{"title":"[结核病筛查:公众辩论的场合?]","authors":"M Dijkstra, F J Meijman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article focuses on the public debate in the mid-twentieth century concerning government-directed screening on tuberculosis as reflected in newspapers and medical literature. According to communication theory, media show a variety of functions within the process of democratic political decision-making. This study points out that all national Dutch newspapers, in contradiction to the theory underlined the ideology of screening without any critical contribution. The debate within the medical profession shows a defence of positions in a 'pillarized' society rather than a more ethical discussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":81331,"journal":{"name":"Gewina","volume":"25 4","pages":"241-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Screening on tuberculosis: an occasion for public debate?].\",\"authors\":\"M Dijkstra, F J Meijman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article focuses on the public debate in the mid-twentieth century concerning government-directed screening on tuberculosis as reflected in newspapers and medical literature. According to communication theory, media show a variety of functions within the process of democratic political decision-making. This study points out that all national Dutch newspapers, in contradiction to the theory underlined the ideology of screening without any critical contribution. The debate within the medical profession shows a defence of positions in a 'pillarized' society rather than a more ethical discussion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gewina\",\"volume\":\"25 4\",\"pages\":\"241-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gewina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gewina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Screening on tuberculosis: an occasion for public debate?].
This article focuses on the public debate in the mid-twentieth century concerning government-directed screening on tuberculosis as reflected in newspapers and medical literature. According to communication theory, media show a variety of functions within the process of democratic political decision-making. This study points out that all national Dutch newspapers, in contradiction to the theory underlined the ideology of screening without any critical contribution. The debate within the medical profession shows a defence of positions in a 'pillarized' society rather than a more ethical discussion.