轻度饮酒条件下交通事故风险感知与驾驶决策——双盲实验研究

Ulrich Frick , Jürgen Rehm , Anette Knoll , Margarete Reifinger , Jörg Hasford
{"title":"轻度饮酒条件下交通事故风险感知与驾驶决策——双盲实验研究","authors":"Ulrich Frick ,&nbsp;Jürgen Rehm ,&nbsp;Anette Knoll ,&nbsp;Margarete Reifinger ,&nbsp;Jörg Hasford","doi":"10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00024-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Purpose:</em> Public traffic safety campaigns in Germany have focussed on the changing risk perception of young drivers. While there is some consensus that perceptions of risk affect driving, less is understood about the relationship and interaction of alcohol consumption and risk perception on the decision to drive. We examined the influence of light alcohol consumption on risk perception and decision to drive, and the interaction of alcohol consumption and cognitive feedback on the handicapping effect of alcohol on risk perception and decision to drive.</p><p><em>Method:</em> In a double-blind block-randomized experimental study of 104 young drivers between 19 and 24 years of age, with two experimentally manipulated independent factors of alcohol consumption (three levels: 0% BAC, 0.015% BAC, 0.03% BAC) and feedback (positive or negative), we assessed three dependent variables: perception of traffic accident risk, subjective judgement about driving-relevant cognitive performance, decision to drive a car. Analyses of variance and covariance were used to analyze differences between levels of experimental factors.</p><p><em>Results:</em> We found that persons with 0.015 BAC performed better than persons in both other alcohol conditions on the standardized risk perception task. Perceived handicap of driving was significantly more pronounced for negative feedback compared to positive feedback with no influence of the level of alcohol consumption. No significant influence on decision to drive was found of either level of alcohol consumption, feedback or sex.</p><p><em>Implications:</em> Decision to drive in young drivers could not be influenced by feedback or light consumption. Public health approaches have to find better determining factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00024-9","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perception of Traffic Accident Risk and Decision to Drive under Light Alcohol Consumption—A Double-Blind Experimental Study\",\"authors\":\"Ulrich Frick ,&nbsp;Jürgen Rehm ,&nbsp;Anette Knoll ,&nbsp;Margarete Reifinger ,&nbsp;Jörg Hasford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00024-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Purpose:</em> Public traffic safety campaigns in Germany have focussed on the changing risk perception of young drivers. While there is some consensus that perceptions of risk affect driving, less is understood about the relationship and interaction of alcohol consumption and risk perception on the decision to drive. We examined the influence of light alcohol consumption on risk perception and decision to drive, and the interaction of alcohol consumption and cognitive feedback on the handicapping effect of alcohol on risk perception and decision to drive.</p><p><em>Method:</em> In a double-blind block-randomized experimental study of 104 young drivers between 19 and 24 years of age, with two experimentally manipulated independent factors of alcohol consumption (three levels: 0% BAC, 0.015% BAC, 0.03% BAC) and feedback (positive or negative), we assessed three dependent variables: perception of traffic accident risk, subjective judgement about driving-relevant cognitive performance, decision to drive a car. Analyses of variance and covariance were used to analyze differences between levels of experimental factors.</p><p><em>Results:</em> We found that persons with 0.015 BAC performed better than persons in both other alcohol conditions on the standardized risk perception task. Perceived handicap of driving was significantly more pronounced for negative feedback compared to positive feedback with no influence of the level of alcohol consumption. No significant influence on decision to drive was found of either level of alcohol consumption, feedback or sex.</p><p><em>Implications:</em> Decision to drive in young drivers could not be influenced by feedback or light consumption. Public health approaches have to find better determining factors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance abuse\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00024-9\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899328900000249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899328900000249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

目的:德国的公共交通安全运动侧重于年轻司机不断变化的风险认知。虽然有一些共识认为风险感知会影响驾驶,但人们对饮酒和风险感知对驾驶决定的关系和相互作用知之甚少。我们研究了轻度饮酒对风险感知和驾驶决策的影响,以及饮酒和认知反馈对酒精对风险感知和驾驶决策的阻碍作用的相互作用。方法:对104名年龄在19 ~ 24岁之间的年轻驾驶员进行双盲区随机实验研究,采用两个实验操纵的独立因素(0% BAC、0.015% BAC、0.03% BAC三个水平)和反馈(正或负),评估交通事故风险感知、驾驶相关认知表现的主观判断、驾驶决策三个因变量。采用方差分析和协方差分析分析各实验因素水平间的差异。结果:我们发现酒精浓度为0.015的人在标准化风险感知任务中的表现优于其他两种酒精条件下的人。在不受饮酒量影响的情况下,消极反馈比积极反馈对驾驶障碍的感知更为明显。没有发现饮酒水平、反馈或性别对驾驶决定有显著影响。结论:年轻司机的驾车决定不受反馈或轻消耗的影响。公共卫生办法必须找到更好的决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perception of Traffic Accident Risk and Decision to Drive under Light Alcohol Consumption—A Double-Blind Experimental Study

Purpose: Public traffic safety campaigns in Germany have focussed on the changing risk perception of young drivers. While there is some consensus that perceptions of risk affect driving, less is understood about the relationship and interaction of alcohol consumption and risk perception on the decision to drive. We examined the influence of light alcohol consumption on risk perception and decision to drive, and the interaction of alcohol consumption and cognitive feedback on the handicapping effect of alcohol on risk perception and decision to drive.

Method: In a double-blind block-randomized experimental study of 104 young drivers between 19 and 24 years of age, with two experimentally manipulated independent factors of alcohol consumption (three levels: 0% BAC, 0.015% BAC, 0.03% BAC) and feedback (positive or negative), we assessed three dependent variables: perception of traffic accident risk, subjective judgement about driving-relevant cognitive performance, decision to drive a car. Analyses of variance and covariance were used to analyze differences between levels of experimental factors.

Results: We found that persons with 0.015 BAC performed better than persons in both other alcohol conditions on the standardized risk perception task. Perceived handicap of driving was significantly more pronounced for negative feedback compared to positive feedback with no influence of the level of alcohol consumption. No significant influence on decision to drive was found of either level of alcohol consumption, feedback or sex.

Implications: Decision to drive in young drivers could not be influenced by feedback or light consumption. Public health approaches have to find better determining factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信