研究生医学教育经费筹措:最新进展与改革建议

Jack Hadley, Patricia Tigue
{"title":"研究生医学教育经费筹措:最新进展与改革建议","authors":"Jack Hadley,&nbsp;Patricia Tigue","doi":"10.1016/0165-2281(82)90034-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article reports data pertinent to three issues in the financing of graduate medical education: sources of funds for house staff support, the financing of faculty salaries for educational activities, and reimbursement bias in favor of care provided in inpatient settings. Using data from a 1979 hospital survey, we estimate that total expenditures for house-staff stipends and fringe benefits were almost $1.6 billion. Eighty-seven percent of these funds were derived from patient care revenues. Faculty salaries for educational activities added another $376 million to the cost of graduate medical education. Teaching hospitals collected 81 percent of their charges for inpatient care, but only 72.8 percent of charges for outpatient care. However, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursed approximately the same proportion of charges in both settings. The article concludes by arguing that a unified-charge system for paying teaching hospitals would eliminate most of the issues currently associated with the financing of graduate medical education as matters of public policy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79937,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and education","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 157-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-2281(82)90034-0","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financing graduate medical education: An update and a suggestion for reform\",\"authors\":\"Jack Hadley,&nbsp;Patricia Tigue\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0165-2281(82)90034-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This article reports data pertinent to three issues in the financing of graduate medical education: sources of funds for house staff support, the financing of faculty salaries for educational activities, and reimbursement bias in favor of care provided in inpatient settings. Using data from a 1979 hospital survey, we estimate that total expenditures for house-staff stipends and fringe benefits were almost $1.6 billion. Eighty-seven percent of these funds were derived from patient care revenues. Faculty salaries for educational activities added another $376 million to the cost of graduate medical education. Teaching hospitals collected 81 percent of their charges for inpatient care, but only 72.8 percent of charges for outpatient care. However, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursed approximately the same proportion of charges in both settings. The article concludes by arguing that a unified-charge system for paying teaching hospitals would eliminate most of the issues currently associated with the financing of graduate medical education as matters of public policy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and education\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 157-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-2281(82)90034-0\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165228182900340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165228182900340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文报告了与研究生医学教育融资的三个问题相关的数据:住院部工作人员支持的资金来源、教师教育活动工资的融资以及报销偏向于住院患者提供的护理。根据1979年一项医院调查的数据,我们估计住院部员工津贴和附加福利的总支出接近16亿美元。这些资金的87%来自病人护理收入。教师的教育活动薪金使研究生医学教育的费用又增加了3.76亿美元。教学医院收取了81%的住院费用,但只收取了72.8%的门诊费用。然而,在这两种情况下,医疗保险和医疗补助报销的费用比例大致相同。文章的结论是,教学医院的统一收费制度将消除目前与研究生医学教育融资相关的大部分公共政策问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financing graduate medical education: An update and a suggestion for reform

This article reports data pertinent to three issues in the financing of graduate medical education: sources of funds for house staff support, the financing of faculty salaries for educational activities, and reimbursement bias in favor of care provided in inpatient settings. Using data from a 1979 hospital survey, we estimate that total expenditures for house-staff stipends and fringe benefits were almost $1.6 billion. Eighty-seven percent of these funds were derived from patient care revenues. Faculty salaries for educational activities added another $376 million to the cost of graduate medical education. Teaching hospitals collected 81 percent of their charges for inpatient care, but only 72.8 percent of charges for outpatient care. However, Medicare and Medicaid reimbursed approximately the same proportion of charges in both settings. The article concludes by arguing that a unified-charge system for paying teaching hospitals would eliminate most of the issues currently associated with the financing of graduate medical education as matters of public policy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信