{"title":"局部脊增强/保存。系统回顾","authors":"Joseph P. Fiorellini, Marc L. Nevins","doi":"10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background:</b> Osseointegrated implants have been documented as efficacious, however, their placement may be contraindicated in some patients due to insufficient bone volume. Techniques such as guided bone regeneration (GBR), immediate implantation, and distraction osteogenesis (DO) have been utilized as ridge enhancement therapies.</p><p><b>Rationale:</b> This systematic review evaluates dental implant survival rates in patients treated with ridge augmentation or preservation techniques.</p><p><b>Focused Question:</b> In patients requiring dental implant placement, what is the effect of localized ridge preservation versus implant placement without augmentation on implant survival and adverse effects?</p><p><b>Search Protocol:</b> MEDLINE and Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialized Trial Register were searched. Hand searches were performed on <i>Clinical Oral Implants Research, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Journal of Periodontology,</i> and <i>Journal of Periodontal Research</i>. All searches were performed for articles published through April 2002.</p><p><b>Selection Criteria:</b>Publications reporting survival rate of dental implants following ridge therapy were included in the analysis. Reports describing techniques were excluded.</p><p><b>Data Collection and Analysis:</b>Due to the absence of controlled studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. Descriptive statistics are used to report the data.\n\n </p><p><b>Reviewers' Interpretations:</b> Survival rates were similar for both GBR and DO implants. These survival rates were similar to implants placed in native bone.</p><p><i>Ann Periodontol 2003;8:321-327.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":79473,"journal":{"name":"Annals of periodontology","volume":"8 1","pages":"321-327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.321","citationCount":"178","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Localized Ridge Augmentation/Preservation. A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Joseph P. Fiorellini, Marc L. Nevins\",\"doi\":\"10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Background:</b> Osseointegrated implants have been documented as efficacious, however, their placement may be contraindicated in some patients due to insufficient bone volume. Techniques such as guided bone regeneration (GBR), immediate implantation, and distraction osteogenesis (DO) have been utilized as ridge enhancement therapies.</p><p><b>Rationale:</b> This systematic review evaluates dental implant survival rates in patients treated with ridge augmentation or preservation techniques.</p><p><b>Focused Question:</b> In patients requiring dental implant placement, what is the effect of localized ridge preservation versus implant placement without augmentation on implant survival and adverse effects?</p><p><b>Search Protocol:</b> MEDLINE and Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialized Trial Register were searched. Hand searches were performed on <i>Clinical Oral Implants Research, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Journal of Periodontology,</i> and <i>Journal of Periodontal Research</i>. All searches were performed for articles published through April 2002.</p><p><b>Selection Criteria:</b>Publications reporting survival rate of dental implants following ridge therapy were included in the analysis. Reports describing techniques were excluded.</p><p><b>Data Collection and Analysis:</b>Due to the absence of controlled studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. Descriptive statistics are used to report the data.\\n\\n </p><p><b>Reviewers' Interpretations:</b> Survival rates were similar for both GBR and DO implants. These survival rates were similar to implants placed in native bone.</p><p><i>Ann Periodontol 2003;8:321-327.</i></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of periodontology\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"321-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.321\",\"citationCount\":\"178\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Localized Ridge Augmentation/Preservation. A Systematic Review
Background: Osseointegrated implants have been documented as efficacious, however, their placement may be contraindicated in some patients due to insufficient bone volume. Techniques such as guided bone regeneration (GBR), immediate implantation, and distraction osteogenesis (DO) have been utilized as ridge enhancement therapies.
Rationale: This systematic review evaluates dental implant survival rates in patients treated with ridge augmentation or preservation techniques.
Focused Question: In patients requiring dental implant placement, what is the effect of localized ridge preservation versus implant placement without augmentation on implant survival and adverse effects?
Search Protocol: MEDLINE and Cochrane Oral Health Group Specialized Trial Register were searched. Hand searches were performed on Clinical Oral Implants Research, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Journal of Clinical Periodontology, Journal of Periodontology, and Journal of Periodontal Research. All searches were performed for articles published through April 2002.
Selection Criteria:Publications reporting survival rate of dental implants following ridge therapy were included in the analysis. Reports describing techniques were excluded.
Data Collection and Analysis:Due to the absence of controlled studies, a meta-analysis was not performed. Descriptive statistics are used to report the data.
Reviewers' Interpretations: Survival rates were similar for both GBR and DO implants. These survival rates were similar to implants placed in native bone.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
