建立一种实时荧光定量PCR方法测定微生物群落中脱盐杆菌属、脱盐球菌属和脱硫杆菌属的数量

IF 1.9 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Theo H.M Smits, Christiane Devenoges, Katia Szynalski, Julien Maillard, Christof Holliger
{"title":"建立一种实时荧光定量PCR方法测定微生物群落中脱盐杆菌属、脱盐球菌属和脱硫杆菌属的数量","authors":"Theo H.M Smits,&nbsp;Christiane Devenoges,&nbsp;Katia Szynalski,&nbsp;Julien Maillard,&nbsp;Christof Holliger","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2004.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>We developed standard curves based on plasmids containing a 16S rRNA gene of a member of one of the three genera </span><em>Dehalobacter</em>, <span><em>Desulfitobacterium</em></span>, and <span><em>Dehalococcoides</em></span><span>. A large difference in amplification efficiency between the standard curves was observed ranging from 1.5 to 2.0. The total eubacterial 16S rRNA gene copy number determined in a sample DNA by using eubacterial primers and the three standard curves led to differences in the estimated copy numbers of a factor up to 73. However, the amplification efficiencies for one specific standard curve were the same independent of the PCR primer pair used. This allowed the determination of the abundance of a population expressed as fractional number, hence, the percentage of genus-specific copy numbers within the total eubacterial 16S rRNA gene copy numbers. Determination of the fractional numbers in DNA mixtures of known composition showed the accuracy of this approach. The average difference in threshold value between two 10-fold dilutions of DNA of pure cultures, mixtures thereof and of environmental samples was −3.45±0.34, corresponding to an average almost optimal amplification efficiency of 1.95. This indicated that the low amplification efficiency of certain standard curves seemed to be mainly a problem of the plasmid DNA used and not of the 16S rRNA gene of the target genera.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"57 3","pages":"Pages 369-378"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mimet.2004.02.003","citationCount":"201","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a real-time PCR method for quantification of the three genera Dehalobacter, Dehalococcoides, and Desulfitobacterium in microbial communities\",\"authors\":\"Theo H.M Smits,&nbsp;Christiane Devenoges,&nbsp;Katia Szynalski,&nbsp;Julien Maillard,&nbsp;Christof Holliger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mimet.2004.02.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>We developed standard curves based on plasmids containing a 16S rRNA gene of a member of one of the three genera </span><em>Dehalobacter</em>, <span><em>Desulfitobacterium</em></span>, and <span><em>Dehalococcoides</em></span><span>. A large difference in amplification efficiency between the standard curves was observed ranging from 1.5 to 2.0. The total eubacterial 16S rRNA gene copy number determined in a sample DNA by using eubacterial primers and the three standard curves led to differences in the estimated copy numbers of a factor up to 73. However, the amplification efficiencies for one specific standard curve were the same independent of the PCR primer pair used. This allowed the determination of the abundance of a population expressed as fractional number, hence, the percentage of genus-specific copy numbers within the total eubacterial 16S rRNA gene copy numbers. Determination of the fractional numbers in DNA mixtures of known composition showed the accuracy of this approach. The average difference in threshold value between two 10-fold dilutions of DNA of pure cultures, mixtures thereof and of environmental samples was −3.45±0.34, corresponding to an average almost optimal amplification efficiency of 1.95. This indicated that the low amplification efficiency of certain standard curves seemed to be mainly a problem of the plasmid DNA used and not of the 16S rRNA gene of the target genera.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"volume\":\"57 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 369-378\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.mimet.2004.02.003\",\"citationCount\":\"201\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016770120400048X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016770120400048X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 201

摘要

我们根据Dehalobacter、Desulfitobacterium和dehalococides三个属中的一个成员的含有16S rRNA基因的质粒建立了标准曲线。两种标准曲线的放大效率差异较大,范围在1.5 ~ 2.0之间。利用真细菌引物和三条标准曲线测定样品DNA中真细菌16S rRNA基因的总拷贝数,导致估计拷贝数的差异高达73个因子。然而,一个特定的标准曲线的扩增效率是相同的,与使用的PCR引物对无关。这允许以分数表示的种群丰度的测定,因此,属特异性拷贝数在真菌体16S rRNA基因拷贝数总数中的百分比。在已知成分的DNA混合物中分数的测定表明了这种方法的准确性。纯培养物、混合培养物和环境样品DNA两次10倍稀释的阈值平均差值为−3.45±0.34,对应于平均几乎最优的扩增效率为1.95。这表明,某些标准曲线的扩增效率低,主要是质粒DNA的问题,而不是目的属的16S rRNA基因的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a real-time PCR method for quantification of the three genera Dehalobacter, Dehalococcoides, and Desulfitobacterium in microbial communities

We developed standard curves based on plasmids containing a 16S rRNA gene of a member of one of the three genera Dehalobacter, Desulfitobacterium, and Dehalococcoides. A large difference in amplification efficiency between the standard curves was observed ranging from 1.5 to 2.0. The total eubacterial 16S rRNA gene copy number determined in a sample DNA by using eubacterial primers and the three standard curves led to differences in the estimated copy numbers of a factor up to 73. However, the amplification efficiencies for one specific standard curve were the same independent of the PCR primer pair used. This allowed the determination of the abundance of a population expressed as fractional number, hence, the percentage of genus-specific copy numbers within the total eubacterial 16S rRNA gene copy numbers. Determination of the fractional numbers in DNA mixtures of known composition showed the accuracy of this approach. The average difference in threshold value between two 10-fold dilutions of DNA of pure cultures, mixtures thereof and of environmental samples was −3.45±0.34, corresponding to an average almost optimal amplification efficiency of 1.95. This indicated that the low amplification efficiency of certain standard curves seemed to be mainly a problem of the plasmid DNA used and not of the 16S rRNA gene of the target genera.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of microbiological methods
Journal of microbiological methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
151
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach. All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信