园艺作物线虫的生物系统管理策略:熏蒸、混淆或忽略它们。

Richard A Sikora
{"title":"园艺作物线虫的生物系统管理策略:熏蒸、混淆或忽略它们。","authors":"Richard A Sikora","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrated management of nematodes as well as other soil-borne pests and diseases in horticultural crops in the tropics and subtropics as well as in protected cultivation in temperate climates is often a lopsided approach based on soil fumigation. With the upcoming loss of methyl bromide (Mbr), because of its effects on the ozone layer of the atmosphere, growers will have to make changes in the way they look at the problem of controlling soil-borne nematodes, fungi, insects and weeds. They can no longer rely on eradication of all pest problems with a one-stroke fumigation process. This is a severe problem that requires sound scientific solutions. New control technologies need to be developed and established methods urgently refined that are acceptable to the growers. Alternative fumigants and systemic nematicides still on the market will not provide broad spectrum control equal to Mbr. More disturbing is a provocative statement made by an economist that due to pesticides nematologists have neglected developing suitable alternative IPM measures of control. Some people may agree with this statement, especially if they are not involved in soil-ecosystem research. If you are a nematologist, this thought-provoking statement is at first upsetting but it is not valid. My talk will concentrate on the biological and cultural control methodologies that have been developed by nematologist around the world for use in management systems. These are technologies that can compensate for the loss of methyl bromide to horticultural crops in many countries. Alternatives are available and new methodologies are being developed for restructuring IPM strategies in many crops. The compatibility of these new approaches with general farming practices needs to be assessed on a country by country basis. Mutually interacting technology packages are needed, that are logically structured in \"biological system management\" programs that stress biocontrol aspects of control and not pesticides as is often the case in standard IPM approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":85134,"journal":{"name":"Mededelingen (Rijksuniversiteit te Gent. Fakulteit van de Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen)","volume":"67 2","pages":"5-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategies for biological system management of nematodes in horticultural crops: fumigate, confuse or ignore them.\",\"authors\":\"Richard A Sikora\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Integrated management of nematodes as well as other soil-borne pests and diseases in horticultural crops in the tropics and subtropics as well as in protected cultivation in temperate climates is often a lopsided approach based on soil fumigation. With the upcoming loss of methyl bromide (Mbr), because of its effects on the ozone layer of the atmosphere, growers will have to make changes in the way they look at the problem of controlling soil-borne nematodes, fungi, insects and weeds. They can no longer rely on eradication of all pest problems with a one-stroke fumigation process. This is a severe problem that requires sound scientific solutions. New control technologies need to be developed and established methods urgently refined that are acceptable to the growers. Alternative fumigants and systemic nematicides still on the market will not provide broad spectrum control equal to Mbr. More disturbing is a provocative statement made by an economist that due to pesticides nematologists have neglected developing suitable alternative IPM measures of control. Some people may agree with this statement, especially if they are not involved in soil-ecosystem research. If you are a nematologist, this thought-provoking statement is at first upsetting but it is not valid. My talk will concentrate on the biological and cultural control methodologies that have been developed by nematologist around the world for use in management systems. These are technologies that can compensate for the loss of methyl bromide to horticultural crops in many countries. Alternatives are available and new methodologies are being developed for restructuring IPM strategies in many crops. The compatibility of these new approaches with general farming practices needs to be assessed on a country by country basis. Mutually interacting technology packages are needed, that are logically structured in \\\"biological system management\\\" programs that stress biocontrol aspects of control and not pesticides as is often the case in standard IPM approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":85134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mededelingen (Rijksuniversiteit te Gent. Fakulteit van de Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen)\",\"volume\":\"67 2\",\"pages\":\"5-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mededelingen (Rijksuniversiteit te Gent. Fakulteit van de Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mededelingen (Rijksuniversiteit te Gent. Fakulteit van de Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在热带和亚热带的园艺作物以及温带气候的保护性耕作中,线虫和其他土传病虫害的综合管理往往是一种以土壤熏蒸为基础的不平衡方法。随着甲基溴(Mbr)即将消失,由于它对大气臭氧层的影响,种植者将不得不改变他们对控制土壤传播的线虫、真菌、昆虫和杂草问题的看法。他们不能再依靠一次熏蒸消除所有害虫问题。这是一个严重的问题,需要可靠的科学解决方案。需要开发新的控制技术,并迫切改进种植者可接受的现有方法。市面上的替代熏蒸剂和系统杀线虫剂不能提供与Mbr相同的广谱控制。更令人不安的是,一位经济学家发表了一份挑衅性的声明,称由于杀虫剂的存在,线虫学家忽视了开发合适的替代IPM控制措施。有些人可能会同意这种说法,特别是如果他们没有参与土壤生态系统的研究。如果你是一名线虫学家,这种发人深省的说法一开始会让人心烦意乱,但它是无效的。我的演讲将集中在由世界各地的线虫学家开发的用于管理系统的生物和文化控制方法。在许多国家,这些技术可以弥补甲基溴对园艺作物的损失。目前已有替代方案,并且正在开发新的方法,以重新调整许多作物的IPM战略。这些新方法与一般农业做法的兼容性需要逐个国家进行评估。需要相互作用的技术包,这些技术包在“生物系统管理”程序中具有逻辑结构,强调控制的生物控制方面,而不是标准IPM方法中经常出现的农药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategies for biological system management of nematodes in horticultural crops: fumigate, confuse or ignore them.

Integrated management of nematodes as well as other soil-borne pests and diseases in horticultural crops in the tropics and subtropics as well as in protected cultivation in temperate climates is often a lopsided approach based on soil fumigation. With the upcoming loss of methyl bromide (Mbr), because of its effects on the ozone layer of the atmosphere, growers will have to make changes in the way they look at the problem of controlling soil-borne nematodes, fungi, insects and weeds. They can no longer rely on eradication of all pest problems with a one-stroke fumigation process. This is a severe problem that requires sound scientific solutions. New control technologies need to be developed and established methods urgently refined that are acceptable to the growers. Alternative fumigants and systemic nematicides still on the market will not provide broad spectrum control equal to Mbr. More disturbing is a provocative statement made by an economist that due to pesticides nematologists have neglected developing suitable alternative IPM measures of control. Some people may agree with this statement, especially if they are not involved in soil-ecosystem research. If you are a nematologist, this thought-provoking statement is at first upsetting but it is not valid. My talk will concentrate on the biological and cultural control methodologies that have been developed by nematologist around the world for use in management systems. These are technologies that can compensate for the loss of methyl bromide to horticultural crops in many countries. Alternatives are available and new methodologies are being developed for restructuring IPM strategies in many crops. The compatibility of these new approaches with general farming practices needs to be assessed on a country by country basis. Mutually interacting technology packages are needed, that are logically structured in "biological system management" programs that stress biocontrol aspects of control and not pesticides as is often the case in standard IPM approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信