{"title":"日本针叶林流域年森林蒸散估算(2):涡动相关方差、水分收支和流流加截留损失的比较","authors":"Takanori Shimizu , Tomo’omi Kumagai , Masahiro Kobayashi , Koji Tamai , Shin’ichi Iida , Naoki Kabeya , Reo Ikawa , Makiko Tateishi , Yoshiyuki Miyazawa , Akira Shimizu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Evapotranspiration (ET) was estimated from a planted coniferous forest in southwestern Japan by applying three methods: the eddy covariance method; the measurement of rainfall (<em>P</em>) and runoff (<em>Q</em>) in a small watershed; and a combination of rainfall interception loss (<em>I<sub>C</sub></em>), upper canopy transpiration based on a sap-flux density measurement in Japanese cedar (<em>Cryptomeria Japonica</em> D. Don) stands (<em>E</em><sub>UC</sub>), and modeled sub-canopy ET (<em>E</em><sub>SC</sub>). After inverse multiplication of the energy imbalance ratio, ET by the eddy covariance method (ET<sub>EC</sub>) was 839.9<!--> <!-->mm in 2007 and 811.8<!--> <!-->mm in 2008. The yearly values of <em>P</em>–<em>Q</em> were partially affected by <em>P</em> in the previous autumn. After continuous data collection for more than 5<!--> <!-->years, <em>P</em>–<em>Q</em> became stable. The 9-year (2000–2008) average <em>P</em>–<em>Q</em>, which was considered most reliable in this study, was 897.5<!--> <!-->mm<!--> <!-->y<sup>−1</sup>. The cumulative ET<sub>EC</sub> during the daylight hours from the right stream bank, covered mainly with large Japanese cedars, was 894.1<!--> <!-->mm from April 2007 to March 2008. The value was almost the same as that calculated as the components sum (ET<sub>COMP</sub> <!-->=<!--> <em>I<sub>C</sub></em> <!-->+<!--> <em>E</em><sub>UC</sub> <!-->+<!--> <em>E</em><sub>SC</sub>: 911.4<!--> <!-->mm), and the comparison suggested that the annual totals of ET<sub>EC</sub> with an energy imbalance correction provide a reliable estimate of ET in a forest stand on a complex topography. Spatial variation in the watershed was likely caused by differences in soil water retention at each slope position. The slight difference in annual ET<sub>EC</sub> in 2007 compared with 2008 was attributed to differences in the radiative energy input. In the monthly–weekly analysis, ET<sub>COMP</sub> was frequently higher than ET<sub>EC</sub> after heavy rainfall, while ET<sub>EC</sub> was higher under dry conditions and during active ET. Even under dry canopy conditions, daily ET<sub>EC</sub> was often higher than <em>E</em><sub>UC</sub> <!-->+<!--> <em>E</em><sub>SC</sub>. The results suggested a time-lag in evaporation from the ecosystem and/or under-estimated ET<sub>EC</sub> after rainfall.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"522 ","pages":"Pages 250-264"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.021","citationCount":"43","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of annual forest evapotranspiration from a coniferous plantation watershed in Japan (2): Comparison of eddy covariance, water budget and sap-flow plus interception loss\",\"authors\":\"Takanori Shimizu , Tomo’omi Kumagai , Masahiro Kobayashi , Koji Tamai , Shin’ichi Iida , Naoki Kabeya , Reo Ikawa , Makiko Tateishi , Yoshiyuki Miyazawa , Akira Shimizu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Evapotranspiration (ET) was estimated from a planted coniferous forest in southwestern Japan by applying three methods: the eddy covariance method; the measurement of rainfall (<em>P</em>) and runoff (<em>Q</em>) in a small watershed; and a combination of rainfall interception loss (<em>I<sub>C</sub></em>), upper canopy transpiration based on a sap-flux density measurement in Japanese cedar (<em>Cryptomeria Japonica</em> D. Don) stands (<em>E</em><sub>UC</sub>), and modeled sub-canopy ET (<em>E</em><sub>SC</sub>). After inverse multiplication of the energy imbalance ratio, ET by the eddy covariance method (ET<sub>EC</sub>) was 839.9<!--> <!-->mm in 2007 and 811.8<!--> <!-->mm in 2008. The yearly values of <em>P</em>–<em>Q</em> were partially affected by <em>P</em> in the previous autumn. After continuous data collection for more than 5<!--> <!-->years, <em>P</em>–<em>Q</em> became stable. The 9-year (2000–2008) average <em>P</em>–<em>Q</em>, which was considered most reliable in this study, was 897.5<!--> <!-->mm<!--> <!-->y<sup>−1</sup>. The cumulative ET<sub>EC</sub> during the daylight hours from the right stream bank, covered mainly with large Japanese cedars, was 894.1<!--> <!-->mm from April 2007 to March 2008. The value was almost the same as that calculated as the components sum (ET<sub>COMP</sub> <!-->=<!--> <em>I<sub>C</sub></em> <!-->+<!--> <em>E</em><sub>UC</sub> <!-->+<!--> <em>E</em><sub>SC</sub>: 911.4<!--> <!-->mm), and the comparison suggested that the annual totals of ET<sub>EC</sub> with an energy imbalance correction provide a reliable estimate of ET in a forest stand on a complex topography. Spatial variation in the watershed was likely caused by differences in soil water retention at each slope position. The slight difference in annual ET<sub>EC</sub> in 2007 compared with 2008 was attributed to differences in the radiative energy input. In the monthly–weekly analysis, ET<sub>COMP</sub> was frequently higher than ET<sub>EC</sub> after heavy rainfall, while ET<sub>EC</sub> was higher under dry conditions and during active ET. Even under dry canopy conditions, daily ET<sub>EC</sub> was often higher than <em>E</em><sub>UC</sub> <!-->+<!--> <em>E</em><sub>SC</sub>. The results suggested a time-lag in evaporation from the ecosystem and/or under-estimated ET<sub>EC</sub> after rainfall.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"volume\":\"522 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 250-264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.12.021\",\"citationCount\":\"43\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hydrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169414010324\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169414010324","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43
摘要
应用三种方法估算了日本西南部针叶林的蒸散量:涡动相关方差法;小流域雨量(P)和径流(Q)的测量;结合降雨截流损失(IC)、杉木(Cryptomeria Japonica D. Don)林分(EUC)基于水分通量密度测量的上冠蒸腾和模拟的亚冠ET (ESC)。能量不平衡比反乘后,涡旋相关方差法(ETEC)的蒸散发在2007年为839.9 mm, 2008年为811.8 mm。前一秋季P - q年值部分受P影响。经过5年多的连续数据采集,P-Q趋于稳定。本研究认为最可靠的9年(2000-2008)平均P-Q为897.5 mm y - 1。2007年4月至2008年3月,以大杉木覆盖的右岸白天累积ETEC为894.1 mm。ETCOMP = IC + EUC + ESC: 911.4 mm,与ETCOMP = IC + EUC + ESC: 911.4 mm的计算值基本一致,表明经能量不平衡校正后的ETEC年际总量可以较为可靠地估算复杂地形林分的ET。流域的空间差异可能是由于各坡位土壤持水量的差异造成的。与2008年相比,2007年ETEC的微小差异归因于辐射能量输入的差异。在月-周分析中,ETCOMP在强降雨后往往高于ETEC,而ETEC在干旱条件和活跃ET条件下高于ETEC,即使在干旱冠层条件下,日ETEC也往往高于EUC + ESC。结果表明,降雨后生态系统蒸发和/或低估了ETEC存在时滞。
Estimation of annual forest evapotranspiration from a coniferous plantation watershed in Japan (2): Comparison of eddy covariance, water budget and sap-flow plus interception loss
Evapotranspiration (ET) was estimated from a planted coniferous forest in southwestern Japan by applying three methods: the eddy covariance method; the measurement of rainfall (P) and runoff (Q) in a small watershed; and a combination of rainfall interception loss (IC), upper canopy transpiration based on a sap-flux density measurement in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria Japonica D. Don) stands (EUC), and modeled sub-canopy ET (ESC). After inverse multiplication of the energy imbalance ratio, ET by the eddy covariance method (ETEC) was 839.9 mm in 2007 and 811.8 mm in 2008. The yearly values of P–Q were partially affected by P in the previous autumn. After continuous data collection for more than 5 years, P–Q became stable. The 9-year (2000–2008) average P–Q, which was considered most reliable in this study, was 897.5 mm y−1. The cumulative ETEC during the daylight hours from the right stream bank, covered mainly with large Japanese cedars, was 894.1 mm from April 2007 to March 2008. The value was almost the same as that calculated as the components sum (ETCOMP = IC + EUC + ESC: 911.4 mm), and the comparison suggested that the annual totals of ETEC with an energy imbalance correction provide a reliable estimate of ET in a forest stand on a complex topography. Spatial variation in the watershed was likely caused by differences in soil water retention at each slope position. The slight difference in annual ETEC in 2007 compared with 2008 was attributed to differences in the radiative energy input. In the monthly–weekly analysis, ETCOMP was frequently higher than ETEC after heavy rainfall, while ETEC was higher under dry conditions and during active ET. Even under dry canopy conditions, daily ETEC was often higher than EUC + ESC. The results suggested a time-lag in evaporation from the ecosystem and/or under-estimated ETEC after rainfall.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.