家庭干预对复发性乳腺癌妇女及其家庭照顾者生活质量的影响。

Psycho-Oncology Pub Date : 2005-06-01 DOI:10.1002/pon.871
Laurel Northouse, Trace Kershaw, Darlene Mood, Ann Schafenacker
{"title":"家庭干预对复发性乳腺癌妇女及其家庭照顾者生活质量的影响。","authors":"Laurel Northouse,&nbsp;Trace Kershaw,&nbsp;Darlene Mood,&nbsp;Ann Schafenacker","doi":"10.1002/pon.871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine if patients with advanced breast cancer and their family caregivers, who participated in a family based intervention, report better quality of life and other psychosocial outcomes than dyads who received standard care alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a randomized clinical trial, 134 patients and their family caregivers were assigned to usual care (control) or to usual care plus the family intervention (experimental condition). Dyads were assessed at baseline, three- and six-months later. The intervention consisted of five sessions and addressed family involvement, optimistic attitude, coping effectiveness, uncertainty reduction, and symptom management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the family intervention reported significantly less hopelessness and less negative appraisal of illness than controls; their family caregivers reported significantly less negative appraisal of caregiving. Intervention effects were evident at three-months, but were not sustained at six-months. No difference was found in the quality of life of dyads in experimental or control conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the family intervention had positive effects initially, these effects were not sustained over time. Future studies need to consider program dose and duration of effect, outcome measures that are more sensitive to change, and realistic end-points for patients with advanced cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":516935,"journal":{"name":"Psycho-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"478-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pon.871","citationCount":"305","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of a family intervention on the quality of life of women with recurrent breast cancer and their family caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Laurel Northouse,&nbsp;Trace Kershaw,&nbsp;Darlene Mood,&nbsp;Ann Schafenacker\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pon.871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine if patients with advanced breast cancer and their family caregivers, who participated in a family based intervention, report better quality of life and other psychosocial outcomes than dyads who received standard care alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a randomized clinical trial, 134 patients and their family caregivers were assigned to usual care (control) or to usual care plus the family intervention (experimental condition). Dyads were assessed at baseline, three- and six-months later. The intervention consisted of five sessions and addressed family involvement, optimistic attitude, coping effectiveness, uncertainty reduction, and symptom management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the family intervention reported significantly less hopelessness and less negative appraisal of illness than controls; their family caregivers reported significantly less negative appraisal of caregiving. Intervention effects were evident at three-months, but were not sustained at six-months. No difference was found in the quality of life of dyads in experimental or control conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the family intervention had positive effects initially, these effects were not sustained over time. Future studies need to consider program dose and duration of effect, outcome measures that are more sensitive to change, and realistic end-points for patients with advanced cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psycho-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"478-91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/pon.871\",\"citationCount\":\"305\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psycho-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 305

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是确定参加以家庭为基础的干预的晚期乳腺癌患者及其家庭照顾者是否比单独接受标准治疗的双组患者报告更好的生活质量和其他社会心理结果。方法:采用随机临床试验方法,将134例患者及其家庭护理人员分为常规护理组(对照组)和常规护理加家庭干预组(实验组)。二人组分别在基线、3个月和6个月后进行评估。干预包括五个阶段,涉及家庭参与、乐观态度、应对效果、减少不确定性和症状管理。结果:家庭干预组患者对疾病的绝望感和消极评价明显低于对照组;他们的家庭照顾者对照顾的负面评价显著减少。干预效果在3个月时明显,但在6个月时不持续。在实验和对照条件下,两组的生活质量没有差异。结论:虽然家庭干预最初有积极的效果,但这些效果并不能持续一段时间。未来的研究需要考虑方案剂量和效果持续时间,对变化更敏感的结局指标,以及晚期癌症患者的现实终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of a family intervention on the quality of life of women with recurrent breast cancer and their family caregivers.

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine if patients with advanced breast cancer and their family caregivers, who participated in a family based intervention, report better quality of life and other psychosocial outcomes than dyads who received standard care alone.

Methods: Using a randomized clinical trial, 134 patients and their family caregivers were assigned to usual care (control) or to usual care plus the family intervention (experimental condition). Dyads were assessed at baseline, three- and six-months later. The intervention consisted of five sessions and addressed family involvement, optimistic attitude, coping effectiveness, uncertainty reduction, and symptom management.

Results: Patients in the family intervention reported significantly less hopelessness and less negative appraisal of illness than controls; their family caregivers reported significantly less negative appraisal of caregiving. Intervention effects were evident at three-months, but were not sustained at six-months. No difference was found in the quality of life of dyads in experimental or control conditions.

Conclusions: Although the family intervention had positive effects initially, these effects were not sustained over time. Future studies need to consider program dose and duration of effect, outcome measures that are more sensitive to change, and realistic end-points for patients with advanced cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信