医生教育和健康计划中的政府间关系:国家采纳决定和联邦方案的影响

Roger Durand, Shelly L. Nelson, Kant Patel
{"title":"医生教育和健康计划中的政府间关系:国家采纳决定和联邦方案的影响","authors":"Roger Durand,&nbsp;Shelly L. Nelson,&nbsp;Kant Patel","doi":"10.1016/0165-2281(82)90006-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study seeks to explain states' adoptions of programs in health planning and in physician education. It also seeks to further understanding of the impact of federal health planning and education programs on the states. Several theories and models are employed in analyzing the actions of state decision-makers. These include incremental theory, models of the diffusion of innovations, economic resources theory, and a theory of competitive partisanship. The data utilized in this research were principally derived from intensive interviews with “key” state actors and from historical, documentary materials. Only minimal federal impact appears on states' goals in physician education and health planning. Rather, there is evidence of considerable innovativeness among the states prior to Federal program initiatives. A problem-generated search for solutions seems to be a major source of this innovation. Finally, federal program implementation requirements appear to be a major source of federal-state conflict and opposition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79937,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and education","volume":"3 3","pages":"Pages 269-283"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-2281(82)90006-6","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intergovernmental relations in physician education and health planning: State adoption decisions and the impact of federal programs\",\"authors\":\"Roger Durand,&nbsp;Shelly L. Nelson,&nbsp;Kant Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0165-2281(82)90006-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study seeks to explain states' adoptions of programs in health planning and in physician education. It also seeks to further understanding of the impact of federal health planning and education programs on the states. Several theories and models are employed in analyzing the actions of state decision-makers. These include incremental theory, models of the diffusion of innovations, economic resources theory, and a theory of competitive partisanship. The data utilized in this research were principally derived from intensive interviews with “key” state actors and from historical, documentary materials. Only minimal federal impact appears on states' goals in physician education and health planning. Rather, there is evidence of considerable innovativeness among the states prior to Federal program initiatives. A problem-generated search for solutions seems to be a major source of this innovation. Finally, federal program implementation requirements appear to be a major source of federal-state conflict and opposition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and education\",\"volume\":\"3 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 269-283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-2281(82)90006-6\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165228182900066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165228182900066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项研究试图解释各州在健康计划和医生教育方面采用的方案。它还寻求进一步了解联邦卫生计划和教育项目对各州的影响。在分析国家决策者的行为时,采用了几种理论和模型。这些理论包括增量理论、创新扩散模型、经济资源理论和竞争党派理论。本研究中使用的数据主要来自对“关键”国家行为者的密集访谈和历史文献资料。联邦政府对各州医生教育和健康规划目标的影响微乎其微。相反,有证据表明,在联邦计划倡议之前,各州之间存在相当大的创新。从问题中寻找解决方案似乎是这种创新的主要来源。最后,联邦计划实施要求似乎是联邦与州冲突和反对的主要来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intergovernmental relations in physician education and health planning: State adoption decisions and the impact of federal programs

This study seeks to explain states' adoptions of programs in health planning and in physician education. It also seeks to further understanding of the impact of federal health planning and education programs on the states. Several theories and models are employed in analyzing the actions of state decision-makers. These include incremental theory, models of the diffusion of innovations, economic resources theory, and a theory of competitive partisanship. The data utilized in this research were principally derived from intensive interviews with “key” state actors and from historical, documentary materials. Only minimal federal impact appears on states' goals in physician education and health planning. Rather, there is evidence of considerable innovativeness among the states prior to Federal program initiatives. A problem-generated search for solutions seems to be a major source of this innovation. Finally, federal program implementation requirements appear to be a major source of federal-state conflict and opposition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信