快速心房起搏能终止心房颤动吗?实验室和设备终止研究的比较。

Andrew R J Mitchell, Neil Sulke
{"title":"快速心房起搏能终止心房颤动吗?实验室和设备终止研究的比较。","authors":"Andrew R J Mitchell,&nbsp;Neil Sulke","doi":"10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023137.24735.6b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation is understood to be a re-entrant arrhythmia and for many years electrophysiologists have attempted to pace-terminate the rhythm. Several studies have demonstrated that an excitable gap is present during atrial fibrillation and that the capture of small amounts of atrial tissue is possible. Early attempts to terminate atrial fibrillation however were unsuccessful. The rapid development of pacemaker and defibrillator technology has provided an exciting new direction for the treatment of recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Results from studies of the effectiveness of atrial anti-tachycardia pacing algorithms have suggested that 50% of atrial arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation) can be pace-terminated. These findings conflict with data from the electrophysiology laboratory where atrial fibrillation has yet to be convincingly terminated. In this review, the current literature is discussed and possible reasons for this discrepancy are proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":80888,"journal":{"name":"Cardiac electrophysiology review","volume":"7 4","pages":"352-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023137.24735.6b","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does rapid atrial pacing terminate atrial fibrillation? A comparison of laboratory and device termination studies.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew R J Mitchell,&nbsp;Neil Sulke\",\"doi\":\"10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023137.24735.6b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Atrial fibrillation is understood to be a re-entrant arrhythmia and for many years electrophysiologists have attempted to pace-terminate the rhythm. Several studies have demonstrated that an excitable gap is present during atrial fibrillation and that the capture of small amounts of atrial tissue is possible. Early attempts to terminate atrial fibrillation however were unsuccessful. The rapid development of pacemaker and defibrillator technology has provided an exciting new direction for the treatment of recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Results from studies of the effectiveness of atrial anti-tachycardia pacing algorithms have suggested that 50% of atrial arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation) can be pace-terminated. These findings conflict with data from the electrophysiology laboratory where atrial fibrillation has yet to be convincingly terminated. In this review, the current literature is discussed and possible reasons for this discrepancy are proposed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":80888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiac electrophysiology review\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"352-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023137.24735.6b\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiac electrophysiology review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023137.24735.6b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiac electrophysiology review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CEPR.0000023137.24735.6b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

心房颤动被认为是一种再入性心律失常,多年来电生理学家一直试图终止心律。几项研究表明,心房颤动期间存在可兴奋间隙,捕获少量心房组织是可能的。然而,早期尝试终止心房颤动是不成功的。起搏器和除颤器技术的快速发展为复发性症状性心房颤动的治疗提供了令人兴奋的新方向。对心房抗心动过速起搏算法有效性的研究结果表明,50%的心房心律失常(包括心房颤动)可以终止起搏。这些发现与电生理学实验室的数据相冲突,其中心房颤动尚未令人信服地终止。在这篇综述中,讨论了目前的文献,并提出了这种差异的可能原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does rapid atrial pacing terminate atrial fibrillation? A comparison of laboratory and device termination studies.

Atrial fibrillation is understood to be a re-entrant arrhythmia and for many years electrophysiologists have attempted to pace-terminate the rhythm. Several studies have demonstrated that an excitable gap is present during atrial fibrillation and that the capture of small amounts of atrial tissue is possible. Early attempts to terminate atrial fibrillation however were unsuccessful. The rapid development of pacemaker and defibrillator technology has provided an exciting new direction for the treatment of recurrent symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Results from studies of the effectiveness of atrial anti-tachycardia pacing algorithms have suggested that 50% of atrial arrhythmias (including atrial fibrillation) can be pace-terminated. These findings conflict with data from the electrophysiology laboratory where atrial fibrillation has yet to be convincingly terminated. In this review, the current literature is discussed and possible reasons for this discrepancy are proposed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信