食物与情绪:补充益生元和益生菌干预治疗成人焦虑和抑郁的综述。

IF 3.3 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Pub Date : 2020-07-06 eCollection Date: 2020-12-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjnph-2019-000053
Sanjay Noonan, Meena Zaveri, Elaine Macaninch, Kathy Martyn
{"title":"食物与情绪:补充益生元和益生菌干预治疗成人焦虑和抑郁的综述。","authors":"Sanjay Noonan,&nbsp;Meena Zaveri,&nbsp;Elaine Macaninch,&nbsp;Kathy Martyn","doi":"10.1136/bmjnph-2019-000053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A bidirectional relationship exists between the brain and the gastrointestinal tract. Foods containing bacteria that positively influence the gastrointestinal microbiome are termed, probiotics; compounds that promote the flourishing of these bacteria are termed, prebiotics. Whether microbiome influencing therapies could treat psychiatric conditions, including depression and anxiety, is an area of interest. Presently, no established consensus for such treatment exists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review analyses databases and grey literature sites to investigate pre and/or probiotics as treatments for depression and/or anxiety disorders. Articles included are from within 15 years. Pre-determined inclusion exclusion criteria were applied, and articles were appraised for their quality using a modified-CASP checklist. This review focuses specifically on quantitative measures from patients with clinical diagnoses of depression and/or anxiety disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7 studies were identified. All demonstrated significant improvements in one or more of the outcomes measuring the of effect taking pre/probiotics compared with no treatment/placebo, or when compared to baseline measurements.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our review suggests utilising pre/probiotic may be a potentially useful adjunctive treatment. Furthermore, patients with certain co-morbidities, such as IBS, might experience greater benefits from such treatments, given that pre/probiotic are useful treatments for other conditions that were not the primary focus of this discourse. Our results are limited by several factors: sample sizes (adequate, though not robust); short study durations, long-term effects and propensity for remission undetermined.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results affirm that pre/probiotic therapy warrants further investigation. Efforts should aim to elucidate whether the perceived efficacy of pre/probiotic therapy in depression and/or anxiety disorders can be replicated in larger test populations, and whether such effects are maintained through continued treatment, or post cessation. Interventions should also be investigated in isolation, not combination, to ascertain where the observed effects are attributable to. Efforts to produce mechanistic explanations for such effect should be a priority.</p>","PeriodicalId":36307,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","volume":" ","pages":"351-362"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjnph-2019-000053","citationCount":"40","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food & mood: a review of supplementary prebiotic and probiotic interventions in the treatment of anxiety and depression in adults.\",\"authors\":\"Sanjay Noonan,&nbsp;Meena Zaveri,&nbsp;Elaine Macaninch,&nbsp;Kathy Martyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjnph-2019-000053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A bidirectional relationship exists between the brain and the gastrointestinal tract. Foods containing bacteria that positively influence the gastrointestinal microbiome are termed, probiotics; compounds that promote the flourishing of these bacteria are termed, prebiotics. Whether microbiome influencing therapies could treat psychiatric conditions, including depression and anxiety, is an area of interest. Presently, no established consensus for such treatment exists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review analyses databases and grey literature sites to investigate pre and/or probiotics as treatments for depression and/or anxiety disorders. Articles included are from within 15 years. Pre-determined inclusion exclusion criteria were applied, and articles were appraised for their quality using a modified-CASP checklist. This review focuses specifically on quantitative measures from patients with clinical diagnoses of depression and/or anxiety disorders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7 studies were identified. All demonstrated significant improvements in one or more of the outcomes measuring the of effect taking pre/probiotics compared with no treatment/placebo, or when compared to baseline measurements.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our review suggests utilising pre/probiotic may be a potentially useful adjunctive treatment. Furthermore, patients with certain co-morbidities, such as IBS, might experience greater benefits from such treatments, given that pre/probiotic are useful treatments for other conditions that were not the primary focus of this discourse. Our results are limited by several factors: sample sizes (adequate, though not robust); short study durations, long-term effects and propensity for remission undetermined.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results affirm that pre/probiotic therapy warrants further investigation. Efforts should aim to elucidate whether the perceived efficacy of pre/probiotic therapy in depression and/or anxiety disorders can be replicated in larger test populations, and whether such effects are maintained through continued treatment, or post cessation. Interventions should also be investigated in isolation, not combination, to ascertain where the observed effects are attributable to. Efforts to produce mechanistic explanations for such effect should be a priority.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"351-362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjnph-2019-000053\",\"citationCount\":\"40\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2019-000053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2019-000053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

摘要

背景:大脑和胃肠道之间存在双向关系。含有对胃肠道微生物群有积极影响的细菌的食物被称为益生菌;促进这些细菌繁殖的化合物被称为益生元。微生物组影响疗法是否可以治疗精神疾病,包括抑郁和焦虑,是一个感兴趣的领域。目前,对于这种治疗还没有达成共识。方法:本系统综述分析数据库和灰色文献网站,调查益生菌作为抑郁症和/或焦虑症的治疗方法。收录的文章都是15年内的。采用预先确定的纳入排除标准,并使用修改后的casp检查表评价文章的质量。本综述特别关注临床诊断为抑郁和/或焦虑障碍的患者的定量测量。结果:共纳入7项研究。与未治疗/安慰剂相比,或与基线测量相比,所有研究均表明,服用预益生菌/益生菌的效果在一项或多项结果上有显著改善。讨论:我们的综述建议使用预益生菌/益生菌可能是一种潜在有用的辅助治疗。此外,患有某些合并症(如肠易激综合征)的患者可能会从这种治疗中获得更大的益处,因为益生菌预处理对其他疾病是有用的治疗方法,而这些疾病并不是本文的主要焦点。我们的结果受到几个因素的限制:样本量(足够,但不稳健);短期研究持续时间,长期影响和缓解倾向尚不确定。结论:我们的研究结果证实益生菌前治疗值得进一步研究。努力的目的应该是阐明益生菌治疗对抑郁症和/或焦虑症的疗效是否可以在更大的测试人群中复制,以及这种效果是否可以通过继续治疗或停止治疗来维持。干预措施也应单独调查,而不是联合调查,以确定观察到的效果可归因于何处。对这种效应作出机械解释的努力应该是一个优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Food & mood: a review of supplementary prebiotic and probiotic interventions in the treatment of anxiety and depression in adults.

Food & mood: a review of supplementary prebiotic and probiotic interventions in the treatment of anxiety and depression in adults.

Background: A bidirectional relationship exists between the brain and the gastrointestinal tract. Foods containing bacteria that positively influence the gastrointestinal microbiome are termed, probiotics; compounds that promote the flourishing of these bacteria are termed, prebiotics. Whether microbiome influencing therapies could treat psychiatric conditions, including depression and anxiety, is an area of interest. Presently, no established consensus for such treatment exists.

Methods: This systematic review analyses databases and grey literature sites to investigate pre and/or probiotics as treatments for depression and/or anxiety disorders. Articles included are from within 15 years. Pre-determined inclusion exclusion criteria were applied, and articles were appraised for their quality using a modified-CASP checklist. This review focuses specifically on quantitative measures from patients with clinical diagnoses of depression and/or anxiety disorders.

Results: 7 studies were identified. All demonstrated significant improvements in one or more of the outcomes measuring the of effect taking pre/probiotics compared with no treatment/placebo, or when compared to baseline measurements.

Discussion: Our review suggests utilising pre/probiotic may be a potentially useful adjunctive treatment. Furthermore, patients with certain co-morbidities, such as IBS, might experience greater benefits from such treatments, given that pre/probiotic are useful treatments for other conditions that were not the primary focus of this discourse. Our results are limited by several factors: sample sizes (adequate, though not robust); short study durations, long-term effects and propensity for remission undetermined.

Conclusion: Our results affirm that pre/probiotic therapy warrants further investigation. Efforts should aim to elucidate whether the perceived efficacy of pre/probiotic therapy in depression and/or anxiety disorders can be replicated in larger test populations, and whether such effects are maintained through continued treatment, or post cessation. Interventions should also be investigated in isolation, not combination, to ascertain where the observed effects are attributable to. Efforts to produce mechanistic explanations for such effect should be a priority.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention and Health Nursing-Nutrition and Dietetics
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信