普通医生和专科医生对安乐死的看法。法国关于对姑息治疗的态度和做法的调查结果[2002]。

Annales de medecine interne Pub Date : 2003-11-01
Marc K Ben Diane, Patrick Peretti-Watel, Jean-Marc Lapiana, Roger Favre, Anne Galinier, Hervé Pegliasco, Yolande Obadia
{"title":"普通医生和专科医生对安乐死的看法。法国关于对姑息治疗的态度和做法的调查结果[2002]。","authors":"Marc K Ben Diane,&nbsp;Patrick Peretti-Watel,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Lapiana,&nbsp;Roger Favre,&nbsp;Anne Galinier,&nbsp;Hervé Pegliasco,&nbsp;Yolande Obadia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate opinion of physicians about the legalization of euthanasia according to their professional characteristics, their attitudes toward morphine, their attitudes toward communication with end-of-life patients, and their perception of specific types of terminal care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out from data collected among 1.000 general practitioners, oncologists, neurologists and HIV specialists (French cross-sectional survey on palliative care, 2002).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>42.5% of physicians agreed with the statement that euthanasia should be legalized as it is already the case in the Netherlands. Inadequate prescription of morphine and calling terminal sedation as active euthanasia were associated with a favorable opinion toward legalization of euthanasia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Specific training on pain management and terminal sedation would help physicians to have a better view of the problem of euthanasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":75505,"journal":{"name":"Annales de medecine interne","volume":"154 7","pages":"441-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Opinion of general and specialized physicians toward euthanasia. Results from the French survey on attitudes and practices against palliative care, 2002].\",\"authors\":\"Marc K Ben Diane,&nbsp;Patrick Peretti-Watel,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Lapiana,&nbsp;Roger Favre,&nbsp;Anne Galinier,&nbsp;Hervé Pegliasco,&nbsp;Yolande Obadia\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate opinion of physicians about the legalization of euthanasia according to their professional characteristics, their attitudes toward morphine, their attitudes toward communication with end-of-life patients, and their perception of specific types of terminal care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out from data collected among 1.000 general practitioners, oncologists, neurologists and HIV specialists (French cross-sectional survey on palliative care, 2002).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>42.5% of physicians agreed with the statement that euthanasia should be legalized as it is already the case in the Netherlands. Inadequate prescription of morphine and calling terminal sedation as active euthanasia were associated with a favorable opinion toward legalization of euthanasia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Specific training on pain management and terminal sedation would help physicians to have a better view of the problem of euthanasia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de medecine interne\",\"volume\":\"154 7\",\"pages\":\"441-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de medecine interne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de medecine interne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从医师的职业特点、对吗啡的态度、对与临终病人沟通的态度、对特定类型临终护理的认识等方面,评价医师对安乐死合法化的看法。方法:对1000名全科医生、肿瘤科医生、神经科医生和艾滋病毒专家进行单因素和多因素分析(2002年法国姑息治疗横断面调查)。结果:42.5%的医生同意安乐死应该合法化的说法,因为荷兰已经这样做了。不适当的吗啡处方和将晚期镇静称为主动安乐死与赞成安乐死合法化的意见有关。结论:对疼痛管理和临终镇静进行针对性的培训有助于医生更好地认识安乐死问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Opinion of general and specialized physicians toward euthanasia. Results from the French survey on attitudes and practices against palliative care, 2002].

Objectives: To evaluate opinion of physicians about the legalization of euthanasia according to their professional characteristics, their attitudes toward morphine, their attitudes toward communication with end-of-life patients, and their perception of specific types of terminal care.

Method: Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out from data collected among 1.000 general practitioners, oncologists, neurologists and HIV specialists (French cross-sectional survey on palliative care, 2002).

Results: 42.5% of physicians agreed with the statement that euthanasia should be legalized as it is already the case in the Netherlands. Inadequate prescription of morphine and calling terminal sedation as active euthanasia were associated with a favorable opinion toward legalization of euthanasia.

Conclusion: Specific training on pain management and terminal sedation would help physicians to have a better view of the problem of euthanasia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信