellar instability filled out the NPI and BPII together with the Kujala Knee Score, numeric rating scales, Knee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and SF- 36. We assessed internal consistency and construct validity. We evaluated the presence of ceiling and floor effects. Ninety-seven patients completed the online questionnaires. The internal consistency of the NPI and BPII score was excellent for both outcome measures. The BPII and NPI had good correlations with other PROMs. For the BPII we found no floor nor ceiling effect. For the NPI we found a floor effect but no ceiling effect. Our results indicate that the Dutch version of the BPII and the NPI can be used for patients with patellar instability. Both PROMs have specific (dis) advantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"86 3\",\"pages\":\"470-481\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta orthopaedica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta orthopaedica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,两种新的英国特定患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)被开发出来,用于评估髌骨疾患患者的治疗:Banff髌骨不稳定仪(BPII)和Norwich髌骨不稳定(NPI)评分。本研究旨在翻译和验证荷兰患者髌骨不稳手术治疗后的BPII和NPI。对结果测量进行前向和后向翻译。手术治疗髌骨不稳的患者填写了NPI和BPII以及Kujala膝关节评分、数值评定量表、膝关节残疾和骨关节炎结局评分(oos)和SF- 36。我们评估了内部一致性和结构效度。我们评估了天花板和地板效应的存在。97名患者完成了在线问卷调查。NPI和BPII评分的内部一致性在两种结果测量中都很好。BPII和NPI与其他PROMs具有良好的相关性。对于BPII,我们没有发现下限和上限效应。对于NPI,我们发现了一个下限效应,但没有上限效应。我们的研究结果表明,荷兰版的BPII和NPI可用于髌骨不稳患者。两种prom都有特定的(缺点)优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dutch translation and validation of the Norwich Patellar Instability score and Banff Patella Instability Instrument in patients after surgery for patellar instability.

Recently, two new English specific patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate treatment of patients with patellofemoral complaints have been developed : the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) and the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score. This study was designed to translate and validate the BPII and NPI in Dutch patients after surgical treatment for patellar instability. Forward and backward translation of the outcome measures was performed. Patients who had been surgically treated for patellar instability filled out the NPI and BPII together with the Kujala Knee Score, numeric rating scales, Knee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and SF- 36. We assessed internal consistency and construct validity. We evaluated the presence of ceiling and floor effects. Ninety-seven patients completed the online questionnaires. The internal consistency of the NPI and BPII score was excellent for both outcome measures. The BPII and NPI had good correlations with other PROMs. For the BPII we found no floor nor ceiling effect. For the NPI we found a floor effect but no ceiling effect. Our results indicate that the Dutch version of the BPII and the NPI can be used for patients with patellar instability. Both PROMs have specific (dis) advantages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta orthopaedica Belgica
Acta orthopaedica Belgica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信