氯氮平与其他抗精神病药物对临床结果和脑内多巴胺释放的不同影响。

Essential psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2005-01-01
Claire Advokat
{"title":"氯氮平与其他抗精神病药物对临床结果和脑内多巴胺释放的不同影响。","authors":"Claire Advokat","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The first atypical antipsychotic, clozapine (Clozaril), dramatically improved the outcome of treatment of patients with schizophrenia in two ways. First, it reduced psychotic symptoms without eliciting significant neurological side effects. Second, it was effective in approximately 30% of individuals who were previously refractory to treatment. Efforts to develop similar drugs have been partially successful in that newer antipsychotics are also less likely to produce neurological side effects. However, it has not yet been established that the newest antipsychotics are more effective than conventional agents in individuals who are refractory to treatment. In the first part of this review, the results of studies that evaluated the new antipsychotics and provided an outcome measure of response rate (regardless of how this index was defined) are summarized. Even with this broad criterion, the evidence suggests that the newer antipsychotics do not share the clinical advantages of clozapine. To explore the possible mechanisms for the clinical advantage of clozapine, evidence of antipsychotic-induced dopamine release in the brain is discussed in the second half of this article. This analysis indicates that acute clozapine administration induces the release of more dopamine in the cortex than in the striatum or limbic system. With conventional antipsychotics, this relationship is reversed. The newest antipsychotics do not show a preference among these sites. Moreover, after long-term treatment, tolerance develops to haloperidol, but not to clozapine, with regard to the amount of dopamine released in the brain. No data are available on the newest antipsychotics. Although more studies need to be done-especially studies of the effects of long-term administration of various conventional and atypical antipsychotics-this distinction might be relevant to the unique clinical advantage of clozapine.</p>","PeriodicalId":87179,"journal":{"name":"Essential psychopharmacology","volume":"6 2","pages":"73-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential effects of clozapine versus other antipsychotics on clinical outcome and dopamine release in the brain.\",\"authors\":\"Claire Advokat\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The first atypical antipsychotic, clozapine (Clozaril), dramatically improved the outcome of treatment of patients with schizophrenia in two ways. First, it reduced psychotic symptoms without eliciting significant neurological side effects. Second, it was effective in approximately 30% of individuals who were previously refractory to treatment. Efforts to develop similar drugs have been partially successful in that newer antipsychotics are also less likely to produce neurological side effects. However, it has not yet been established that the newest antipsychotics are more effective than conventional agents in individuals who are refractory to treatment. In the first part of this review, the results of studies that evaluated the new antipsychotics and provided an outcome measure of response rate (regardless of how this index was defined) are summarized. Even with this broad criterion, the evidence suggests that the newer antipsychotics do not share the clinical advantages of clozapine. To explore the possible mechanisms for the clinical advantage of clozapine, evidence of antipsychotic-induced dopamine release in the brain is discussed in the second half of this article. This analysis indicates that acute clozapine administration induces the release of more dopamine in the cortex than in the striatum or limbic system. With conventional antipsychotics, this relationship is reversed. The newest antipsychotics do not show a preference among these sites. Moreover, after long-term treatment, tolerance develops to haloperidol, but not to clozapine, with regard to the amount of dopamine released in the brain. No data are available on the newest antipsychotics. Although more studies need to be done-especially studies of the effects of long-term administration of various conventional and atypical antipsychotics-this distinction might be relevant to the unique clinical advantage of clozapine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Essential psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"73-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Essential psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Essential psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第一种非典型抗精神病药物氯氮平(Clozaril)在两方面显著改善了精神分裂症患者的治疗效果。首先,它减轻了精神病症状,但没有引起明显的神经副作用。其次,它对大约30%以前难以治疗的个体有效。开发类似药物的努力已经取得了部分成功,因为新的抗精神病药物也不太可能产生神经系统副作用。然而,它还没有确定,最新的抗精神病药物比传统药物更有效的个体难治性治疗。在本综述的第一部分,总结了评估新型抗精神病药物的研究结果,并提供了反应率的结果测量(无论该指标如何定义)。即使有这个宽泛的标准,证据表明新的抗精神病药物并不具有氯氮平的临床优势。为了探索氯氮平临床优势的可能机制,本文的后半部分讨论了抗精神病药物诱导的大脑多巴胺释放的证据。这一分析表明,急性氯氮平管理诱导释放更多的多巴胺在皮质比在纹状体或边缘系统。对于传统的抗精神病药物,这种关系是相反的。最新的抗精神病药物在这些部位之间没有表现出偏好。此外,在长期治疗后,对氟哌啶醇产生耐受性,而对氯氮平则没有,这与大脑中释放的多巴胺量有关。没有最新的抗精神病药物的数据。尽管需要做更多的研究,特别是对各种常规和非典型抗精神病药物长期服用效果的研究,但这种区别可能与氯氮平独特的临床优势有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential effects of clozapine versus other antipsychotics on clinical outcome and dopamine release in the brain.

The first atypical antipsychotic, clozapine (Clozaril), dramatically improved the outcome of treatment of patients with schizophrenia in two ways. First, it reduced psychotic symptoms without eliciting significant neurological side effects. Second, it was effective in approximately 30% of individuals who were previously refractory to treatment. Efforts to develop similar drugs have been partially successful in that newer antipsychotics are also less likely to produce neurological side effects. However, it has not yet been established that the newest antipsychotics are more effective than conventional agents in individuals who are refractory to treatment. In the first part of this review, the results of studies that evaluated the new antipsychotics and provided an outcome measure of response rate (regardless of how this index was defined) are summarized. Even with this broad criterion, the evidence suggests that the newer antipsychotics do not share the clinical advantages of clozapine. To explore the possible mechanisms for the clinical advantage of clozapine, evidence of antipsychotic-induced dopamine release in the brain is discussed in the second half of this article. This analysis indicates that acute clozapine administration induces the release of more dopamine in the cortex than in the striatum or limbic system. With conventional antipsychotics, this relationship is reversed. The newest antipsychotics do not show a preference among these sites. Moreover, after long-term treatment, tolerance develops to haloperidol, but not to clozapine, with regard to the amount of dopamine released in the brain. No data are available on the newest antipsychotics. Although more studies need to be done-especially studies of the effects of long-term administration of various conventional and atypical antipsychotics-this distinction might be relevant to the unique clinical advantage of clozapine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信