重新认证的目标

Fredric D. Burg
{"title":"重新认证的目标","authors":"Fredric D. Burg","doi":"10.1016/0165-2281(81)90010-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recertification of physician competency is a major topic of discussion and debate in the U.S.A. today. Nearly all graduates of U.S. medical schools are eventually certified by an approved American Medical Specialty Board. Since the mid-1970's all of these Specialty Boards have endorsed the concept of recertification. This paper defines what is meant by periodic assessment of physician competence, why such an assessment is becoming a reality, and the principles which should be followed in implementing a system for the periodic assessment of physician competency.</p><p>The evaluation of physician competency is a task of enormous proportions when one recognizes the difficulty of reliably and validly measuring all aspects of the skill and abilities of the practicing physician. The evaluation of intellectual capabilities is feasible, but somewhat limited with regard to the spectrum of abilities expected of the physician.</p><p>In the U.S.A., both the public and the medical profession have placed pressure on physicians to implement programs of recertification. Unlike most of the other professions, medicine has taken upon itself to develop and implement programs for recertification of the medical specialist.</p><p>To develop recertification programs of value, they should meet certain standards. These include: the need for clear specification of the criteria by which qualification for recertification will be judged or measured; the need to attempt to coordinate programs of recertification with programs of continuing medical education; the need to design evaluation tools that accurately reflect the skills and abilities needed by the physician in the practice of the medical specialties; and the need to be certain that all who participate in such a program have the opportunity to successfully complete the program (that standards for passing tests be absolute rather than normative).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79937,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and education","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 119-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-2281(81)90010-2","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objectives of recertification\",\"authors\":\"Fredric D. Burg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0165-2281(81)90010-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Recertification of physician competency is a major topic of discussion and debate in the U.S.A. today. Nearly all graduates of U.S. medical schools are eventually certified by an approved American Medical Specialty Board. Since the mid-1970's all of these Specialty Boards have endorsed the concept of recertification. This paper defines what is meant by periodic assessment of physician competence, why such an assessment is becoming a reality, and the principles which should be followed in implementing a system for the periodic assessment of physician competency.</p><p>The evaluation of physician competency is a task of enormous proportions when one recognizes the difficulty of reliably and validly measuring all aspects of the skill and abilities of the practicing physician. The evaluation of intellectual capabilities is feasible, but somewhat limited with regard to the spectrum of abilities expected of the physician.</p><p>In the U.S.A., both the public and the medical profession have placed pressure on physicians to implement programs of recertification. Unlike most of the other professions, medicine has taken upon itself to develop and implement programs for recertification of the medical specialist.</p><p>To develop recertification programs of value, they should meet certain standards. These include: the need for clear specification of the criteria by which qualification for recertification will be judged or measured; the need to attempt to coordinate programs of recertification with programs of continuing medical education; the need to design evaluation tools that accurately reflect the skills and abilities needed by the physician in the practice of the medical specialties; and the need to be certain that all who participate in such a program have the opportunity to successfully complete the program (that standards for passing tests be absolute rather than normative).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and education\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 119-125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-2281(81)90010-2\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165228181900102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165228181900102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

医师能力的重新认证是当今美国讨论和辩论的主要话题。几乎所有美国医学院的毕业生最终都获得了美国医学专业委员会的认证。自20世纪70年代中期以来,所有这些专业委员会都赞同重新认证的概念。本文对医师胜任力定期评估的含义、实施医师胜任力定期评估的原因以及实施医师胜任力定期评估制度应遵循的原则进行了界定。当人们认识到可靠有效地衡量执业医师的技能和能力的各个方面的困难时,对医生能力的评估是一项巨大的任务。对智力能力的评估是可行的,但在考虑到对医生的能力范围方面有些限制。在美国,公众和医学界都对医生施加压力,要求他们实施重新认证的计划。与大多数其他职业不同,医学已经自行制定和实施医学专家重新认证的计划。要发展有价值的再认证项目,他们应该满足一定的标准。这些包括:需要明确说明判断或衡量重新认证资格的标准;需要尝试将再认证项目与继续医学教育项目相协调;需要设计评估工具,准确反映医生在医学专业实践中所需的技能和能力;需要确保所有参加这样一个项目的人都有机会成功完成项目(通过测试的标准是绝对的,而不是规范的)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Objectives of recertification

Recertification of physician competency is a major topic of discussion and debate in the U.S.A. today. Nearly all graduates of U.S. medical schools are eventually certified by an approved American Medical Specialty Board. Since the mid-1970's all of these Specialty Boards have endorsed the concept of recertification. This paper defines what is meant by periodic assessment of physician competence, why such an assessment is becoming a reality, and the principles which should be followed in implementing a system for the periodic assessment of physician competency.

The evaluation of physician competency is a task of enormous proportions when one recognizes the difficulty of reliably and validly measuring all aspects of the skill and abilities of the practicing physician. The evaluation of intellectual capabilities is feasible, but somewhat limited with regard to the spectrum of abilities expected of the physician.

In the U.S.A., both the public and the medical profession have placed pressure on physicians to implement programs of recertification. Unlike most of the other professions, medicine has taken upon itself to develop and implement programs for recertification of the medical specialist.

To develop recertification programs of value, they should meet certain standards. These include: the need for clear specification of the criteria by which qualification for recertification will be judged or measured; the need to attempt to coordinate programs of recertification with programs of continuing medical education; the need to design evaluation tools that accurately reflect the skills and abilities needed by the physician in the practice of the medical specialties; and the need to be certain that all who participate in such a program have the opportunity to successfully complete the program (that standards for passing tests be absolute rather than normative).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信