GMENAC报告美国医生人力政策:建议和反应

Stephen E. Peterson, Alvin E. Rodin
{"title":"GMENAC报告美国医生人力政策:建议和反应","authors":"Stephen E. Peterson,&nbsp;Alvin E. Rodin","doi":"10.1016/0165-2281(83)90005-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>After four years of study in the United States, the Graduate Medical Education National Advisory Committee (GMENAC) concluded that an excess of approximately 70,000 physicians will exist in 1990. Faced with a future surplus, GMENAC recommends that U.S. medical schools decrease enrollment levels by 10 percent relative to the 1978–79 level and severely restrict entrance of foreign medical graduates. Flaws identified in the GMENAC approach relate to the use of the delphi technique, the future role of nonphysician providers, and a lack of reliable data. The GMENAC report may provide impetus for an abrupt shift from expansionism to reductionism in U.S. physician manpower policy. Long range physician manpower planning has erred in the past, necessitating periodic reevaluation of national policy. A continuing balance between supply and demand, although ideal, can probably never be attained. Thus small adjustments in total supply and specialty mix will always be necessary. The GMENAC report, which is the most comprehensive study of U.S. physician manpower to date, requires serious consideration in this context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79937,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and education","volume":"3 4","pages":"Pages 337-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-2281(83)90005-X","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GMENAC report on U.S. physician manpower policies: Recommendations and reactions\",\"authors\":\"Stephen E. Peterson,&nbsp;Alvin E. Rodin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0165-2281(83)90005-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>After four years of study in the United States, the Graduate Medical Education National Advisory Committee (GMENAC) concluded that an excess of approximately 70,000 physicians will exist in 1990. Faced with a future surplus, GMENAC recommends that U.S. medical schools decrease enrollment levels by 10 percent relative to the 1978–79 level and severely restrict entrance of foreign medical graduates. Flaws identified in the GMENAC approach relate to the use of the delphi technique, the future role of nonphysician providers, and a lack of reliable data. The GMENAC report may provide impetus for an abrupt shift from expansionism to reductionism in U.S. physician manpower policy. Long range physician manpower planning has erred in the past, necessitating periodic reevaluation of national policy. A continuing balance between supply and demand, although ideal, can probably never be attained. Thus small adjustments in total supply and specialty mix will always be necessary. The GMENAC report, which is the most comprehensive study of U.S. physician manpower to date, requires serious consideration in this context.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and education\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 337-349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-2281(83)90005-X\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016522818390005X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016522818390005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

研究生医学教育全国咨询委员会(GMENAC)在美国进行了四年的研究后得出结论,到1990年将有大约70,000名医生过剩。面对未来的盈余,GMENAC建议美国医学院将招生人数相对于1978-79年的水平减少10%,并严格限制外国医学毕业生的入学。GMENAC方法中发现的缺陷与德尔菲技术的使用、非医师提供者的未来角色以及缺乏可靠的数据有关。GMENAC报告可能会为美国医生人力政策从扩张主义到简化主义的突然转变提供动力。长期医生人力规划在过去曾出现过失误,因此需要定期对国家政策进行重新评估。供需之间的持续平衡虽然是理想的,但可能永远无法实现。因此,总供应量和专业组合的小幅调整总是必要的。GMENAC报告是迄今为止对美国医生人力资源最全面的研究,在这方面需要认真考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
GMENAC report on U.S. physician manpower policies: Recommendations and reactions

After four years of study in the United States, the Graduate Medical Education National Advisory Committee (GMENAC) concluded that an excess of approximately 70,000 physicians will exist in 1990. Faced with a future surplus, GMENAC recommends that U.S. medical schools decrease enrollment levels by 10 percent relative to the 1978–79 level and severely restrict entrance of foreign medical graduates. Flaws identified in the GMENAC approach relate to the use of the delphi technique, the future role of nonphysician providers, and a lack of reliable data. The GMENAC report may provide impetus for an abrupt shift from expansionism to reductionism in U.S. physician manpower policy. Long range physician manpower planning has erred in the past, necessitating periodic reevaluation of national policy. A continuing balance between supply and demand, although ideal, can probably never be attained. Thus small adjustments in total supply and specialty mix will always be necessary. The GMENAC report, which is the most comprehensive study of U.S. physician manpower to date, requires serious consideration in this context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信