以医院为基础的上消化道肿瘤病例对照研究中对照选择偏倚的评估

Ines N Nishimoto, Javier Pintos, Nicolas F Schlecht, Humberto Torloni, André L Carvalho, Luiz P Kowalski, Eduardo L Franco
{"title":"以医院为基础的上消化道肿瘤病例对照研究中对照选择偏倚的评估","authors":"Ines N Nishimoto,&nbsp;Javier Pintos,&nbsp;Nicolas F Schlecht,&nbsp;Humberto Torloni,&nbsp;André L Carvalho,&nbsp;Luiz P Kowalski,&nbsp;Eduardo L Franco","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most of the evidence identifying determinants of UADT cancer risk comes from hospital-based case-control studies. However, such studies are thought to be influenced by selection bias given the extent of association of tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking with other diseases in the general population. We assessed the extent of selection bias due to inclusion of controls with tobacco or alcohol related diseases in a hospital-based case-control study of upper aero-digestive tract (UADT) cancers in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Risk factor information was obtained from 784 cases and 1568 non-cancer controls. Causes of hospitalization for controls were scored according to their likelihood of association with tobacco and alcohol. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by conditional logistic regression with and without exclusion of controls with tobacco or alcohol related diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OR for smoking slightly increased after exclusion of controls with tobacco-related diseases, from 15.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7, 24.2) among heaviest smokers (pack-years > 91) to 18.6 (95%CI: 11.4, 30.2). The OR for alcohol consumption remained unchanged after exclusion of controls with alcohol related diseases. Associations of low magnitude for some dietary variables (citric fruits, carotene-rich foods, spicy foods, maté tea) and wood stove use were not appreciably affected by the exclusion of controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bias introduced by controls with tobacco and alcohol related diseases is small, when these exposures are investigated as determinants, and almost negligible when considered as confounders of the association between other factors and UADT cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":84981,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer epidemiology and prevention","volume":"7 3","pages":"131-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of control selection bias in a hospital-based case-control study of upper aero-digestive tract cancers.\",\"authors\":\"Ines N Nishimoto,&nbsp;Javier Pintos,&nbsp;Nicolas F Schlecht,&nbsp;Humberto Torloni,&nbsp;André L Carvalho,&nbsp;Luiz P Kowalski,&nbsp;Eduardo L Franco\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most of the evidence identifying determinants of UADT cancer risk comes from hospital-based case-control studies. However, such studies are thought to be influenced by selection bias given the extent of association of tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking with other diseases in the general population. We assessed the extent of selection bias due to inclusion of controls with tobacco or alcohol related diseases in a hospital-based case-control study of upper aero-digestive tract (UADT) cancers in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Risk factor information was obtained from 784 cases and 1568 non-cancer controls. Causes of hospitalization for controls were scored according to their likelihood of association with tobacco and alcohol. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by conditional logistic regression with and without exclusion of controls with tobacco or alcohol related diseases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The OR for smoking slightly increased after exclusion of controls with tobacco-related diseases, from 15.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7, 24.2) among heaviest smokers (pack-years > 91) to 18.6 (95%CI: 11.4, 30.2). The OR for alcohol consumption remained unchanged after exclusion of controls with alcohol related diseases. Associations of low magnitude for some dietary variables (citric fruits, carotene-rich foods, spicy foods, maté tea) and wood stove use were not appreciably affected by the exclusion of controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bias introduced by controls with tobacco and alcohol related diseases is small, when these exposures are investigated as determinants, and almost negligible when considered as confounders of the association between other factors and UADT cancers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":84981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cancer epidemiology and prevention\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"131-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cancer epidemiology and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer epidemiology and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数确定UADT癌症风险决定因素的证据来自基于医院的病例对照研究。然而,鉴于吸烟和饮酒与一般人群中其他疾病的关联程度,这些研究被认为受到选择偏差的影响。我们在巴西的一项基于医院的上呼吸道-消化道(UADT)癌症病例对照研究中评估了因纳入烟草或酒精相关疾病的对照而导致的选择偏倚程度。方法:收集784例患者和1568例非肿瘤对照者的危险因素信息。对照组的住院原因根据其与烟草和酒精相关的可能性进行评分。通过条件logistic回归计算优势比(OR),排除或不排除与烟草或酒精相关疾病的对照。结果:在排除有烟草相关疾病的对照者后,吸烟的OR略有增加,从重度吸烟者(包年> 91)的15.3(95%置信区间[CI]: 9.7, 24.2)到18.6 (95%CI: 11.4, 30.2)。在排除酒精相关疾病的对照组后,饮酒的OR保持不变。排除对照组后,一些饮食变量(柑橘类水果、富含胡萝卜素的食物、辛辣食物、mat茶)和柴炉使用的低强度关联没有明显影响。结论:当将烟酒相关疾病作为决定因素进行调查时,烟酒相关疾病的对照所带来的偏倚很小,当将其作为其他因素与UADT癌症之间关联的混杂因素进行调查时,偏倚几乎可以忽略不计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of control selection bias in a hospital-based case-control study of upper aero-digestive tract cancers.

Background: Most of the evidence identifying determinants of UADT cancer risk comes from hospital-based case-control studies. However, such studies are thought to be influenced by selection bias given the extent of association of tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking with other diseases in the general population. We assessed the extent of selection bias due to inclusion of controls with tobacco or alcohol related diseases in a hospital-based case-control study of upper aero-digestive tract (UADT) cancers in Brazil.

Methods: Risk factor information was obtained from 784 cases and 1568 non-cancer controls. Causes of hospitalization for controls were scored according to their likelihood of association with tobacco and alcohol. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated by conditional logistic regression with and without exclusion of controls with tobacco or alcohol related diseases.

Results: The OR for smoking slightly increased after exclusion of controls with tobacco-related diseases, from 15.3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.7, 24.2) among heaviest smokers (pack-years > 91) to 18.6 (95%CI: 11.4, 30.2). The OR for alcohol consumption remained unchanged after exclusion of controls with alcohol related diseases. Associations of low magnitude for some dietary variables (citric fruits, carotene-rich foods, spicy foods, maté tea) and wood stove use were not appreciably affected by the exclusion of controls.

Conclusion: The bias introduced by controls with tobacco and alcohol related diseases is small, when these exposures are investigated as determinants, and almost negligible when considered as confounders of the association between other factors and UADT cancers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信