改进的跑步机方案评估儿童年龄组的体能——与Bruce和Balke方案的比较。

B Marinov, S Kostianev, T Turnovska
{"title":"改进的跑步机方案评估儿童年龄组的体能——与Bruce和Balke方案的比较。","authors":"B Marinov,&nbsp;S Kostianev,&nbsp;T Turnovska","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare classical Balke and Bruce protocols with our modification of Balke protocol in pediatric cardiorespiratory diagnostics. The modification of Balke consists of nine stages per 1 min at a constant velocity of 5.6 km x h(-1) and increasing elevation from 6% to 22% in 2% increments. Sixty healthy children (mean age = 13.3+/-0.2 years; BMI = 18.8+/-0.6 kg x m(-2); mean +/- 95% CI), divided into three groups of 20 children each, matched by age, height and BMI performed integrative cardiopulmonary exercise testing using one of the treadmill protocols mentioned. At the end of each exercise increment and throughout the recovery period the children were asked to rate the perceived exertion (RPE) using the Borg Category Ratio scale--CR-10. Exercise results showed that Balke protocol had the longest duration (21.7+/-0.6 min.) and the lowest values for VO2/kg (34.2+/-1.8 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)) due to the minimal workload increments. Bruce protocol had intermediate duration (14.9+/-1.1 min.) and children achieved the highest VO2/kg (48.6+/-2.7 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)) but the test is symptom-limited which is ethically unacceptable in childhood. Exercise data revealed that our modification of the classical Balke protocol had an optimal duration (11 min.) and yielded peak VO2/kg values (39.4+/-2.3 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)) adequate for evaluation of children's exercise capacity. Children's ratings of perceived exertion were highest in Bruce protocol (6.5+/-0.4) and lowest in the original Balke protocol (4.5+/-0.8). In conclusion, the modification of Balke protocol is suitable and reliable for screening and clinical testing in pediatric age group.</p>","PeriodicalId":7035,"journal":{"name":"Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Bulgarica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified treadmill protocol for evaluation of physical fitness in pediatric age group--comparison with Bruce and Balke protocols.\",\"authors\":\"B Marinov,&nbsp;S Kostianev,&nbsp;T Turnovska\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare classical Balke and Bruce protocols with our modification of Balke protocol in pediatric cardiorespiratory diagnostics. The modification of Balke consists of nine stages per 1 min at a constant velocity of 5.6 km x h(-1) and increasing elevation from 6% to 22% in 2% increments. Sixty healthy children (mean age = 13.3+/-0.2 years; BMI = 18.8+/-0.6 kg x m(-2); mean +/- 95% CI), divided into three groups of 20 children each, matched by age, height and BMI performed integrative cardiopulmonary exercise testing using one of the treadmill protocols mentioned. At the end of each exercise increment and throughout the recovery period the children were asked to rate the perceived exertion (RPE) using the Borg Category Ratio scale--CR-10. Exercise results showed that Balke protocol had the longest duration (21.7+/-0.6 min.) and the lowest values for VO2/kg (34.2+/-1.8 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)) due to the minimal workload increments. Bruce protocol had intermediate duration (14.9+/-1.1 min.) and children achieved the highest VO2/kg (48.6+/-2.7 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)) but the test is symptom-limited which is ethically unacceptable in childhood. Exercise data revealed that our modification of the classical Balke protocol had an optimal duration (11 min.) and yielded peak VO2/kg values (39.4+/-2.3 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)) adequate for evaluation of children's exercise capacity. Children's ratings of perceived exertion were highest in Bruce protocol (6.5+/-0.4) and lowest in the original Balke protocol (4.5+/-0.8). In conclusion, the modification of Balke protocol is suitable and reliable for screening and clinical testing in pediatric age group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Bulgarica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Bulgarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Bulgarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较经典的Balke和Bruce方案与我们修改的Balke方案在儿科心肺诊断中的应用。Balke的改进包括每1分钟以5.6 km x h(-1)的恒定速度进行9个阶段,并以2%的增量将海拔从6%增加到22%。60名健康儿童(平均年龄= 13.3±0.2岁;BMI = 18.8+/-0.6 kg × m(-2);平均+/- 95% CI),分为三组,每组20名儿童,根据年龄、身高和BMI进行匹配,使用上述一种跑步机方案进行综合心肺运动测试。在每个运动增量结束时和整个恢复期,要求儿童使用博格分类比率量表(CR-10)对感知运动(RPE)进行评分。运动结果显示,由于工作量增量最小,Balke方案持续时间最长(21.7+/-0.6 min), VO2/kg值最低(34.2+/-1.8 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1))。布鲁斯方案的持续时间中等(14.9+/-1.1分钟),儿童达到最高的VO2/kg (48.6+/-2.7 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)),但该试验是症状有限的,这在儿童时期在伦理上是不可接受的。运动数据显示,我们对经典Balke方案的修改具有最佳持续时间(11分钟),并产生峰值VO2/kg值(39.4+/-2.3 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)),足以评估儿童的运动能力。布鲁斯方案中儿童感知运动强度评分最高(6.5+/-0.4),原始Balke方案中儿童感知运动强度评分最低(4.5+/-0.8)。综上所述,Balke方案的修改适用于儿童年龄组的筛查和临床检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modified treadmill protocol for evaluation of physical fitness in pediatric age group--comparison with Bruce and Balke protocols.

The aim of this study was to compare classical Balke and Bruce protocols with our modification of Balke protocol in pediatric cardiorespiratory diagnostics. The modification of Balke consists of nine stages per 1 min at a constant velocity of 5.6 km x h(-1) and increasing elevation from 6% to 22% in 2% increments. Sixty healthy children (mean age = 13.3+/-0.2 years; BMI = 18.8+/-0.6 kg x m(-2); mean +/- 95% CI), divided into three groups of 20 children each, matched by age, height and BMI performed integrative cardiopulmonary exercise testing using one of the treadmill protocols mentioned. At the end of each exercise increment and throughout the recovery period the children were asked to rate the perceived exertion (RPE) using the Borg Category Ratio scale--CR-10. Exercise results showed that Balke protocol had the longest duration (21.7+/-0.6 min.) and the lowest values for VO2/kg (34.2+/-1.8 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)) due to the minimal workload increments. Bruce protocol had intermediate duration (14.9+/-1.1 min.) and children achieved the highest VO2/kg (48.6+/-2.7 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)) but the test is symptom-limited which is ethically unacceptable in childhood. Exercise data revealed that our modification of the classical Balke protocol had an optimal duration (11 min.) and yielded peak VO2/kg values (39.4+/-2.3 ml x min(-1) x kg(-1)) adequate for evaluation of children's exercise capacity. Children's ratings of perceived exertion were highest in Bruce protocol (6.5+/-0.4) and lowest in the original Balke protocol (4.5+/-0.8). In conclusion, the modification of Balke protocol is suitable and reliable for screening and clinical testing in pediatric age group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信