{"title":"化学发光免疫法与免疫放射法检测血清TSH的临床价值比较。","authors":"Jian-ying Yu, Ying Lin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical value between chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) and immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) in detecting TSH in patients with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TSH levels in serums were detected by CLIA and IRMA in 112 normal persons, 120 hyperthyroidism patients and 58 hypothyroidism patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CLIA was significantly correlated with IRMA (r = 0.98, P < 0.01). CLIA had higher coincidence rate than IRMA in the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, and CLIA was more accurate and repetitive than IRMA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CLIA is more valuable than IRMA in diagnosing both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism.</p>","PeriodicalId":13115,"journal":{"name":"Hunan yi ke da xue xue bao = Hunan yike daxue xuebao = Bulletin of Hunan Medical University","volume":"28 3","pages":"275-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Clinical value comparison between chemiluminescent immunoassay and immunoradiometric assay in detecting TSH in serum].\",\"authors\":\"Jian-ying Yu, Ying Lin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the clinical value between chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) and immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) in detecting TSH in patients with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TSH levels in serums were detected by CLIA and IRMA in 112 normal persons, 120 hyperthyroidism patients and 58 hypothyroidism patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CLIA was significantly correlated with IRMA (r = 0.98, P < 0.01). CLIA had higher coincidence rate than IRMA in the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, and CLIA was more accurate and repetitive than IRMA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CLIA is more valuable than IRMA in diagnosing both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hunan yi ke da xue xue bao = Hunan yike daxue xuebao = Bulletin of Hunan Medical University\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"275-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hunan yi ke da xue xue bao = Hunan yike daxue xuebao = Bulletin of Hunan Medical University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hunan yi ke da xue xue bao = Hunan yike daxue xuebao = Bulletin of Hunan Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较化学发光免疫法(CLIA)与免疫放射法(IRMA)检测甲亢、甲减患者TSH的临床价值。方法:对112例正常人、120例甲亢患者和58例甲减患者的血清TSH水平进行了CLIA和IRMA检测。结果:CLIA与IRMA有显著相关性(r = 0.98, P < 0.01)。CLIA诊断甲状腺功能亢进和甲状腺功能减退的符合率高于IRMA,且CLIA的准确性和重复性高于IRMA。结论:CLIA对甲状腺功能亢进和甲状腺功能减退的诊断价值高于IRMA。
[Clinical value comparison between chemiluminescent immunoassay and immunoradiometric assay in detecting TSH in serum].
Objective: To compare the clinical value between chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) and immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) in detecting TSH in patients with hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism.
Methods: The TSH levels in serums were detected by CLIA and IRMA in 112 normal persons, 120 hyperthyroidism patients and 58 hypothyroidism patients.
Results: CLIA was significantly correlated with IRMA (r = 0.98, P < 0.01). CLIA had higher coincidence rate than IRMA in the diagnosis of hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, and CLIA was more accurate and repetitive than IRMA.
Conclusion: CLIA is more valuable than IRMA in diagnosing both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism.