提出银屑病关节炎的分类标准。260例患者的初步研究。

Revue du rhumatisme (English ed.) Pub Date : 1999-10-01
B Fournié, L Crognier, C Arnaud, L Zabraniecki, V Lascaux-Lefebvre, V Marc, E Ginesty, V Andrieu, C Dromer, A Fournié
{"title":"提出银屑病关节炎的分类标准。260例患者的初步研究。","authors":"B Fournié,&nbsp;L Crognier,&nbsp;C Arnaud,&nbsp;L Zabraniecki,&nbsp;V Lascaux-Lefebvre,&nbsp;V Marc,&nbsp;E Ginesty,&nbsp;V Andrieu,&nbsp;C Dromer,&nbsp;A Fournié","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Psoriatic arthritis probably owes to its radioclinical presentation its position as the most controversial and poorly understood of all major chronic inflammatory joint diseases. Differentiating psoriatic arthritis from ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis remains difficult.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a statistical analysis aimed at identifying clinical, radiological, and laboratory criteria for classifying psoriatic arthritis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>260 patients were studied retrospectively, including 100 cases with psoriatic arthritis and 160 controls with ankylosing spondylitis meeting Amor's criteria (n = 80) or with rheumatoid arthritis meeting American College of Rheumatology criteria (n = 80). Mean disease duration was five years. Thirty-nine variables were recorded for each patient. Multiple logistic regression and discriminant analysis were used to select the classification criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each of the two statistical methods selected the same nine criteria. After assigning a weighting coefficient to each of these criteria, sensitivity and specificity were better with the multiple logistic regression model (95% and 98%, respectively) than with the discriminant analysis model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our classification criteria require further evaluation in multicenter prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":79371,"journal":{"name":"Revue du rhumatisme (English ed.)","volume":"66 10","pages":"446-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proposed classification criteria of psoriatic arthritis. A preliminary study in 260 patients.\",\"authors\":\"B Fournié,&nbsp;L Crognier,&nbsp;C Arnaud,&nbsp;L Zabraniecki,&nbsp;V Lascaux-Lefebvre,&nbsp;V Marc,&nbsp;E Ginesty,&nbsp;V Andrieu,&nbsp;C Dromer,&nbsp;A Fournié\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>Psoriatic arthritis probably owes to its radioclinical presentation its position as the most controversial and poorly understood of all major chronic inflammatory joint diseases. Differentiating psoriatic arthritis from ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis remains difficult.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a statistical analysis aimed at identifying clinical, radiological, and laboratory criteria for classifying psoriatic arthritis.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>260 patients were studied retrospectively, including 100 cases with psoriatic arthritis and 160 controls with ankylosing spondylitis meeting Amor's criteria (n = 80) or with rheumatoid arthritis meeting American College of Rheumatology criteria (n = 80). Mean disease duration was five years. Thirty-nine variables were recorded for each patient. Multiple logistic regression and discriminant analysis were used to select the classification criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Each of the two statistical methods selected the same nine criteria. After assigning a weighting coefficient to each of these criteria, sensitivity and specificity were better with the multiple logistic regression model (95% and 98%, respectively) than with the discriminant analysis model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our classification criteria require further evaluation in multicenter prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revue du rhumatisme (English ed.)\",\"volume\":\"66 10\",\"pages\":\"446-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revue du rhumatisme (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue du rhumatisme (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

未标记:银屑病关节炎可能是由于其放射临床表现,它是所有主要慢性炎症性关节疾病中最具争议和最不为人所知的。区分银屑病关节炎与强直性脊柱炎和类风湿关节炎仍然很困难。目的:对银屑病关节炎的临床、放射学和实验室分类标准进行统计分析。患者和方法:回顾性研究260例患者,包括100例银屑病关节炎患者和160例符合Amor标准的强直性脊柱炎患者(n = 80)或符合美国风湿病学会标准的类风湿性关节炎患者(n = 80)。平均病程为5年。每位患者记录了39个变量。采用多元逻辑回归和判别分析选择分类标准。结果:两种统计方法均选取了相同的9个标准。在为每个标准分配权重系数后,多元逻辑回归模型的敏感性和特异性均优于判别分析模型(分别为95%和98%)。结论:我们的分类标准需要在多中心前瞻性研究中进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proposed classification criteria of psoriatic arthritis. A preliminary study in 260 patients.

Unlabelled: Psoriatic arthritis probably owes to its radioclinical presentation its position as the most controversial and poorly understood of all major chronic inflammatory joint diseases. Differentiating psoriatic arthritis from ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis remains difficult.

Objective: To conduct a statistical analysis aimed at identifying clinical, radiological, and laboratory criteria for classifying psoriatic arthritis.

Patients and methods: 260 patients were studied retrospectively, including 100 cases with psoriatic arthritis and 160 controls with ankylosing spondylitis meeting Amor's criteria (n = 80) or with rheumatoid arthritis meeting American College of Rheumatology criteria (n = 80). Mean disease duration was five years. Thirty-nine variables were recorded for each patient. Multiple logistic regression and discriminant analysis were used to select the classification criteria.

Results: Each of the two statistical methods selected the same nine criteria. After assigning a weighting coefficient to each of these criteria, sensitivity and specificity were better with the multiple logistic regression model (95% and 98%, respectively) than with the discriminant analysis model.

Conclusion: Our classification criteria require further evaluation in multicenter prospective studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信