横断面学生药物使用调查中药物报告减少

Michael Fendrich, Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti
{"title":"横断面学生药物使用调查中药物报告减少","authors":"Michael Fendrich,&nbsp;Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti","doi":"10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00018-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Purpose</em><span>. Prior longitudinal cohort studies have suggested that reinterviews about drug use often lead to decreased reports of lifetime substance use (recanting). Respondents may edit their answers on reinterview because of perceptions regarding question threat. Since reinterviews usually occur after long periods of time, the influence of inadequate recall (memory), cannot be ruled out. In order to evaluate the relative importance of editing and memory on recanting, we examined a cross-sectional survey administered in 1993 to a probability sample of Illinois students who were in the 7th through 12th grade. </span><em>Methods</em>. Two sets of self-administered survey questions assessed drug use: the I-SAY drug-use questionnaire, and a supplemental questionnaire asked at the end of the main survey. We compared the rates of “new use” (no use for a drug reported in the I-SAY, use reported for a drug on the supplement) with rates of recanting (use for a drug reported on the I-SAY, no use for a drug reported on the supplement). <em>Results</em>. Recanting was generally more pronounced than new use, especially for cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and inhalants. Those classified as light or inconsistent users on the I-SAY were significantly more likely to recant their drug use reports.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance abuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00018-3","citationCount":"37","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decreased Drug Reporting in a Cross-Sectional Student Drug Use Survey\",\"authors\":\"Michael Fendrich,&nbsp;Mary Ellen Mackesy-Amiti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00018-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Purpose</em><span>. Prior longitudinal cohort studies have suggested that reinterviews about drug use often lead to decreased reports of lifetime substance use (recanting). Respondents may edit their answers on reinterview because of perceptions regarding question threat. Since reinterviews usually occur after long periods of time, the influence of inadequate recall (memory), cannot be ruled out. In order to evaluate the relative importance of editing and memory on recanting, we examined a cross-sectional survey administered in 1993 to a probability sample of Illinois students who were in the 7th through 12th grade. </span><em>Methods</em>. Two sets of self-administered survey questions assessed drug use: the I-SAY drug-use questionnaire, and a supplemental questionnaire asked at the end of the main survey. We compared the rates of “new use” (no use for a drug reported in the I-SAY, use reported for a drug on the supplement) with rates of recanting (use for a drug reported on the I-SAY, no use for a drug reported on the supplement). <em>Results</em>. Recanting was generally more pronounced than new use, especially for cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and inhalants. Those classified as light or inconsistent users on the I-SAY were significantly more likely to recant their drug use reports.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance abuse\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0899-3289(00)00018-3\",\"citationCount\":\"37\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance abuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899328900000183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance abuse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899328900000183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

摘要

目的。先前的纵向队列研究表明,对药物使用的重新访谈通常会导致终生药物使用的报告减少(撤回)。由于对问题威胁的认知,受访者可能会在复访时修改他们的答案。由于重访通常发生在很长一段时间之后,因此不能排除回忆(记忆)不足的影响。为了评估编辑和记忆对撤回的相对重要性,我们检查了1993年对伊利诺伊州7至12年级学生的概率样本进行的横断面调查。方法。两套自我管理的调查问题评估了药物使用情况:I-SAY药物使用问卷,以及在主要调查结束时询问的补充问卷。我们比较了“新用药”的比率(I-SAY报告中没有使用某种药物,补充剂中使用某种药物)和放弃用药的比率(I-SAY报告中使用某种药物,补充剂中没有使用某种药物)。结果。一般来说,放弃毒品比重新使用毒品更为明显,尤其是可卡因、海洛因、大麻和吸入剂。那些在I-SAY中被归类为轻度或不一致使用者的人更有可能撤回他们的药物使用报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decreased Drug Reporting in a Cross-Sectional Student Drug Use Survey

Purpose. Prior longitudinal cohort studies have suggested that reinterviews about drug use often lead to decreased reports of lifetime substance use (recanting). Respondents may edit their answers on reinterview because of perceptions regarding question threat. Since reinterviews usually occur after long periods of time, the influence of inadequate recall (memory), cannot be ruled out. In order to evaluate the relative importance of editing and memory on recanting, we examined a cross-sectional survey administered in 1993 to a probability sample of Illinois students who were in the 7th through 12th grade. Methods. Two sets of self-administered survey questions assessed drug use: the I-SAY drug-use questionnaire, and a supplemental questionnaire asked at the end of the main survey. We compared the rates of “new use” (no use for a drug reported in the I-SAY, use reported for a drug on the supplement) with rates of recanting (use for a drug reported on the I-SAY, no use for a drug reported on the supplement). Results. Recanting was generally more pronounced than new use, especially for cocaine, heroin, marijuana, and inhalants. Those classified as light or inconsistent users on the I-SAY were significantly more likely to recant their drug use reports.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信