使用最大似然拟合分布:方法和包。

Denis Cousineau, Scott Brown, Andrew Heathcote
{"title":"使用最大似然拟合分布:方法和包。","authors":"Denis Cousineau,&nbsp;Scott Brown,&nbsp;Andrew Heathcote","doi":"10.3758/bf03206555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The most powerful tests of response time (RT) models often involve the whole shape of the RT distribution, thus avoiding mimicking that can occur at the level of RT means and variances. Nonparametric distribution estimation is, in principle, the most appropriate approach, but such estimators are sometimes difficult to obtain. On the other hand, distribution fitting, given an algebraic function, is both easy and compact. We review the general approach to performing distribution fitting with maximum likelihood (ML) and a method based on quantiles (quantile maximum probability, QMP). We show that QMP has both small bias and good efficiency when used with common distribution functions (the ex-Gaussian, Gumbel, lognormal, Wald, and Weibull distributions). In addition, we review some software packages performing ML (PASTIS, QMPE, DISFIT, and MATHEMATICA) and compare their results. In general, the differences between packages have little influence on the optimal solution found, but the form of the distribution function has: Both the lognormal and the Wald distributions have non-linear dependencies between the parameter estimates that tend to increase the overall bias in parameter recovery and to decrease efficiency. We conclude by laying out a few pointers on how to relate descriptive models of RT to cognitive models of RT. A program that generated the random deviates used in our studies may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/.</p>","PeriodicalId":79800,"journal":{"name":"Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc","volume":"36 4","pages":"742-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3758/bf03206555","citationCount":"163","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: methods and packages.\",\"authors\":\"Denis Cousineau,&nbsp;Scott Brown,&nbsp;Andrew Heathcote\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/bf03206555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The most powerful tests of response time (RT) models often involve the whole shape of the RT distribution, thus avoiding mimicking that can occur at the level of RT means and variances. Nonparametric distribution estimation is, in principle, the most appropriate approach, but such estimators are sometimes difficult to obtain. On the other hand, distribution fitting, given an algebraic function, is both easy and compact. We review the general approach to performing distribution fitting with maximum likelihood (ML) and a method based on quantiles (quantile maximum probability, QMP). We show that QMP has both small bias and good efficiency when used with common distribution functions (the ex-Gaussian, Gumbel, lognormal, Wald, and Weibull distributions). In addition, we review some software packages performing ML (PASTIS, QMPE, DISFIT, and MATHEMATICA) and compare their results. In general, the differences between packages have little influence on the optimal solution found, but the form of the distribution function has: Both the lognormal and the Wald distributions have non-linear dependencies between the parameter estimates that tend to increase the overall bias in parameter recovery and to decrease efficiency. We conclude by laying out a few pointers on how to relate descriptive models of RT to cognitive models of RT. A program that generated the random deviates used in our studies may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"742-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3758/bf03206555\",\"citationCount\":\"163\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 163

摘要

响应时间(RT)模型的最强大的测试通常涉及RT分布的整个形状,从而避免在RT均值和方差水平上可能发生的模仿。原则上,非参数分布估计是最合适的方法,但这种估计有时很难获得。另一方面,给定一个代数函数,分布拟合既简单又紧凑。我们回顾了使用最大似然(ML)执行分布拟合的一般方法和基于分位数(分位数最大概率,QMP)的方法。我们表明,当与常见分布函数(前高斯分布、Gumbel分布、对数正态分布、Wald分布和威布尔分布)一起使用时,QMP具有小偏差和良好的效率。此外,我们回顾了一些执行ML的软件包(PASTIS、QMPE、DISFIT和MATHEMATICA),并比较了它们的结果。一般来说,包之间的差异对找到的最优解影响不大,但分布函数的形式有:对数正态分布和Wald分布在参数估计之间具有非线性依赖关系,倾向于增加参数恢复的总体偏差并降低效率。最后,我们列出了一些关于如何将RT的描述性模型与RT的认知模型联系起来的指针。生成我们研究中使用的随机偏差的程序可以从www.psychonomic.org/archive/下载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fitting distributions using maximum likelihood: methods and packages.

The most powerful tests of response time (RT) models often involve the whole shape of the RT distribution, thus avoiding mimicking that can occur at the level of RT means and variances. Nonparametric distribution estimation is, in principle, the most appropriate approach, but such estimators are sometimes difficult to obtain. On the other hand, distribution fitting, given an algebraic function, is both easy and compact. We review the general approach to performing distribution fitting with maximum likelihood (ML) and a method based on quantiles (quantile maximum probability, QMP). We show that QMP has both small bias and good efficiency when used with common distribution functions (the ex-Gaussian, Gumbel, lognormal, Wald, and Weibull distributions). In addition, we review some software packages performing ML (PASTIS, QMPE, DISFIT, and MATHEMATICA) and compare their results. In general, the differences between packages have little influence on the optimal solution found, but the form of the distribution function has: Both the lognormal and the Wald distributions have non-linear dependencies between the parameter estimates that tend to increase the overall bias in parameter recovery and to decrease efficiency. We conclude by laying out a few pointers on how to relate descriptive models of RT to cognitive models of RT. A program that generated the random deviates used in our studies may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive/.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信