情绪和焦虑障碍症状严重程度和治疗反应的影响动态预测因子:特异性证据。

Q2 Psychology
Journal for Person-Oriented Research Pub Date : 2019-12-30 eCollection Date: 2019-01-01 DOI:10.17505/jpor.2019.09
Hannah G Bosley, Peter D Soyster, Aaron J Fisher
{"title":"情绪和焦虑障碍症状严重程度和治疗反应的影响动态预测因子:特异性证据。","authors":"Hannah G Bosley,&nbsp;Peter D Soyster,&nbsp;Aaron J Fisher","doi":"10.17505/jpor.2019.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies of affect dynamics in psychopathology often focus on the prediction of broad constructs like subjective well-being and psychological health. Less is known about how fluctuation in affect over time relates to specific symptom measures (e.g., anxiety or depression), or how these domains change in treatment. A clinical sample of 32 adults with mood and anxiety disorders (13 generalized anxiety, 5 major depression, 14 comorbid) completed four daily assessments of positive (PA) and negative affect (NA) for 30 days prior to receiving cognitive behavioral treatment. Anxiety and depression symptom severity were assessed pre- and post-treatment. We calculated three metrics of affect dynamics for each person's PA and NA time series: (1) <i>variability</i> (experiencing emotional extremes, the standard deviation of a person's PA or NA vector); (2) <i>instability</i> (magnitude of point-to-point change in emotion, the vector's mean squared successive difference); and (3) <i>inertia</i> (the extent to which emotions self-perpetuate over time, the lag-1 autocorrelation of the vector). Multiple regression models were run to test dynamics of positive and negative affect as between-subjects predictors of symptom severity and pre-to-posttreatment change in symptoms. Findings suggest NA dynamics are unrelated to depression symptom severity or treatment response, but we observed a specific effect of NA instability (MSSD) on both severity and response of anxiety symptoms. All PA dynamics were unrelated to anxiety or depression symptom severity. However, variability, instability, and inertia of PA were all found to relate to treatment response for both anxiety and depression symptoms. Taken together, our results suggest that affect dynamics have some specificity in their relationship to clinically relevant phenomena such as symptom severity and treatment outcomes at the between-subjects level of analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":36744,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Person-Oriented Research","volume":"5 2","pages":"101-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7842610/pdf/","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Affect Dynamics as Predictors of Symptom Severity and Treatment Response in Mood and Anxiety Disorders: Evidence for Specificity.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah G Bosley,&nbsp;Peter D Soyster,&nbsp;Aaron J Fisher\",\"doi\":\"10.17505/jpor.2019.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies of affect dynamics in psychopathology often focus on the prediction of broad constructs like subjective well-being and psychological health. Less is known about how fluctuation in affect over time relates to specific symptom measures (e.g., anxiety or depression), or how these domains change in treatment. A clinical sample of 32 adults with mood and anxiety disorders (13 generalized anxiety, 5 major depression, 14 comorbid) completed four daily assessments of positive (PA) and negative affect (NA) for 30 days prior to receiving cognitive behavioral treatment. Anxiety and depression symptom severity were assessed pre- and post-treatment. We calculated three metrics of affect dynamics for each person's PA and NA time series: (1) <i>variability</i> (experiencing emotional extremes, the standard deviation of a person's PA or NA vector); (2) <i>instability</i> (magnitude of point-to-point change in emotion, the vector's mean squared successive difference); and (3) <i>inertia</i> (the extent to which emotions self-perpetuate over time, the lag-1 autocorrelation of the vector). Multiple regression models were run to test dynamics of positive and negative affect as between-subjects predictors of symptom severity and pre-to-posttreatment change in symptoms. Findings suggest NA dynamics are unrelated to depression symptom severity or treatment response, but we observed a specific effect of NA instability (MSSD) on both severity and response of anxiety symptoms. All PA dynamics were unrelated to anxiety or depression symptom severity. However, variability, instability, and inertia of PA were all found to relate to treatment response for both anxiety and depression symptoms. Taken together, our results suggest that affect dynamics have some specificity in their relationship to clinically relevant phenomena such as symptom severity and treatment outcomes at the between-subjects level of analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Person-Oriented Research\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"101-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7842610/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Person-Oriented Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17505/jpor.2019.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Person-Oriented Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17505/jpor.2019.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

精神病理学中情感动力学的研究通常集中在主观幸福感和心理健康等广义概念的预测上。对于影响随时间的波动如何与特定症状测量(例如,焦虑或抑郁)相关,或者这些域在治疗中如何变化,我们所知较少。在接受认知行为治疗前30天,32名患有情绪和焦虑障碍(13名广泛性焦虑,5名重度抑郁,14名共病)的成人临床样本完成了4次每日积极(PA)和消极影响(NA)评估。评估治疗前后焦虑和抑郁症状的严重程度。我们为每个人的PA和NA时间序列计算了三个情感动态指标:(1)变异性(经历极端情绪,一个人的PA或NA向量的标准差);(2)不稳定性(情绪点对点变化的大小,矢量的均方连续差值);(3)惯性(情绪随时间自我延续的程度,向量的lag-1自相关)。使用多元回归模型来测试积极和消极情绪作为症状严重程度和治疗前后症状变化的受试者之间预测因子的动态。研究结果表明,NA动态与抑郁症状的严重程度或治疗反应无关,但我们观察到NA不稳定性(MSSD)对焦虑症状的严重程度和反应都有特定的影响。所有PA动态与焦虑或抑郁症状严重程度无关。然而,PA的变异性、不稳定性和惰性都与焦虑和抑郁症状的治疗反应有关。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,在受试者之间的分析水平上,情感动力学与临床相关现象(如症状严重程度和治疗结果)的关系具有一定的特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Affect Dynamics as Predictors of Symptom Severity and Treatment Response in Mood and Anxiety Disorders: Evidence for Specificity.

Affect Dynamics as Predictors of Symptom Severity and Treatment Response in Mood and Anxiety Disorders: Evidence for Specificity.

Affect Dynamics as Predictors of Symptom Severity and Treatment Response in Mood and Anxiety Disorders: Evidence for Specificity.

Studies of affect dynamics in psychopathology often focus on the prediction of broad constructs like subjective well-being and psychological health. Less is known about how fluctuation in affect over time relates to specific symptom measures (e.g., anxiety or depression), or how these domains change in treatment. A clinical sample of 32 adults with mood and anxiety disorders (13 generalized anxiety, 5 major depression, 14 comorbid) completed four daily assessments of positive (PA) and negative affect (NA) for 30 days prior to receiving cognitive behavioral treatment. Anxiety and depression symptom severity were assessed pre- and post-treatment. We calculated three metrics of affect dynamics for each person's PA and NA time series: (1) variability (experiencing emotional extremes, the standard deviation of a person's PA or NA vector); (2) instability (magnitude of point-to-point change in emotion, the vector's mean squared successive difference); and (3) inertia (the extent to which emotions self-perpetuate over time, the lag-1 autocorrelation of the vector). Multiple regression models were run to test dynamics of positive and negative affect as between-subjects predictors of symptom severity and pre-to-posttreatment change in symptoms. Findings suggest NA dynamics are unrelated to depression symptom severity or treatment response, but we observed a specific effect of NA instability (MSSD) on both severity and response of anxiety symptoms. All PA dynamics were unrelated to anxiety or depression symptom severity. However, variability, instability, and inertia of PA were all found to relate to treatment response for both anxiety and depression symptoms. Taken together, our results suggest that affect dynamics have some specificity in their relationship to clinically relevant phenomena such as symptom severity and treatment outcomes at the between-subjects level of analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Person-Oriented Research
Journal for Person-Oriented Research Psychology-Psychology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信