{"title":"对报告统计数据的期刊指南的评论。","authors":"John Ludbrook","doi":"10.1111/j.1440-1681.2005.04221.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This letter is prompted by 10 detailed guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by The American Physiological Society. 1 I take issue with several of these guidelines. I also take issue with the two short paragraphs on statistics in the ‘Instructions to Authors’ issued by Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology (CEEP). I have tried to resolve these differences. In his ‘Instructions for Authors’, the Editor-in-Chief of CEPP provides two short paragraphs of advice to prospective authors on how to present descriptive and analytical statistics (see the website http://www.blackwellpublishingasia.com). CEPP subscribes to the policies of The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) (see the website http://www.icmje.org/). Should our Editor-in-Chief or the ICMJE do more? In contrast, the American Journals of Physiology have recently published an Editorial by Douglas Curran-Everett and Dale J. Benos in which they give 10, very detailed, guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society (APS) (see the website http://www.ajpregu.org for details). 1 The APS adheres to the policies of the Council of Science Editors (CSE) (see the website http://www.councilscienceeditors.org). In this letter, I attempt to resolve the differences between minimalists and maximalists. I shall start to do this by considering the recommendations of Curran-Everett and Benos one-by-one.","PeriodicalId":10259,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology","volume":"32 4","pages":"324-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2005.04221.x","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comments on journal guidelines for reporting statistics.\",\"authors\":\"John Ludbrook\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1440-1681.2005.04221.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This letter is prompted by 10 detailed guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by The American Physiological Society. 1 I take issue with several of these guidelines. I also take issue with the two short paragraphs on statistics in the ‘Instructions to Authors’ issued by Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology (CEEP). I have tried to resolve these differences. In his ‘Instructions for Authors’, the Editor-in-Chief of CEPP provides two short paragraphs of advice to prospective authors on how to present descriptive and analytical statistics (see the website http://www.blackwellpublishingasia.com). CEPP subscribes to the policies of The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) (see the website http://www.icmje.org/). Should our Editor-in-Chief or the ICMJE do more? In contrast, the American Journals of Physiology have recently published an Editorial by Douglas Curran-Everett and Dale J. Benos in which they give 10, very detailed, guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society (APS) (see the website http://www.ajpregu.org for details). 1 The APS adheres to the policies of the Council of Science Editors (CSE) (see the website http://www.councilscienceeditors.org). In this letter, I attempt to resolve the differences between minimalists and maximalists. I shall start to do this by considering the recommendations of Curran-Everett and Benos one-by-one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"324-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2005.04221.x\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2005.04221.x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.2005.04221.x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comments on journal guidelines for reporting statistics.
This letter is prompted by 10 detailed guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by The American Physiological Society. 1 I take issue with several of these guidelines. I also take issue with the two short paragraphs on statistics in the ‘Instructions to Authors’ issued by Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology (CEEP). I have tried to resolve these differences. In his ‘Instructions for Authors’, the Editor-in-Chief of CEPP provides two short paragraphs of advice to prospective authors on how to present descriptive and analytical statistics (see the website http://www.blackwellpublishingasia.com). CEPP subscribes to the policies of The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) (see the website http://www.icmje.org/). Should our Editor-in-Chief or the ICMJE do more? In contrast, the American Journals of Physiology have recently published an Editorial by Douglas Curran-Everett and Dale J. Benos in which they give 10, very detailed, guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society (APS) (see the website http://www.ajpregu.org for details). 1 The APS adheres to the policies of the Council of Science Editors (CSE) (see the website http://www.councilscienceeditors.org). In this letter, I attempt to resolve the differences between minimalists and maximalists. I shall start to do this by considering the recommendations of Curran-Everett and Benos one-by-one.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology is an international journal founded in 1974 by Mike Rand, Austin Doyle, John Coghlan and Paul Korner. Our focus is new frontiers in physiology and pharmacology, emphasizing the translation of basic research to clinical practice. We publish original articles, invited reviews and our exciting, cutting-edge Frontiers-in-Research series’.