不同衬垫对复合材料与初级牙本质结合强度的影响:体外研究。

R Frankenberger, S Nassiri, S Lücker, N N Lygidakis, N Krämer
{"title":"不同衬垫对复合材料与初级牙本质结合强度的影响:体外研究。","authors":"R Frankenberger,&nbsp;S Nassiri,&nbsp;S Lücker,&nbsp;N N Lygidakis,&nbsp;N Krämer","doi":"10.1007/s40368-020-00601-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This in vitro investigation should identify the effect of protective liners on dentine bond strength of a polyacid modified resin composite to dentine of primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two extracted caries-free primary molars were randomly assigned to seven groups (n = 6) and flattened. Six test groups were centrally covered with different protective liners/base materials: Kerr Life (KL), IRM zinc oxide eugenol cement (IRM), Ketac Bond (KB), Vitrebond (VB), Dycal (DY), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Specimens were bonded with Prime&Bond NT (PB) and restored with Dyract eXtra. The control group (C) did not receive liner pretreatment. After 24-h storage in Aqua dest. (37 °C), specimens were cut and regional microtensile bond strengths of the uncovered areas were tested. Fractography was conducted under a light microscope and further interface/surface analyses were performed under a SEM. Statistical appraisal was carried out using oneway ANOVA (mod. LSD test; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Independent of the distance to the applied liner, all groups exhibited inferior μ-TBS to dentine of primary teeth compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The results were as follows in MPa(SD) <sup>x</sup>:significance level/percentage of adhesive fractures: PB: 34 (10)<sup>A</sup>/72%; KL: 23 (25)<sup>B</sup>/64%; KB: 15 (12)<sup>C</sup>/76%; DY 15 (13)<sup>C</sup>/55%; IRM: 14 (10)<sup>C</sup>/68%; VB: 12 (10)<sup>C</sup>/61%; MTA 12 (10)<sup>C</sup>/69%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Protective liners significantly reduced μ-TBS to dentine of primary teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":520615,"journal":{"name":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"643-649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40368-020-00601-2","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of different liners on the bond strength of a compomer to primary teeth dentine: in vitro study.\",\"authors\":\"R Frankenberger,&nbsp;S Nassiri,&nbsp;S Lücker,&nbsp;N N Lygidakis,&nbsp;N Krämer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40368-020-00601-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This in vitro investigation should identify the effect of protective liners on dentine bond strength of a polyacid modified resin composite to dentine of primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two extracted caries-free primary molars were randomly assigned to seven groups (n = 6) and flattened. Six test groups were centrally covered with different protective liners/base materials: Kerr Life (KL), IRM zinc oxide eugenol cement (IRM), Ketac Bond (KB), Vitrebond (VB), Dycal (DY), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Specimens were bonded with Prime&Bond NT (PB) and restored with Dyract eXtra. The control group (C) did not receive liner pretreatment. After 24-h storage in Aqua dest. (37 °C), specimens were cut and regional microtensile bond strengths of the uncovered areas were tested. Fractography was conducted under a light microscope and further interface/surface analyses were performed under a SEM. Statistical appraisal was carried out using oneway ANOVA (mod. LSD test; p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Independent of the distance to the applied liner, all groups exhibited inferior μ-TBS to dentine of primary teeth compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The results were as follows in MPa(SD) <sup>x</sup>:significance level/percentage of adhesive fractures: PB: 34 (10)<sup>A</sup>/72%; KL: 23 (25)<sup>B</sup>/64%; KB: 15 (12)<sup>C</sup>/76%; DY 15 (13)<sup>C</sup>/55%; IRM: 14 (10)<sup>C</sup>/68%; VB: 12 (10)<sup>C</sup>/61%; MTA 12 (10)<sup>C</sup>/69%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Protective liners significantly reduced μ-TBS to dentine of primary teeth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"643-649\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40368-020-00601-2\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00601-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/2/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-020-00601-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:研究保护衬垫对聚酸改性树脂复合材料与乳牙牙本质结合强度的影响。方法:42颗拔除无龋的恒磨牙随机分为7组(n = 6),并将其压平。六个试验组中央覆盖不同的保护衬垫/基础材料:Kerr Life (KL), IRM氧化锌丁香酚水泥(IRM), Ketac Bond (KB), Vitrebond (VB), Dycal (DY)和矿物三氧化物骨料(MTA)。标本用Prime&Bond NT (PB)粘接,用Dyract eXtra修复。对照组(C组)不进行线性预处理。在37°C水溶液中保存24 h后,切割试件,测试未覆盖区域的局部微拉伸粘结强度。在光学显微镜下进行断口分析,在扫描电镜下进行进一步的界面/表面分析。统计学评价采用单因素方差分析(mod. LSD)检验;p结果:与应用衬套的距离无关,所有组对乳牙本质的μ-TBS均低于对照组(p x:显著性水平/粘接剂骨折百分比:PB: 34 (10)A/72%;Kl: 23 (25) b /64%;Kb: 15 (12) c /76%;Dy 15 (13) c /55%;公司:14 (10)c /68%;Vb: 12 (10) c /61%;mta12 (10) c /69%。结论:保护衬垫可显著降低乳牙对牙本质的μ-TBS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of different liners on the bond strength of a compomer to primary teeth dentine: in vitro study.

Objective: This in vitro investigation should identify the effect of protective liners on dentine bond strength of a polyacid modified resin composite to dentine of primary teeth.

Methods: Forty-two extracted caries-free primary molars were randomly assigned to seven groups (n = 6) and flattened. Six test groups were centrally covered with different protective liners/base materials: Kerr Life (KL), IRM zinc oxide eugenol cement (IRM), Ketac Bond (KB), Vitrebond (VB), Dycal (DY), and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA). Specimens were bonded with Prime&Bond NT (PB) and restored with Dyract eXtra. The control group (C) did not receive liner pretreatment. After 24-h storage in Aqua dest. (37 °C), specimens were cut and regional microtensile bond strengths of the uncovered areas were tested. Fractography was conducted under a light microscope and further interface/surface analyses were performed under a SEM. Statistical appraisal was carried out using oneway ANOVA (mod. LSD test; p < 0.05).

Results: Independent of the distance to the applied liner, all groups exhibited inferior μ-TBS to dentine of primary teeth compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The results were as follows in MPa(SD) x:significance level/percentage of adhesive fractures: PB: 34 (10)A/72%; KL: 23 (25)B/64%; KB: 15 (12)C/76%; DY 15 (13)C/55%; IRM: 14 (10)C/68%; VB: 12 (10)C/61%; MTA 12 (10)C/69%.

Conclusions: Protective liners significantly reduced μ-TBS to dentine of primary teeth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信