解读英国新生儿HIV血清阳性率数据:差异生育的重要性。

S Cliffe, M Cortina-Borja, A Nicoll, M L Newell
{"title":"解读英国新生儿HIV血清阳性率数据:差异生育的重要性。","authors":"S Cliffe,&nbsp;M Cortina-Borja,&nbsp;A Nicoll,&nbsp;M L Newell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to derive more accurate estimates of HIV infection among the general population in Great Britain from unlinked anonymous neonatal seroprevalence data, the differential HIV and fertility patterns amongst groups of women were explored. The HIV risk in women was estimated using neonatal seroprevalence data and reports of diagnoses of HIV infection in pregnant women. Live birth rates were estimated using population data and these were supplemented using data from a prospective European cohort of HIV-infected pregnant women. HIV prevalence was higher in women born in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and injecting drug users (IDUs) (2.50% and 0.29% respectively in London) compared to other women (0.068%). Fertility was also higher in women born in SSA (OR 1.33 using population data), whilst IDUs were more likely to have had a previous termination (OR 1.48 using the European cohort of HIV-infected pregnant women data). We conclude that when unlinked anonymous neonatal seroprevalence data is used to estimate general population prevalence, adjustments need to be made for fertility differentials in population subgroups at varying risk of HIV.</p>","PeriodicalId":72640,"journal":{"name":"Communicable disease and public health","volume":"7 1","pages":"30-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interpreting neonatal HIV seroprevalence data in Great Britain: the importance of differential fertility.\",\"authors\":\"S Cliffe,&nbsp;M Cortina-Borja,&nbsp;A Nicoll,&nbsp;M L Newell\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In order to derive more accurate estimates of HIV infection among the general population in Great Britain from unlinked anonymous neonatal seroprevalence data, the differential HIV and fertility patterns amongst groups of women were explored. The HIV risk in women was estimated using neonatal seroprevalence data and reports of diagnoses of HIV infection in pregnant women. Live birth rates were estimated using population data and these were supplemented using data from a prospective European cohort of HIV-infected pregnant women. HIV prevalence was higher in women born in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and injecting drug users (IDUs) (2.50% and 0.29% respectively in London) compared to other women (0.068%). Fertility was also higher in women born in SSA (OR 1.33 using population data), whilst IDUs were more likely to have had a previous termination (OR 1.48 using the European cohort of HIV-infected pregnant women data). We conclude that when unlinked anonymous neonatal seroprevalence data is used to estimate general population prevalence, adjustments need to be made for fertility differentials in population subgroups at varying risk of HIV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communicable disease and public health\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"30-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communicable disease and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicable disease and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了从不相关的匿名新生儿血清患病率数据中得出英国普通人群中艾滋病毒感染的更准确估计,研究人员探索了不同妇女群体中艾滋病毒和生育模式的差异。利用新生儿血清阳性率数据和孕妇艾滋病毒感染诊断报告估计妇女的艾滋病毒风险。使用人口数据估计活产率,并使用来自欧洲艾滋病毒感染孕妇的前瞻性队列数据进行补充。出生在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)和注射吸毒者(IDUs)的妇女的艾滋病毒感染率(伦敦分别为2.50%和0.29%)高于其他妇女(0.068%)。在SSA出生的妇女的生育能力也较高(使用人口数据的OR为1.33),而注射吸毒者更有可能之前终止妊娠(使用欧洲艾滋病毒感染孕妇队列数据的OR为1.48)。我们的结论是,当使用不相关的匿名新生儿血清阳性率数据来估计一般人群患病率时,需要对不同艾滋病毒风险人群亚组的生育差异进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interpreting neonatal HIV seroprevalence data in Great Britain: the importance of differential fertility.

In order to derive more accurate estimates of HIV infection among the general population in Great Britain from unlinked anonymous neonatal seroprevalence data, the differential HIV and fertility patterns amongst groups of women were explored. The HIV risk in women was estimated using neonatal seroprevalence data and reports of diagnoses of HIV infection in pregnant women. Live birth rates were estimated using population data and these were supplemented using data from a prospective European cohort of HIV-infected pregnant women. HIV prevalence was higher in women born in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and injecting drug users (IDUs) (2.50% and 0.29% respectively in London) compared to other women (0.068%). Fertility was also higher in women born in SSA (OR 1.33 using population data), whilst IDUs were more likely to have had a previous termination (OR 1.48 using the European cohort of HIV-infected pregnant women data). We conclude that when unlinked anonymous neonatal seroprevalence data is used to estimate general population prevalence, adjustments need to be made for fertility differentials in population subgroups at varying risk of HIV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信